Indigenous-Run Legal Services in Australia and Canada

Comparative Developmental Issues

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Indigenous peoples are overrepresented in the courts of both Australia and Canada. They face a number of special disadvantages in dealing with the courts that historically have led to the development of special legal services operated by Indigenous people. The kind of legal organization is not the same in these two countries because of differences in their organizational environments. These include demographics, economics, culture, law, politics, ecology, and technology. These factors provided both constraints and opportunities for the new organizations. Examples from two case studies are used: Native Counselling Services of Alberta, Canada, which provides Native Courtworkers and legal information services, and the Aboriginal Legal Rights Movement, Inc. of South Australia, which provides legal representation and legal information. The case studies indicate that Indigenous legal services organizations must still adapt and innovate by constructing new realities if they are to continue to provide desperately needed services for Indigenous peoples.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)157-178
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Criminal Justice Review
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Canada
information service
ecology
counseling
organization
Law
politics
economics

Keywords

  • Australian Aborigines
  • Canadian Aboriginal peoples
  • Indigenous peoples
  • justice
  • justice organizations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

@article{cf22aa136dbf445ca19a566cc27e5cf0,
title = "Indigenous-Run Legal Services in Australia and Canada: Comparative Developmental Issues",
abstract = "Indigenous peoples are overrepresented in the courts of both Australia and Canada. They face a number of special disadvantages in dealing with the courts that historically have led to the development of special legal services operated by Indigenous people. The kind of legal organization is not the same in these two countries because of differences in their organizational environments. These include demographics, economics, culture, law, politics, ecology, and technology. These factors provided both constraints and opportunities for the new organizations. Examples from two case studies are used: Native Counselling Services of Alberta, Canada, which provides Native Courtworkers and legal information services, and the Aboriginal Legal Rights Movement, Inc. of South Australia, which provides legal representation and legal information. The case studies indicate that Indigenous legal services organizations must still adapt and innovate by constructing new realities if they are to continue to provide desperately needed services for Indigenous peoples.",
keywords = "Australian Aborigines, Canadian Aboriginal peoples, Indigenous peoples, justice, justice organizations",
author = "Nielsen, {Marianne O}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1177/1057567706295486",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "157--178",
journal = "International Criminal Justice Review",
issn = "1057-5677",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indigenous-Run Legal Services in Australia and Canada

T2 - Comparative Developmental Issues

AU - Nielsen, Marianne O

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Indigenous peoples are overrepresented in the courts of both Australia and Canada. They face a number of special disadvantages in dealing with the courts that historically have led to the development of special legal services operated by Indigenous people. The kind of legal organization is not the same in these two countries because of differences in their organizational environments. These include demographics, economics, culture, law, politics, ecology, and technology. These factors provided both constraints and opportunities for the new organizations. Examples from two case studies are used: Native Counselling Services of Alberta, Canada, which provides Native Courtworkers and legal information services, and the Aboriginal Legal Rights Movement, Inc. of South Australia, which provides legal representation and legal information. The case studies indicate that Indigenous legal services organizations must still adapt and innovate by constructing new realities if they are to continue to provide desperately needed services for Indigenous peoples.

AB - Indigenous peoples are overrepresented in the courts of both Australia and Canada. They face a number of special disadvantages in dealing with the courts that historically have led to the development of special legal services operated by Indigenous people. The kind of legal organization is not the same in these two countries because of differences in their organizational environments. These include demographics, economics, culture, law, politics, ecology, and technology. These factors provided both constraints and opportunities for the new organizations. Examples from two case studies are used: Native Counselling Services of Alberta, Canada, which provides Native Courtworkers and legal information services, and the Aboriginal Legal Rights Movement, Inc. of South Australia, which provides legal representation and legal information. The case studies indicate that Indigenous legal services organizations must still adapt and innovate by constructing new realities if they are to continue to provide desperately needed services for Indigenous peoples.

KW - Australian Aborigines

KW - Canadian Aboriginal peoples

KW - Indigenous peoples

KW - justice

KW - justice organizations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84993790570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84993790570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1057567706295486

DO - 10.1177/1057567706295486

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 157

EP - 178

JO - International Criminal Justice Review

JF - International Criminal Justice Review

SN - 1057-5677

IS - 3

ER -