Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness

Santiago Soliveres, Fernando T. Maestre, Werner Ulrich, Peter Manning, Steffen Boch, Matthew A Bowker, Daniel Prati, Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo, José L. Quero, Ingo Schöning, Antonio Gallardo, Wolfgang Weisser, Jörg Müller, Stephanie A. Socher, Miguel García-Gómez, Victoria Ochoa, Ernst Detlef Schulze, Markus Fischer, Eric Allan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Intransitive competition networks, those in which there is no single best competitor, may ensure species coexistence. However, their frequency and importance in maintaining diversity in real-world ecosystems remain unclear. We used two large data sets from drylands and agricultural grasslands to assess: (1) the generality of intransitive competition, (2) intransitivity-richness relationships and (3) effects of two major drivers of biodiversity loss (aridity and land-use intensification) on intransitivity and species richness. Intransitive competition occurred in > 65% of sites and was associated with higher species richness. Intransitivity increased with aridity, partly buffering its negative effects on diversity, but was decreased by intensive land use, enhancing its negative effects on diversity. These contrasting responses likely arise because intransitivity is promoted by temporal heterogeneity, which is enhanced by aridity but may decline with land-use intensity. We show that intransitivity is widespread in nature and increases diversity, but it can be lost with environmental homogenisation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)790-798
Number of pages9
JournalEcology Letters
Volume18
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

Biodiversity
dry environmental conditions
aridity
Ecosystem
plant community
plant communities
species richness
land use
species diversity
homogenization
buffering
arid lands
coexistence
grasslands
grassland
biodiversity
ecosystems
ecosystem
effect
Datasets

Keywords

  • Aridity
  • biodiversity
  • coexistence
  • drylands
  • land use
  • mesic grasslands
  • rock-paper-scissors game

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Soliveres, S., Maestre, F. T., Ulrich, W., Manning, P., Boch, S., Bowker, M. A., ... Allan, E. (2015). Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness. Ecology Letters, 18(8), 790-798. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12456

Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness. / Soliveres, Santiago; Maestre, Fernando T.; Ulrich, Werner; Manning, Peter; Boch, Steffen; Bowker, Matthew A; Prati, Daniel; Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel; Quero, José L.; Schöning, Ingo; Gallardo, Antonio; Weisser, Wolfgang; Müller, Jörg; Socher, Stephanie A.; García-Gómez, Miguel; Ochoa, Victoria; Schulze, Ernst Detlef; Fischer, Markus; Allan, Eric.

In: Ecology Letters, Vol. 18, No. 8, 01.08.2015, p. 790-798.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Soliveres, S, Maestre, FT, Ulrich, W, Manning, P, Boch, S, Bowker, MA, Prati, D, Delgado-Baquerizo, M, Quero, JL, Schöning, I, Gallardo, A, Weisser, W, Müller, J, Socher, SA, García-Gómez, M, Ochoa, V, Schulze, ED, Fischer, M & Allan, E 2015, 'Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness', Ecology Letters, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 790-798. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12456
Soliveres, Santiago ; Maestre, Fernando T. ; Ulrich, Werner ; Manning, Peter ; Boch, Steffen ; Bowker, Matthew A ; Prati, Daniel ; Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel ; Quero, José L. ; Schöning, Ingo ; Gallardo, Antonio ; Weisser, Wolfgang ; Müller, Jörg ; Socher, Stephanie A. ; García-Gómez, Miguel ; Ochoa, Victoria ; Schulze, Ernst Detlef ; Fischer, Markus ; Allan, Eric. / Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness. In: Ecology Letters. 2015 ; Vol. 18, No. 8. pp. 790-798.
@article{c39492416d47484f8eab79f83d319864,
title = "Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness",
abstract = "Intransitive competition networks, those in which there is no single best competitor, may ensure species coexistence. However, their frequency and importance in maintaining diversity in real-world ecosystems remain unclear. We used two large data sets from drylands and agricultural grasslands to assess: (1) the generality of intransitive competition, (2) intransitivity-richness relationships and (3) effects of two major drivers of biodiversity loss (aridity and land-use intensification) on intransitivity and species richness. Intransitive competition occurred in > 65{\%} of sites and was associated with higher species richness. Intransitivity increased with aridity, partly buffering its negative effects on diversity, but was decreased by intensive land use, enhancing its negative effects on diversity. These contrasting responses likely arise because intransitivity is promoted by temporal heterogeneity, which is enhanced by aridity but may decline with land-use intensity. We show that intransitivity is widespread in nature and increases diversity, but it can be lost with environmental homogenisation.",
keywords = "Aridity, biodiversity, coexistence, drylands, land use, mesic grasslands, rock-paper-scissors game",
author = "Santiago Soliveres and Maestre, {Fernando T.} and Werner Ulrich and Peter Manning and Steffen Boch and Bowker, {Matthew A} and Daniel Prati and Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo and Quero, {Jos{\'e} L.} and Ingo Sch{\"o}ning and Antonio Gallardo and Wolfgang Weisser and J{\"o}rg M{\"u}ller and Socher, {Stephanie A.} and Miguel Garc{\'i}a-G{\'o}mez and Victoria Ochoa and Schulze, {Ernst Detlef} and Markus Fischer and Eric Allan",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ele.12456",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "790--798",
journal = "Ecology Letters",
issn = "1461-023X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness

