Improving Concussion-Reporting Behavior in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Football Players: Evidence for the Applicability of the Socioecological Model for Athletic Trainers

Monica R. Lininger, Heidi A Wayment, Deborah I Craig, Ann H Huffman, Taylor S. Lane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

CONTEXT: Few researchers have examined the views of important stakeholders in football student-athletes' spheres of influence and whether their views map well in a systems approach to understanding concussion-reporting behavior (CRB). OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which stakeholders' beliefs about what influences football players' CRBs reflect system-level influences that go beyond individual-level factors. DESIGN: Qualitative study. SETTING: Four National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I university athletic programs. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 26 individuals (athletic directors = 5, athletic trainers [ATs] = 10, football coaches = 11). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Semistructured interviews with stakeholders were transcribed and analyzed using the socioecological model according to the Miles and Huberman coding methods. RESULTS: Stakeholders largely identified individual-level factors (attitudes), followed by exosystem-level factors (university policies and support for ATs), with fewer microsystem- and mesosystem-level factors (coach influence and communication between coaches and ATs, respectively) and almost no macrosystem-level factors (media influence, cultural norms about aggression and toughness in football). CONCLUSIONS: Promising evidence indicates growing stakeholder awareness of the importance of exosystem-level factors (eg, medical personnel and CRB policies) in influencing CRB rates. However, frontline stakeholders and policy makers may benefit from practices that bridge these influences (eg, coach involvement and communication), allowing for a more integrated approach to influence student-athletes' willingness to improve their CRBs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-29
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of athletic training
Volume54
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Football
Sports
Athletes
Communication
Students
Systems Analysis
Administrative Personnel
Aggression
Research Personnel
Interviews
Mentoring

Keywords

  • head trauma
  • mild traumatic brain injuries
  • theories

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{583bc6c75b984699b8b44778247af119,
title = "Improving Concussion-Reporting Behavior in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Football Players: Evidence for the Applicability of the Socioecological Model for Athletic Trainers",
abstract = "CONTEXT: Few researchers have examined the views of important stakeholders in football student-athletes' spheres of influence and whether their views map well in a systems approach to understanding concussion-reporting behavior (CRB). OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which stakeholders' beliefs about what influences football players' CRBs reflect system-level influences that go beyond individual-level factors. DESIGN: Qualitative study. SETTING: Four National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I university athletic programs. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 26 individuals (athletic directors = 5, athletic trainers [ATs] = 10, football coaches = 11). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Semistructured interviews with stakeholders were transcribed and analyzed using the socioecological model according to the Miles and Huberman coding methods. RESULTS: Stakeholders largely identified individual-level factors (attitudes), followed by exosystem-level factors (university policies and support for ATs), with fewer microsystem- and mesosystem-level factors (coach influence and communication between coaches and ATs, respectively) and almost no macrosystem-level factors (media influence, cultural norms about aggression and toughness in football). CONCLUSIONS: Promising evidence indicates growing stakeholder awareness of the importance of exosystem-level factors (eg, medical personnel and CRB policies) in influencing CRB rates. However, frontline stakeholders and policy makers may benefit from practices that bridge these influences (eg, coach involvement and communication), allowing for a more integrated approach to influence student-athletes' willingness to improve their CRBs.",
keywords = "head trauma, mild traumatic brain injuries, theories",
author = "Lininger, {Monica R.} and Wayment, {Heidi A} and Craig, {Deborah I} and Huffman, {Ann H} and Lane, {Taylor S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4085/1062-6050-47-18",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "21--29",
journal = "Journal of Athletic Training",
issn = "1062-6050",
publisher = "National Athletic Trainers' Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving Concussion-Reporting Behavior in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Football Players

T2 - Evidence for the Applicability of the Socioecological Model for Athletic Trainers

AU - Lininger, Monica R.

AU - Wayment, Heidi A

AU - Craig, Deborah I

AU - Huffman, Ann H

AU - Lane, Taylor S.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - CONTEXT: Few researchers have examined the views of important stakeholders in football student-athletes' spheres of influence and whether their views map well in a systems approach to understanding concussion-reporting behavior (CRB). OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which stakeholders' beliefs about what influences football players' CRBs reflect system-level influences that go beyond individual-level factors. DESIGN: Qualitative study. SETTING: Four National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I university athletic programs. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 26 individuals (athletic directors = 5, athletic trainers [ATs] = 10, football coaches = 11). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Semistructured interviews with stakeholders were transcribed and analyzed using the socioecological model according to the Miles and Huberman coding methods. RESULTS: Stakeholders largely identified individual-level factors (attitudes), followed by exosystem-level factors (university policies and support for ATs), with fewer microsystem- and mesosystem-level factors (coach influence and communication between coaches and ATs, respectively) and almost no macrosystem-level factors (media influence, cultural norms about aggression and toughness in football). CONCLUSIONS: Promising evidence indicates growing stakeholder awareness of the importance of exosystem-level factors (eg, medical personnel and CRB policies) in influencing CRB rates. However, frontline stakeholders and policy makers may benefit from practices that bridge these influences (eg, coach involvement and communication), allowing for a more integrated approach to influence student-athletes' willingness to improve their CRBs.

AB - CONTEXT: Few researchers have examined the views of important stakeholders in football student-athletes' spheres of influence and whether their views map well in a systems approach to understanding concussion-reporting behavior (CRB). OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which stakeholders' beliefs about what influences football players' CRBs reflect system-level influences that go beyond individual-level factors. DESIGN: Qualitative study. SETTING: Four National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I university athletic programs. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 26 individuals (athletic directors = 5, athletic trainers [ATs] = 10, football coaches = 11). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Semistructured interviews with stakeholders were transcribed and analyzed using the socioecological model according to the Miles and Huberman coding methods. RESULTS: Stakeholders largely identified individual-level factors (attitudes), followed by exosystem-level factors (university policies and support for ATs), with fewer microsystem- and mesosystem-level factors (coach influence and communication between coaches and ATs, respectively) and almost no macrosystem-level factors (media influence, cultural norms about aggression and toughness in football). CONCLUSIONS: Promising evidence indicates growing stakeholder awareness of the importance of exosystem-level factors (eg, medical personnel and CRB policies) in influencing CRB rates. However, frontline stakeholders and policy makers may benefit from practices that bridge these influences (eg, coach involvement and communication), allowing for a more integrated approach to influence student-athletes' willingness to improve their CRBs.

KW - head trauma

KW - mild traumatic brain injuries

KW - theories

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062617017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062617017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4085/1062-6050-47-18

DO - 10.4085/1062-6050-47-18

M3 - Article

C2 - 30721092

AN - SCOPUS:85062617017

VL - 54

SP - 21

EP - 29

JO - Journal of Athletic Training

JF - Journal of Athletic Training

SN - 1062-6050

IS - 1

ER -