Impact of large-scale climate extremes on biospheric carbon fluxes: An intercomparison based on MsTMIP data

Jakob Zscheischler, Anna M. Michalak, Christopher R Schwalm, Miguel D. Mahecha, Deborah N Huntzinger, Markus Reichstein, Gwenaëlle Berthier, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Cook, Bassil El-Masri, Maoyi Huang, Akihiko Ito, Atul Jain, Anthony King, Huimin Lei, Chaoqun Lu, Jiafu Mao, Shushi Peng, Benjamin Poulter, Daniel RicciutoXiaoying Shi, Bo Tao, Hanqin Tian, Nicolas Viovy, Weile Wang, Yaxing Wei, Jia Yang, Ning Zeng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Understanding the role of climate extremes and their impact on the carbon (C) cycle is increasingly a focus of Earth system science. Climate extremes such as droughts, heat waves, or heavy precipitation events can cause substantial changes in terrestrial C fluxes. On the other hand, extreme changes in C fluxes are often, but not always, driven by extreme climate conditions. Here we present an analysis of how extremes in temperature and precipitation, and extreme changes in terrestrial C fluxes are related to each other in 10 state-of-the-art terrestrial carbon models, all driven by the same climate forcing. We use model outputs from the North American Carbon Program Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP). A global-scale analysis shows that both droughts and heat waves translate into anomalous net releases of CO2 from the land surface via different mechanisms: Droughts largely decrease gross primary production (GPP) and to a lower extent total respiration (TR), while heat waves slightly decrease GPP but increase TR. Cold and wet periods have a smaller opposite effect. Analyzing extremes in C fluxes reveals that extreme changes in GPP and TR are often caused by strong shifts in water availability, but for extremes in TR shifts in temperature are also important. Extremes in net CO2 exchange are equally strongly driven by deviations in temperature and precipitation. Models mostly agree on the sign of the C flux response to climate extremes, but model spread is large. In tropical forests, C cycle extremes are driven by water availability, whereas in boreal forests temperature plays a more important role. Models are particularly uncertain about the C flux response to extreme heat in boreal forests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)585-600
Number of pages16
JournalGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Biospherics
carbon flux
Carbon
Fluxes
Drought
climate
respiration
primary production
drought
water availability
boreal forest
carbon
temperature
Availability
Temperature
Systems science
climate forcing
Water
Precipitation (meteorology)
climate conditions

Keywords

  • climate extremes
  • extreme events
  • model intercomparison
  • MsTMIP
  • spatiotemporal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry

Cite this

Impact of large-scale climate extremes on biospheric carbon fluxes : An intercomparison based on MsTMIP data. / Zscheischler, Jakob; Michalak, Anna M.; Schwalm, Christopher R; Mahecha, Miguel D.; Huntzinger, Deborah N; Reichstein, Markus; Berthier, Gwenaëlle; Ciais, Philippe; Cook, Robert B.; El-Masri, Bassil; Huang, Maoyi; Ito, Akihiko; Jain, Atul; King, Anthony; Lei, Huimin; Lu, Chaoqun; Mao, Jiafu; Peng, Shushi; Poulter, Benjamin; Ricciuto, Daniel; Shi, Xiaoying; Tao, Bo; Tian, Hanqin; Viovy, Nicolas; Wang, Weile; Wei, Yaxing; Yang, Jia; Zeng, Ning.

