Integrated construction laboratory - Lessons learned

John S Tingerthal, Robert Bruner, Alan Merrill Francis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

In 2011, faculty at Northern Arizona University re-designed the Construction Management curriculum by disconnecting topic-specific laboratories from their associated lectures and forming a single integrated laboratory called 'Construct for Practice' (C4P) in an effort to provide students with context-rich experiences. In addition to merging the topic-specific content, the C4P laboratory is co-convened among sophomore, junior and senior levels to facilitate the incorporation of design and project management functions into the building process. The resulting laboratory is both horizontally integrated (among topics) and vertically integrated (among roles). Now, after four complete semesters of implementation, graduates of the CM program have experienced the complete cycle of the laboratory. This paper describes how the laboratory curriculum has developed over time, presenting a summary of lessons learned, costs associated with the laboratory and recommendations for replication at other institutions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society
PublisherAmerican Society for Engineering Education
StatePublished - 2015
Event2015 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition - Seattle, United States
Duration: Jun 14 2015Jun 17 2015

Other

Other2015 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
CountryUnited States
CitySeattle
Period6/14/156/17/15

Fingerprint

Curricula
Project management
Merging
Students
Costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Tingerthal, J. S., Bruner, R., & Francis, A. M. (2015). Integrated construction laboratory - Lessons learned. In 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society American Society for Engineering Education.

Integrated construction laboratory - Lessons learned. / Tingerthal, John S; Bruner, Robert; Francis, Alan Merrill.

122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society. American Society for Engineering Education, 2015.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Tingerthal, JS, Bruner, R & Francis, AM 2015, Integrated construction laboratory - Lessons learned. in 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society. American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, United States, 6/14/15.
Tingerthal JS, Bruner R, Francis AM. Integrated construction laboratory - Lessons learned. In 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society. American Society for Engineering Education. 2015
Tingerthal, John S ; Bruner, Robert ; Francis, Alan Merrill. / Integrated construction laboratory - Lessons learned. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society. American Society for Engineering Education, 2015.
@inproceedings{e2c1dbaac37b4c738f757f34b96edcc1,
title = "Integrated construction laboratory - Lessons learned",
abstract = "In 2011, faculty at Northern Arizona University re-designed the Construction Management curriculum by disconnecting topic-specific laboratories from their associated lectures and forming a single integrated laboratory called 'Construct for Practice' (C4P) in an effort to provide students with context-rich experiences. In addition to merging the topic-specific content, the C4P laboratory is co-convened among sophomore, junior and senior levels to facilitate the incorporation of design and project management functions into the building process. The resulting laboratory is both horizontally integrated (among topics) and vertically integrated (among roles). Now, after four complete semesters of implementation, graduates of the CM program have experienced the complete cycle of the laboratory. This paper describes how the laboratory curriculum has developed over time, presenting a summary of lessons learned, costs associated with the laboratory and recommendations for replication at other institutions.",
author = "Tingerthal, {John S} and Robert Bruner and Francis, {Alan Merrill}",
year = "2015",
language = "English (US)",
booktitle = "122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society",
publisher = "American Society for Engineering Education",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Integrated construction laboratory - Lessons learned

AU - Tingerthal, John S

AU - Bruner, Robert

AU - Francis, Alan Merrill

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In 2011, faculty at Northern Arizona University re-designed the Construction Management curriculum by disconnecting topic-specific laboratories from their associated lectures and forming a single integrated laboratory called 'Construct for Practice' (C4P) in an effort to provide students with context-rich experiences. In addition to merging the topic-specific content, the C4P laboratory is co-convened among sophomore, junior and senior levels to facilitate the incorporation of design and project management functions into the building process. The resulting laboratory is both horizontally integrated (among topics) and vertically integrated (among roles). Now, after four complete semesters of implementation, graduates of the CM program have experienced the complete cycle of the laboratory. This paper describes how the laboratory curriculum has developed over time, presenting a summary of lessons learned, costs associated with the laboratory and recommendations for replication at other institutions.

AB - In 2011, faculty at Northern Arizona University re-designed the Construction Management curriculum by disconnecting topic-specific laboratories from their associated lectures and forming a single integrated laboratory called 'Construct for Practice' (C4P) in an effort to provide students with context-rich experiences. In addition to merging the topic-specific content, the C4P laboratory is co-convened among sophomore, junior and senior levels to facilitate the incorporation of design and project management functions into the building process. The resulting laboratory is both horizontally integrated (among topics) and vertically integrated (among roles). Now, after four complete semesters of implementation, graduates of the CM program have experienced the complete cycle of the laboratory. This paper describes how the laboratory curriculum has developed over time, presenting a summary of lessons learned, costs associated with the laboratory and recommendations for replication at other institutions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941997636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941997636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84941997636

BT - 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society

PB - American Society for Engineering Education

ER -