Inclusion of students with significant disabilities in SWPBS evaluation tools

Jennifer A Kurth, Alison Zagona, Mayumi Hagiwara, Matt Enyart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Students with significant disabilities (intellectual and developmental disabilities) are predominantly educated in separate settings, and tend to have little access to schoolwide positive behavior supports (SWPBS). In this study, we first identified the most commonly cited SWPBS evaluation tools in the literature between 2010 and 2016. The SET, TIC, and BoQ were identified as the most commonly cited. Next, these evaluation tools were analyzed for their purposeful inclusion of students with significant disabilities. Findings revealed the tools emphasize all staff and all students when describing systems and data aspects of SWPBS which have limited direct impact on students, but make allowances, such as “most students” when describing the implementation SWPBS that directly impact students, thus creating loopholes that may inadvertently permit the exclusion of learners with the most significant disabilities from fully participating in, and benefitting from, SWPBS efforts. Implications and recommendations for practitioners and researchers are provided.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)383-392
Number of pages10
JournalEducation and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities
Volume52
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

disability
inclusion
Students
evaluation
student
Developmental Disabilities
Information Systems
Intellectual Disability
exclusion
Research Personnel
staff

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Inclusion of students with significant disabilities in SWPBS evaluation tools. / Kurth, Jennifer A; Zagona, Alison; Hagiwara, Mayumi; Enyart, Matt.

In: Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 52, No. 4, 01.12.2017, p. 383-392.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{798f6e110f1a49348c7fc47abd4930b7,
title = "Inclusion of students with significant disabilities in SWPBS evaluation tools",
abstract = "Students with significant disabilities (intellectual and developmental disabilities) are predominantly educated in separate settings, and tend to have little access to schoolwide positive behavior supports (SWPBS). In this study, we first identified the most commonly cited SWPBS evaluation tools in the literature between 2010 and 2016. The SET, TIC, and BoQ were identified as the most commonly cited. Next, these evaluation tools were analyzed for their purposeful inclusion of students with significant disabilities. Findings revealed the tools emphasize all staff and all students when describing systems and data aspects of SWPBS which have limited direct impact on students, but make allowances, such as “most students” when describing the implementation SWPBS that directly impact students, thus creating loopholes that may inadvertently permit the exclusion of learners with the most significant disabilities from fully participating in, and benefitting from, SWPBS efforts. Implications and recommendations for practitioners and researchers are provided.",
author = "Kurth, {Jennifer A} and Alison Zagona and Mayumi Hagiwara and Matt Enyart",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "383--392",
journal = "Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities",
issn = "2154-1647",
publisher = "Council for Exceptional Children",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inclusion of students with significant disabilities in SWPBS evaluation tools

AU - Kurth, Jennifer A

AU - Zagona, Alison

AU - Hagiwara, Mayumi

AU - Enyart, Matt

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Students with significant disabilities (intellectual and developmental disabilities) are predominantly educated in separate settings, and tend to have little access to schoolwide positive behavior supports (SWPBS). In this study, we first identified the most commonly cited SWPBS evaluation tools in the literature between 2010 and 2016. The SET, TIC, and BoQ were identified as the most commonly cited. Next, these evaluation tools were analyzed for their purposeful inclusion of students with significant disabilities. Findings revealed the tools emphasize all staff and all students when describing systems and data aspects of SWPBS which have limited direct impact on students, but make allowances, such as “most students” when describing the implementation SWPBS that directly impact students, thus creating loopholes that may inadvertently permit the exclusion of learners with the most significant disabilities from fully participating in, and benefitting from, SWPBS efforts. Implications and recommendations for practitioners and researchers are provided.

AB - Students with significant disabilities (intellectual and developmental disabilities) are predominantly educated in separate settings, and tend to have little access to schoolwide positive behavior supports (SWPBS). In this study, we first identified the most commonly cited SWPBS evaluation tools in the literature between 2010 and 2016. The SET, TIC, and BoQ were identified as the most commonly cited. Next, these evaluation tools were analyzed for their purposeful inclusion of students with significant disabilities. Findings revealed the tools emphasize all staff and all students when describing systems and data aspects of SWPBS which have limited direct impact on students, but make allowances, such as “most students” when describing the implementation SWPBS that directly impact students, thus creating loopholes that may inadvertently permit the exclusion of learners with the most significant disabilities from fully participating in, and benefitting from, SWPBS efforts. Implications and recommendations for practitioners and researchers are provided.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052496215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052496215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85052496215

VL - 52

SP - 383

EP - 392

JO - Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities

JF - Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities

SN - 2154-1647

IS - 4

ER -