In: Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 28, No. 6, 2014, p. 585-600.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zscheischler, J, Michalak, AM, Schwalm, CR, Mahecha, MD, Huntzinger, DN, Reichstein, M, Berthier, G, Ciais, P, Cook, RB, El-Masri, B, Huang, M, Ito, A, Jain, A, King, A, Lei, H, Lu, C, Mao, J, Peng, S, Poulter, B, Ricciuto, D, Shi, X, Tao, B, Tian, H, Viovy, N, Wang, W, Wei, Y, Yang, J & Zeng, N 2014, 'Impact of large-scale climate extremes on biospheric carbon fluxes: An intercomparison based on MsTMIP data', Global Biogeochemical Cycles, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 585-600. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004826
Zscheischler, Jakob ; Michalak, Anna M. ; Schwalm, Christopher R ; Mahecha, Miguel D. ; Huntzinger, Deborah N ; Reichstein, Markus ; Berthier, Gwenaëlle ; Ciais, Philippe ; Cook, Robert B. ; El-Masri, Bassil ; Huang, Maoyi ; Ito, Akihiko ; Jain, Atul ; King, Anthony ; Lei, Huimin ; Lu, Chaoqun ; Mao, Jiafu ; Peng, Shushi ; Poulter, Benjamin ; Ricciuto, Daniel ; Shi, Xiaoying ; Tao, Bo ; Tian, Hanqin ; Viovy, Nicolas ; Wang, Weile ; Wei, Yaxing ; Yang, Jia ; Zeng, Ning. / Impact of large-scale climate extremes on biospheric carbon fluxes : An intercomparison based on MsTMIP data. In: Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 2014 ; Vol. 28, No. 6. pp. 585-600.
@article{123e8661ca78472483024c5d081219a4,
title = "Impact of large-scale climate extremes on biospheric carbon fluxes: An intercomparison based on MsTMIP data",
abstract = "Understanding the role of climate extremes and their impact on the carbon (C) cycle is increasingly a focus of Earth system science. Climate extremes such as droughts, heat waves, or heavy precipitation events can cause substantial changes in terrestrial C fluxes. On the other hand, extreme changes in C fluxes are often, but not always, driven by extreme climate conditions. Here we present an analysis of how extremes in temperature and precipitation, and extreme changes in terrestrial C fluxes are related to each other in 10 state-of-the-art terrestrial carbon models, all driven by the same climate forcing. We use model outputs from the North American Carbon Program Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP). A global-scale analysis shows that both droughts and heat waves translate into anomalous net releases of CO2 from the land surface via different mechanisms: Droughts largely decrease gross primary production (GPP) and to a lower extent total respiration (TR), while heat waves slightly decrease GPP but increase TR. Cold and wet periods have a smaller opposite effect. Analyzing extremes in C fluxes reveals that extreme changes in GPP and TR are often caused by strong shifts in water availability, but for extremes in TR shifts in temperature are also important. Extremes in net CO2 exchange are equally strongly driven by deviations in temperature and precipitation. Models mostly agree on the sign of the C flux response to climate extremes, but model spread is large. In tropical forests, C cycle extremes are driven by water availability, whereas in boreal forests temperature plays a more important role. Models are particularly uncertain about the C flux response to extreme heat in boreal forests.",
keywords = "climate extremes, extreme events, model intercomparison, MsTMIP, spatiotemporal",
author = "Jakob Zscheischler and Michalak, {Anna M.} and Schwalm, {Christopher R} and Mahecha, {Miguel D.} and Huntzinger, {Deborah N} and Markus Reichstein and Gwena{\"e}lle Berthier and Philippe Ciais and Cook, {Robert B.} and Bassil El-Masri and Maoyi Huang and Akihiko Ito and Atul Jain and Anthony King and Huimin Lei and Chaoqun Lu and Jiafu Mao and Shushi Peng and Benjamin Poulter and Daniel Ricciuto and Xiaoying Shi and Bo Tao and Hanqin Tian and Nicolas Viovy and Weile Wang and Yaxing Wei and Jia Yang and Ning Zeng",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1002/2014GB004826",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "585--600",
journal = "Global Biogeochemical Cycles",
issn = "0886-6236",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of large-scale climate extremes on biospheric carbon fluxes

T2 - An intercomparison based on MsTMIP data

AU - Zscheischler, Jakob

AU - Michalak, Anna M.

AU - Schwalm, Christopher R

AU - Mahecha, Miguel D.

