Interpretation of Statistical Significance Testing

John R McClure, Hoi K. Suen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is some controversy about the interpretation, or even the necessity, of tests of statistical significance. One source of confusion hindering the resolution of the controversy is the multiplicity of philosophies and paradigms behind various tests of statistical significance. This article discusses and compares three paradigms (Fisher, Neyman-Pearson, and Bayes) that have been the foundation for approaches to the analysis of statistical hypotheses. The basic assumptions, decision logic, and the nature of the statistical hypotheses tested are outlined for each paradigm, and comparisons among the three paradigms are made. Practical implications are discussed and recommendations are made to guide selection of a paradigm and associated analysis based on the particular research goals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)88-100
Number of pages13
JournalTopics in Early Childhood Special Education
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

statistical significance
paradigm
interpretation
Research
logic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Interpretation of Statistical Significance Testing. / McClure, John R; Suen, Hoi K.

In: Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1994, p. 88-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a4fd5f476afc49deb2f09046264dddd6,
title = "Interpretation of Statistical Significance Testing",
abstract = "There is some controversy about the interpretation, or even the necessity, of tests of statistical significance. One source of confusion hindering the resolution of the controversy is the multiplicity of philosophies and paradigms behind various tests of statistical significance. This article discusses and compares three paradigms (Fisher, Neyman-Pearson, and Bayes) that have been the foundation for approaches to the analysis of statistical hypotheses. The basic assumptions, decision logic, and the nature of the statistical hypotheses tested are outlined for each paradigm, and comparisons among the three paradigms are made. Practical implications are discussed and recommendations are made to guide selection of a paradigm and associated analysis based on the particular research goals.",
author = "McClure, {John R} and Suen, {Hoi K.}",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1177/027112149401400109",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "88--100",
journal = "Topics in Early Childhood Special Education",
issn = "0271-1214",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpretation of Statistical Significance Testing

AU - McClure, John R

AU - Suen, Hoi K.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - There is some controversy about the interpretation, or even the necessity, of tests of statistical significance. One source of confusion hindering the resolution of the controversy is the multiplicity of philosophies and paradigms behind various tests of statistical significance. This article discusses and compares three paradigms (Fisher, Neyman-Pearson, and Bayes) that have been the foundation for approaches to the analysis of statistical hypotheses. The basic assumptions, decision logic, and the nature of the statistical hypotheses tested are outlined for each paradigm, and comparisons among the three paradigms are made. Practical implications are discussed and recommendations are made to guide selection of a paradigm and associated analysis based on the particular research goals.

AB - There is some controversy about the interpretation, or even the necessity, of tests of statistical significance. One source of confusion hindering the resolution of the controversy is the multiplicity of philosophies and paradigms behind various tests of statistical significance. This article discusses and compares three paradigms (Fisher, Neyman-Pearson, and Bayes) that have been the foundation for approaches to the analysis of statistical hypotheses. The basic assumptions, decision logic, and the nature of the statistical hypotheses tested are outlined for each paradigm, and comparisons among the three paradigms are made. Practical implications are discussed and recommendations are made to guide selection of a paradigm and associated analysis based on the particular research goals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21344485652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21344485652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/027112149401400109

DO - 10.1177/027112149401400109

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 88

EP - 100

JO - Topics in Early Childhood Special Education

JF - Topics in Early Childhood Special Education

SN - 0271-1214

IS - 1

ER -