Increasing dental hygiene student diversity: Life-performance questions as alternative admissions criteria

Denise M Helm, Ellen S. Grabarek, Marjorie Reveal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The goal of this study was to create a race/ethnic-neutral admission process. An increase in student diversity in the Northern Arizona University Dental Hygiene Program (NAU DH) was accomplished through modification of its acceptance process. Sixty students, 22% underrepresented minority (URM), were selected using alternative criteria compared with 6.7% URM that would have been accepted using traditional criteria. For the purpose of this study, URM are defined as African American, Hispanic, Native American, or bicultural, groups that are underrepresented in dental hygiene. Six life-performance questions were added on the written application and were designed to assess the candidates' personal characteristics, including (1) leadership, (2) community service, (3) realistic self-appraisal, (4) personal support system, (5) ability to deal with racism, (6) ability to set goals and self-responsibility. Scores from the response to these questions were used as part of the total selection criteria. Data analysis revealed that white candidates scored higher than URM candidates on grade point average (GPA), science GPA, and total points, yet both groups scored the same on life-performance questions. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that alternative criteria in the acceptance process more fairly assesses candidates' qualifications and increases the diversity of the NAU DH student population. These alternative acceptance criteria may serve as a model for dental hygiene and other allied health programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)279-284
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Allied Health
Volume32
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 2003

Fingerprint

Dental Students
Oral Hygiene
Aptitude
Students
Racism
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Population Control
North American Indians
Social Welfare
Hispanic Americans
African Americans
Patient Selection
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Increasing dental hygiene student diversity : Life-performance questions as alternative admissions criteria. / Helm, Denise M; Grabarek, Ellen S.; Reveal, Marjorie.

In: Journal of Allied Health, Vol. 32, No. 4, 12.2003, p. 279-284.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{25c29bd95d90449bbb28f8d0b6634cec,
title = "Increasing dental hygiene student diversity: Life-performance questions as alternative admissions criteria",
abstract = "The goal of this study was to create a race/ethnic-neutral admission process. An increase in student diversity in the Northern Arizona University Dental Hygiene Program (NAU DH) was accomplished through modification of its acceptance process. Sixty students, 22{\%} underrepresented minority (URM), were selected using alternative criteria compared with 6.7{\%} URM that would have been accepted using traditional criteria. For the purpose of this study, URM are defined as African American, Hispanic, Native American, or bicultural, groups that are underrepresented in dental hygiene. Six life-performance questions were added on the written application and were designed to assess the candidates' personal characteristics, including (1) leadership, (2) community service, (3) realistic self-appraisal, (4) personal support system, (5) ability to deal with racism, (6) ability to set goals and self-responsibility. Scores from the response to these questions were used as part of the total selection criteria. Data analysis revealed that white candidates scored higher than URM candidates on grade point average (GPA), science GPA, and total points, yet both groups scored the same on life-performance questions. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that alternative criteria in the acceptance process more fairly assesses candidates' qualifications and increases the diversity of the NAU DH student population. These alternative acceptance criteria may serve as a model for dental hygiene and other allied health programs.",
author = "Helm, {Denise M} and Grabarek, {Ellen S.} and Marjorie Reveal",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "279--284",
journal = "Journal of Allied Health",
issn = "0090-7421",
publisher = "Science and Medicine Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Increasing dental hygiene student diversity

T2 - Life-performance questions as alternative admissions criteria

AU - Helm, Denise M

AU - Grabarek, Ellen S.

AU - Reveal, Marjorie

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - The goal of this study was to create a race/ethnic-neutral admission process. An increase in student diversity in the Northern Arizona University Dental Hygiene Program (NAU DH) was accomplished through modification of its acceptance process. Sixty students, 22% underrepresented minority (URM), were selected using alternative criteria compared with 6.7% URM that would have been accepted using traditional criteria. For the purpose of this study, URM are defined as African American, Hispanic, Native American, or bicultural, groups that are underrepresented in dental hygiene. Six life-performance questions were added on the written application and were designed to assess the candidates' personal characteristics, including (1) leadership, (2) community service, (3) realistic self-appraisal, (4) personal support system, (5) ability to deal with racism, (6) ability to set goals and self-responsibility. Scores from the response to these questions were used as part of the total selection criteria. Data analysis revealed that white candidates scored higher than URM candidates on grade point average (GPA), science GPA, and total points, yet both groups scored the same on life-performance questions. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that alternative criteria in the acceptance process more fairly assesses candidates' qualifications and increases the diversity of the NAU DH student population. These alternative acceptance criteria may serve as a model for dental hygiene and other allied health programs.

AB - The goal of this study was to create a race/ethnic-neutral admission process. An increase in student diversity in the Northern Arizona University Dental Hygiene Program (NAU DH) was accomplished through modification of its acceptance process. Sixty students, 22% underrepresented minority (URM), were selected using alternative criteria compared with 6.7% URM that would have been accepted using traditional criteria. For the purpose of this study, URM are defined as African American, Hispanic, Native American, or bicultural, groups that are underrepresented in dental hygiene. Six life-performance questions were added on the written application and were designed to assess the candidates' personal characteristics, including (1) leadership, (2) community service, (3) realistic self-appraisal, (4) personal support system, (5) ability to deal with racism, (6) ability to set goals and self-responsibility. Scores from the response to these questions were used as part of the total selection criteria. Data analysis revealed that white candidates scored higher than URM candidates on grade point average (GPA), science GPA, and total points, yet both groups scored the same on life-performance questions. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that alternative criteria in the acceptance process more fairly assesses candidates' qualifications and increases the diversity of the NAU DH student population. These alternative acceptance criteria may serve as a model for dental hygiene and other allied health programs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1442328550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1442328550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 14714604

AN - SCOPUS:1442328550

VL - 32

SP - 279

EP - 284

JO - Journal of Allied Health

JF - Journal of Allied Health

SN - 0090-7421

IS - 4

ER -