AU - Huntzinger, Deborah N

AU - Reichstein, Markus

AU - Berthier, Gwenaëlle

AU - Ciais, Philippe

AU - Cook, Robert B.

AU - El-Masri, Bassil

AU - Huang, Maoyi

AU - Ito, Akihiko

AU - Jain, Atul

AU - King, Anthony

AU - Lei, Huimin

AU - Lu, Chaoqun

AU - Mao, Jiafu

AU - Peng, Shushi

AU - Poulter, Benjamin

AU - Ricciuto, Daniel

AU - Shi, Xiaoying

AU - Tao, Bo

AU - Tian, Hanqin

AU - Viovy, Nicolas

AU - Wang, Weile

AU - Wei, Yaxing

AU - Yang, Jia

AU - Zeng, Ning

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Understanding the role of climate extremes and their impact on the carbon (C) cycle is increasingly a focus of Earth system science. Climate extremes such as droughts, heat waves, or heavy precipitation events can cause substantial changes in terrestrial C fluxes. On the other hand, extreme changes in C fluxes are often, but not always, driven by extreme climate conditions. Here we present an analysis of how extremes in temperature and precipitation, and extreme changes in terrestrial C fluxes are related to each other in 10 state-of-the-art terrestrial carbon models, all driven by the same climate forcing. We use model outputs from the North American Carbon Program Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP). A global-scale analysis shows that both droughts and heat waves translate into anomalous net releases of CO2 from the land surface via different mechanisms: Droughts largely decrease gross primary production (GPP) and to a lower extent total respiration (TR), while heat waves slightly decrease GPP but increase TR. Cold and wet periods have a smaller opposite effect. Analyzing extremes in C fluxes reveals that extreme changes in GPP and TR are often caused by strong shifts in water availability, but for extremes in TR shifts in temperature are also important. Extremes in net CO2 exchange are equally strongly driven by deviations in temperature and precipitation. Models mostly agree on the sign of the C flux response to climate extremes, but model spread is large. In tropical forests, C cycle extremes are driven by water availability, whereas in boreal forests temperature plays a more important role. Models are particularly uncertain about the C flux response to extreme heat in boreal forests.

AB - Understanding the role of climate extremes and their impact on the carbon (C) cycle is increasingly a focus of Earth system science. Climate extremes such as droughts, heat waves, or heavy precipitation events can cause substantial changes in terrestrial C fluxes. On the other hand, extreme changes in C fluxes are often, but not always, driven by extreme climate conditions. Here we present an analysis of how extremes in temperature and precipitation, and extreme changes in terrestrial C fluxes are related to each other in 10 state-of-the-art terrestrial carbon models, all driven by the same climate forcing. We use model outputs from the North American Carbon Program Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP). A global-scale analysis shows that both droughts and heat waves translate into anomalous net releases of CO2 from the land surface via different mechanisms: Droughts largely decrease gross primary production (GPP) and to a lower extent total respiration (TR), while heat waves slightly decrease GPP but increase TR. Cold and wet periods have a smaller opposite effect. Analyzing extremes in C fluxes reveals that extreme changes in GPP and TR are often caused by strong shifts in water availability, but for extremes in TR shifts in temperature are also important. Extremes in net CO2 exchange are equally strongly driven by deviations in temperature and precipitation. Models mostly agree on the sign of the C flux response to climate extremes, but model spread is large. In tropical forests, C cycle extremes are driven by water availability, whereas in boreal forests temperature plays a more important role. Models are particularly uncertain about the C flux response to extreme heat in boreal forests.

KW - climate extremes

KW - extreme events

KW - model intercomparison

KW - MsTMIP

KW - spatiotemporal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901731308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901731308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/2014GB004826

DO - 10.1002/2014GB004826

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84901731308

VL - 28

SP - 585

EP - 600

JO - Global Biogeochemical Cycles

JF - Global Biogeochemical Cycles

SN - 0886-6236

IS - 6

ER -