Including aboriginal issues in forest planning: A case study in central interior British Columbia, Canada

Melanie K. Karjala, Stephen M Dewhurst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Generic criteria and indicator (C&I) frameworks have been the focus of recent work on sustainable forest management. These templates, however, may not be an appropriate approach for directing landscape-level forest management strategies. Instead, many argue that sustainable management should be determined using "bottom-up" approaches rather than standardized frameworks. This requires engaging local expertise in defining sustainability. Having a culturally distinct form of local knowledge, Aboriginal communities have an important role to play in decision-making processes. However, conventional participatory approaches, such as generic C&I frameworks and multi-stakeholder planning processes, are often inappropriate for engaging Aboriginal involvement. We suggest that landscape-level forest planning should highlight rather than assimilate cultural perspectives on sustainable forest management. Using the co-managed John Prince Research Forest in central interior British Columbia as a case study, this paper presents the results of using C&I and a scenario planning approach to describe an Aboriginal perspective of good forest stewardship. These results demonstrate that, in contrast with existing C&I frameworks, locally-based sustainability criteria provide better guidance for developing and adapting landscape-level forest plans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
Volume64
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

British Columbia
planning
Canada
case studies
forest management
sustainable forestry
sustainability
bottom-up approach
participatory approach
traditional knowledge
planning process
stakeholders
decision making
stakeholder

Keywords

  • Criteria and indicators
  • Forest planning
  • Indigenous people

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Including aboriginal issues in forest planning : A case study in central interior British Columbia, Canada. / Karjala, Melanie K.; Dewhurst, Stephen M.

In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 64, No. 1-2, 2003, p. 1-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f77305cb8f8241bab2a6a879a98b840e,
title = "Including aboriginal issues in forest planning: A case study in central interior British Columbia, Canada",
abstract = "Generic criteria and indicator (C&I) frameworks have been the focus of recent work on sustainable forest management. These templates, however, may not be an appropriate approach for directing landscape-level forest management strategies. Instead, many argue that sustainable management should be determined using {"}bottom-up{"} approaches rather than standardized frameworks. This requires engaging local expertise in defining sustainability. Having a culturally distinct form of local knowledge, Aboriginal communities have an important role to play in decision-making processes. However, conventional participatory approaches, such as generic C&I frameworks and multi-stakeholder planning processes, are often inappropriate for engaging Aboriginal involvement. We suggest that landscape-level forest planning should highlight rather than assimilate cultural perspectives on sustainable forest management. Using the co-managed John Prince Research Forest in central interior British Columbia as a case study, this paper presents the results of using C&I and a scenario planning approach to describe an Aboriginal perspective of good forest stewardship. These results demonstrate that, in contrast with existing C&I frameworks, locally-based sustainability criteria provide better guidance for developing and adapting landscape-level forest plans.",
keywords = "Criteria and indicators, Forest planning, Indigenous people",
author = "Karjala, {Melanie K.} and Dewhurst, {Stephen M}",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00196-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "1--17",
journal = "Landscape and Urban Planning",
issn = "0169-2046",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Including aboriginal issues in forest planning

T2 - A case study in central interior British Columbia, Canada

AU - Karjala, Melanie K.

AU - Dewhurst, Stephen M

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Generic criteria and indicator (C&I) frameworks have been the focus of recent work on sustainable forest management. These templates, however, may not be an appropriate approach for directing landscape-level forest management strategies. Instead, many argue that sustainable management should be determined using "bottom-up" approaches rather than standardized frameworks. This requires engaging local expertise in defining sustainability. Having a culturally distinct form of local knowledge, Aboriginal communities have an important role to play in decision-making processes. However, conventional participatory approaches, such as generic C&I frameworks and multi-stakeholder planning processes, are often inappropriate for engaging Aboriginal involvement. We suggest that landscape-level forest planning should highlight rather than assimilate cultural perspectives on sustainable forest management. Using the co-managed John Prince Research Forest in central interior British Columbia as a case study, this paper presents the results of using C&I and a scenario planning approach to describe an Aboriginal perspective of good forest stewardship. These results demonstrate that, in contrast with existing C&I frameworks, locally-based sustainability criteria provide better guidance for developing and adapting landscape-level forest plans.

AB - Generic criteria and indicator (C&I) frameworks have been the focus of recent work on sustainable forest management. These templates, however, may not be an appropriate approach for directing landscape-level forest management strategies. Instead, many argue that sustainable management should be determined using "bottom-up" approaches rather than standardized frameworks. This requires engaging local expertise in defining sustainability. Having a culturally distinct form of local knowledge, Aboriginal communities have an important role to play in decision-making processes. However, conventional participatory approaches, such as generic C&I frameworks and multi-stakeholder planning processes, are often inappropriate for engaging Aboriginal involvement. We suggest that landscape-level forest planning should highlight rather than assimilate cultural perspectives on sustainable forest management. Using the co-managed John Prince Research Forest in central interior British Columbia as a case study, this paper presents the results of using C&I and a scenario planning approach to describe an Aboriginal perspective of good forest stewardship. These results demonstrate that, in contrast with existing C&I frameworks, locally-based sustainability criteria provide better guidance for developing and adapting landscape-level forest plans.

KW - Criteria and indicators

KW - Forest planning

KW - Indigenous people

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038220928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038220928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00196-2

DO - 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00196-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0038220928

VL - 64

SP - 1

EP - 17

JO - Landscape and Urban Planning

JF - Landscape and Urban Planning

SN - 0169-2046

IS - 1-2

ER -