Influence of rearfoot postural alignment on rearfoot motion during walking

Mark W Cornwall, Thomas G. McPoil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of rearfoot posture on dynamic frontal plane rearfoot motion during the stance phase of walking. Methods: The rearfoot angle (RFA) was measured in 164 feet and then two groups were created representing extreme values. The two groups were labeled as either EVERTED or INVERTED. Frontal plane rearfoot kinematics was then assessed using an electromagnetic motion analysis system as subjects walked barefoot. Results: The results of this study indicated that there is no significant (P>0.05) difference between either of the experimental groups with regard to frontal plane rearfoot motion. These results indicate that static rearfoot angle does not influence dynamic rearfoot motion. Conclusion: It also raises serious questions concerning the clinical utility of measuring the rearfoot angle since it does not appear to be a good predictor of a person's rearfoot motion pattern during walking.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)133-138
Number of pages6
JournalFoot
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2004

Fingerprint

Walking
Electromagnetic Phenomena
Posture
Biomechanical Phenomena

Keywords

  • Foot posture
  • Rearfoot angle
  • Rearfoot motion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Influence of rearfoot postural alignment on rearfoot motion during walking. / Cornwall, Mark W; McPoil, Thomas G.

In: Foot, Vol. 14, No. 3, 09.2004, p. 133-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cornwall, Mark W ; McPoil, Thomas G. / Influence of rearfoot postural alignment on rearfoot motion during walking. In: Foot. 2004 ; Vol. 14, No. 3. pp. 133-138.
@article{f14eabf321ac4ca7a460f911cc3edef5,
title = "Influence of rearfoot postural alignment on rearfoot motion during walking",
abstract = "Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of rearfoot posture on dynamic frontal plane rearfoot motion during the stance phase of walking. Methods: The rearfoot angle (RFA) was measured in 164 feet and then two groups were created representing extreme values. The two groups were labeled as either EVERTED or INVERTED. Frontal plane rearfoot kinematics was then assessed using an electromagnetic motion analysis system as subjects walked barefoot. Results: The results of this study indicated that there is no significant (P>0.05) difference between either of the experimental groups with regard to frontal plane rearfoot motion. These results indicate that static rearfoot angle does not influence dynamic rearfoot motion. Conclusion: It also raises serious questions concerning the clinical utility of measuring the rearfoot angle since it does not appear to be a good predictor of a person's rearfoot motion pattern during walking.",
keywords = "Foot posture, Rearfoot angle, Rearfoot motion",
author = "Cornwall, {Mark W} and McPoil, {Thomas G.}",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.foot.2004.02.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "133--138",
journal = "Foot",
issn = "0958-2592",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of rearfoot postural alignment on rearfoot motion during walking

AU - Cornwall, Mark W

AU - McPoil, Thomas G.

PY - 2004/9

Y1 - 2004/9

N2 - Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of rearfoot posture on dynamic frontal plane rearfoot motion during the stance phase of walking. Methods: The rearfoot angle (RFA) was measured in 164 feet and then two groups were created representing extreme values. The two groups were labeled as either EVERTED or INVERTED. Frontal plane rearfoot kinematics was then assessed using an electromagnetic motion analysis system as subjects walked barefoot. Results: The results of this study indicated that there is no significant (P>0.05) difference between either of the experimental groups with regard to frontal plane rearfoot motion. These results indicate that static rearfoot angle does not influence dynamic rearfoot motion. Conclusion: It also raises serious questions concerning the clinical utility of measuring the rearfoot angle since it does not appear to be a good predictor of a person's rearfoot motion pattern during walking.

AB - Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of rearfoot posture on dynamic frontal plane rearfoot motion during the stance phase of walking. Methods: The rearfoot angle (RFA) was measured in 164 feet and then two groups were created representing extreme values. The two groups were labeled as either EVERTED or INVERTED. Frontal plane rearfoot kinematics was then assessed using an electromagnetic motion analysis system as subjects walked barefoot. Results: The results of this study indicated that there is no significant (P>0.05) difference between either of the experimental groups with regard to frontal plane rearfoot motion. These results indicate that static rearfoot angle does not influence dynamic rearfoot motion. Conclusion: It also raises serious questions concerning the clinical utility of measuring the rearfoot angle since it does not appear to be a good predictor of a person's rearfoot motion pattern during walking.

KW - Foot posture

KW - Rearfoot angle

KW - Rearfoot motion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3242774498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3242774498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foot.2004.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.foot.2004.02.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:3242774498

VL - 14

SP - 133

EP - 138

JO - Foot

JF - Foot

SN - 0958-2592

IS - 3

ER -