Identifying effective writing tasks for use in EFL write-to-learn language contexts

Kim McDonough, William J Crawford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared the effectiveness of two writing tasks at encouraging Thai EFL students (N = 67) to deploy their linguistic knowledge. Students were randomly assigned to respond to one of two writing tasks with different levels of topic familiarity, which was operationalised as ±personal experience. The students completed a Likert-scale questionnaire that elicited their perceptions about the writing task. The paragraphs were assessed using an analytic rubric and were coded for linguistic features relevant to the students’ EFL class: accuracy (errors/word), subordination (dependent clauses/independent clauses) and use of future verb forms (simple future, present continuous and going to). The +personal experience paragraphs had higher ratings, greater subordination and more target verb forms, but there were no differences in accuracy. Students reported that they were more able to use their linguistic knowledge when writing about the familiar topic, and there was a positive correlation between their perceptions and text features.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalLanguage Learning Journal
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 3 2018

Fingerprint

language
linguistics
student
experience
rating
Language
questionnaire
present
Personal Experience
Subordination
Verb Forms
Paragraph
Linguistic Knowledge
Simple Future
Independent Clauses
Dependent Clauses
Linguistic Features
Topic Familiarity
Rating
Questionnaire

Keywords

  • accuracy
  • EFL
  • subordination
  • topic familiarity
  • Write to learn language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Identifying effective writing tasks for use in EFL write-to-learn language contexts. / McDonough, Kim; Crawford, William J.

In: Language Learning Journal, 03.05.2018, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3d6122d747ed4113b6598215190ce559,
title = "Identifying effective writing tasks for use in EFL write-to-learn language contexts",
abstract = "This study compared the effectiveness of two writing tasks at encouraging Thai EFL students (N = 67) to deploy their linguistic knowledge. Students were randomly assigned to respond to one of two writing tasks with different levels of topic familiarity, which was operationalised as ±personal experience. The students completed a Likert-scale questionnaire that elicited their perceptions about the writing task. The paragraphs were assessed using an analytic rubric and were coded for linguistic features relevant to the students’ EFL class: accuracy (errors/word), subordination (dependent clauses/independent clauses) and use of future verb forms (simple future, present continuous and going to). The +personal experience paragraphs had higher ratings, greater subordination and more target verb forms, but there were no differences in accuracy. Students reported that they were more able to use their linguistic knowledge when writing about the familiar topic, and there was a positive correlation between their perceptions and text features.",
keywords = "accuracy, EFL, subordination, topic familiarity, Write to learn language",
author = "Kim McDonough and Crawford, {William J}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/09571736.2018.1465990",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Language Learning Journal",
issn = "0957-1736",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying effective writing tasks for use in EFL write-to-learn language contexts

AU - McDonough, Kim

AU - Crawford, William J

PY - 2018/5/3

Y1 - 2018/5/3

N2 - This study compared the effectiveness of two writing tasks at encouraging Thai EFL students (N = 67) to deploy their linguistic knowledge. Students were randomly assigned to respond to one of two writing tasks with different levels of topic familiarity, which was operationalised as ±personal experience. The students completed a Likert-scale questionnaire that elicited their perceptions about the writing task. The paragraphs were assessed using an analytic rubric and were coded for linguistic features relevant to the students’ EFL class: accuracy (errors/word), subordination (dependent clauses/independent clauses) and use of future verb forms (simple future, present continuous and going to). The +personal experience paragraphs had higher ratings, greater subordination and more target verb forms, but there were no differences in accuracy. Students reported that they were more able to use their linguistic knowledge when writing about the familiar topic, and there was a positive correlation between their perceptions and text features.

AB - This study compared the effectiveness of two writing tasks at encouraging Thai EFL students (N = 67) to deploy their linguistic knowledge. Students were randomly assigned to respond to one of two writing tasks with different levels of topic familiarity, which was operationalised as ±personal experience. The students completed a Likert-scale questionnaire that elicited their perceptions about the writing task. The paragraphs were assessed using an analytic rubric and were coded for linguistic features relevant to the students’ EFL class: accuracy (errors/word), subordination (dependent clauses/independent clauses) and use of future verb forms (simple future, present continuous and going to). The +personal experience paragraphs had higher ratings, greater subordination and more target verb forms, but there were no differences in accuracy. Students reported that they were more able to use their linguistic knowledge when writing about the familiar topic, and there was a positive correlation between their perceptions and text features.

KW - accuracy

KW - EFL

KW - subordination

KW - topic familiarity

KW - Write to learn language

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046466660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046466660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09571736.2018.1465990

DO - 10.1080/09571736.2018.1465990

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046466660

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Language Learning Journal

JF - Language Learning Journal

SN - 0957-1736

ER -