Improving field success of biocrust rehabilitation materials: hardening the organisms or softening the environment?

Matthew A Bowker, Anita J. Antoninka, Peter F. Chuckran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Drylands are a widely degraded biome characterized by low productivity and high abiotic stress. Biological soil crust (biocrust) inoculants hold promise as a rehabilitation material in drylands, useful for boosting ecosystem functions including stabilization of eroding soil surfaces. However, biocrust materials cultivated ex situ by humans inconsistently establish under field conditions. We tested two approaches aimed at improving field establishment of biocrust inoculum: exposing the organisms within the inoculum to abiotic stress in an attempt to harden them, and applying habitat ameliorations intended to reduce the stressfulness of the environment. We hypothesized that both approaches in concert would lead to the most consistent field establishment of biocrusts. Overall, addition of biocrust inoculum did enhance biocrust establishment over the 1.5-year duration of the study but did not result in full recovery. Generally, hardened biocrust inoculum performed no better than inoculum that was not hardened, although one indicator (chlorophyll a) was enhanced by addition of hardened inoculum in some circumstances. Temporary irrigation was initially an effective habitat amelioration but had no effect on biocrust establishment by 1.5 years. In contrast, application of jute net to the soil surface promoted biocrust establishment both in synergy with and in the absence of inoculum addition. We hypothesize that jute net stabilizes the soil surface, reduces abiotic stress, and enhances resource availability, overcoming barriers to establishment of biocrusts. Currently, there is broad support for the efficacy of habitat amelioration approaches in biocrust rehabilitation, but effective hardening techniques remain elusive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalRestoration Ecology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

soil crusts
soil crust
rehabilitation (people)
softening
hardening
inoculum
organisms
abiotic stress
jute
soil surface
remediation
arid lands
habitat
habitats
soil stabilization
organism
material
rehabilitation
ecosystems
resource availability

Keywords

  • bio-inoculants
  • biological soil crust
  • cyanobacteria
  • dryland
  • erosion control
  • moss
  • soil aggregation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Improving field success of biocrust rehabilitation materials : hardening the organisms or softening the environment? / Bowker, Matthew A; Antoninka, Anita J.; Chuckran, Peter F.

In: Restoration Ecology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7b6863c4c3b34bc7b2d032912edbe44c,
title = "Improving field success of biocrust rehabilitation materials: hardening the organisms or softening the environment?",
abstract = "Drylands are a widely degraded biome characterized by low productivity and high abiotic stress. Biological soil crust (biocrust) inoculants hold promise as a rehabilitation material in drylands, useful for boosting ecosystem functions including stabilization of eroding soil surfaces. However, biocrust materials cultivated ex situ by humans inconsistently establish under field conditions. We tested two approaches aimed at improving field establishment of biocrust inoculum: exposing the organisms within the inoculum to abiotic stress in an attempt to harden them, and applying habitat ameliorations intended to reduce the stressfulness of the environment. We hypothesized that both approaches in concert would lead to the most consistent field establishment of biocrusts. Overall, addition of biocrust inoculum did enhance biocrust establishment over the 1.5-year duration of the study but did not result in full recovery. Generally, hardened biocrust inoculum performed no better than inoculum that was not hardened, although one indicator (chlorophyll a) was enhanced by addition of hardened inoculum in some circumstances. Temporary irrigation was initially an effective habitat amelioration but had no effect on biocrust establishment by 1.5 years. In contrast, application of jute net to the soil surface promoted biocrust establishment both in synergy with and in the absence of inoculum addition. We hypothesize that jute net stabilizes the soil surface, reduces abiotic stress, and enhances resource availability, overcoming barriers to establishment of biocrusts. Currently, there is broad support for the efficacy of habitat amelioration approaches in biocrust rehabilitation, but effective hardening techniques remain elusive.",
keywords = "bio-inoculants, biological soil crust, cyanobacteria, dryland, erosion control, moss, soil aggregation",
author = "Bowker, {Matthew A} and Antoninka, {Anita J.} and Chuckran, {Peter F.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/rec.12965",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Restoration Ecology",
issn = "1061-2971",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving field success of biocrust rehabilitation materials

T2 - hardening the organisms or softening the environment?

AU - Bowker, Matthew A

AU - Antoninka, Anita J.

AU - Chuckran, Peter F.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Drylands are a widely degraded biome characterized by low productivity and high abiotic stress. Biological soil crust (biocrust) inoculants hold promise as a rehabilitation material in drylands, useful for boosting ecosystem functions including stabilization of eroding soil surfaces. However, biocrust materials cultivated ex situ by humans inconsistently establish under field conditions. We tested two approaches aimed at improving field establishment of biocrust inoculum: exposing the organisms within the inoculum to abiotic stress in an attempt to harden them, and applying habitat ameliorations intended to reduce the stressfulness of the environment. We hypothesized that both approaches in concert would lead to the most consistent field establishment of biocrusts. Overall, addition of biocrust inoculum did enhance biocrust establishment over the 1.5-year duration of the study but did not result in full recovery. Generally, hardened biocrust inoculum performed no better than inoculum that was not hardened, although one indicator (chlorophyll a) was enhanced by addition of hardened inoculum in some circumstances. Temporary irrigation was initially an effective habitat amelioration but had no effect on biocrust establishment by 1.5 years. In contrast, application of jute net to the soil surface promoted biocrust establishment both in synergy with and in the absence of inoculum addition. We hypothesize that jute net stabilizes the soil surface, reduces abiotic stress, and enhances resource availability, overcoming barriers to establishment of biocrusts. Currently, there is broad support for the efficacy of habitat amelioration approaches in biocrust rehabilitation, but effective hardening techniques remain elusive.

AB - Drylands are a widely degraded biome characterized by low productivity and high abiotic stress. Biological soil crust (biocrust) inoculants hold promise as a rehabilitation material in drylands, useful for boosting ecosystem functions including stabilization of eroding soil surfaces. However, biocrust materials cultivated ex situ by humans inconsistently establish under field conditions. We tested two approaches aimed at improving field establishment of biocrust inoculum: exposing the organisms within the inoculum to abiotic stress in an attempt to harden them, and applying habitat ameliorations intended to reduce the stressfulness of the environment. We hypothesized that both approaches in concert would lead to the most consistent field establishment of biocrusts. Overall, addition of biocrust inoculum did enhance biocrust establishment over the 1.5-year duration of the study but did not result in full recovery. Generally, hardened biocrust inoculum performed no better than inoculum that was not hardened, although one indicator (chlorophyll a) was enhanced by addition of hardened inoculum in some circumstances. Temporary irrigation was initially an effective habitat amelioration but had no effect on biocrust establishment by 1.5 years. In contrast, application of jute net to the soil surface promoted biocrust establishment both in synergy with and in the absence of inoculum addition. We hypothesize that jute net stabilizes the soil surface, reduces abiotic stress, and enhances resource availability, overcoming barriers to establishment of biocrusts. Currently, there is broad support for the efficacy of habitat amelioration approaches in biocrust rehabilitation, but effective hardening techniques remain elusive.

KW - bio-inoculants

KW - biological soil crust

KW - cyanobacteria

KW - dryland

KW - erosion control

KW - moss

KW - soil aggregation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069815384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069815384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/rec.12965

DO - 10.1111/rec.12965

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85069815384

JO - Restoration Ecology

JF - Restoration Ecology

SN - 1061-2971

ER -