AU - Soliveres, Santiago

AU - Maestre, Fernando T.

AU - Ulrich, Werner

AU - Manning, Peter

AU - Boch, Steffen

AU - Bowker, Matthew A

AU - Prati, Daniel

AU - Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel

AU - Quero, José L.

AU - Schöning, Ingo

AU - Gallardo, Antonio

AU - Weisser, Wolfgang

AU - Müller, Jörg

AU - Socher, Stephanie A.

AU - García-Gómez, Miguel

AU - Ochoa, Victoria

AU - Schulze, Ernst Detlef

AU - Fischer, Markus

AU - Allan, Eric

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Intransitive competition networks, those in which there is no single best competitor, may ensure species coexistence. However, their frequency and importance in maintaining diversity in real-world ecosystems remain unclear. We used two large data sets from drylands and agricultural grasslands to assess: (1) the generality of intransitive competition, (2) intransitivity-richness relationships and (3) effects of two major drivers of biodiversity loss (aridity and land-use intensification) on intransitivity and species richness. Intransitive competition occurred in > 65% of sites and was associated with higher species richness. Intransitivity increased with aridity, partly buffering its negative effects on diversity, but was decreased by intensive land use, enhancing its negative effects on diversity. These contrasting responses likely arise because intransitivity is promoted by temporal heterogeneity, which is enhanced by aridity but may decline with land-use intensity. We show that intransitivity is widespread in nature and increases diversity, but it can be lost with environmental homogenisation.

AB - Intransitive competition networks, those in which there is no single best competitor, may ensure species coexistence. However, their frequency and importance in maintaining diversity in real-world ecosystems remain unclear. We used two large data sets from drylands and agricultural grasslands to assess: (1) the generality of intransitive competition, (2) intransitivity-richness relationships and (3) effects of two major drivers of biodiversity loss (aridity and land-use intensification) on intransitivity and species richness. Intransitive competition occurred in > 65% of sites and was associated with higher species richness. Intransitivity increased with aridity, partly buffering its negative effects on diversity, but was decreased by intensive land use, enhancing its negative effects on diversity. These contrasting responses likely arise because intransitivity is promoted by temporal heterogeneity, which is enhanced by aridity but may decline with land-use intensity. We show that intransitivity is widespread in nature and increases diversity, but it can be lost with environmental homogenisation.

KW - Aridity

KW - biodiversity

KW - coexistence

KW - drylands

KW - land use

KW - mesic grasslands

KW - rock-paper-scissors game

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946407073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946407073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ele.12456

DO - 10.1111/ele.12456

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 790

EP - 798

JO - Ecology Letters

JF - Ecology Letters

SN - 1461-023X

IS - 8

ER -