How do states benefit from nonstate governance? Evidence from forest sustainability certification

Jesse Abrams, Erik Nielsen, Diana Diaz, Theresa Selfa, Erika Adams, Jennifer L. Dunn, Cassandra Moseley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Forest sustainability certification is emblematic of governance mechanisms associated with neoliberal state reforms. Despite being conceived as a means of compensating for the unwillingness or inability of states to regulate forest practices, in practice, forest certification has come to entail complex and hybrid relationships between private-sector, civil society, and government actors. Indeed, states have increasingly embraced certification as a means of complementing or even supplanting traditional forms of governmental regulation of the forest sector. Yet processes of neoliberalization imply both an expansion of opportunities for hybrid governance and a weakening of the state capacity that is often needed for successful implementation of certification initiatives. We analyze the complex relationships between neoliberalization, state capacity, and certification through two contrasting cases in Wisconsin, United States, and Entre Ríos, Argentina. Our findings illustrate the tensions within broadly neoliberal and postneoliberal regimes and highlight the persistence of long-standing patterns of state-led environmental governance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)66-85
Number of pages20
JournalGlobal Environmental Politics
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

certification
Sustainable development
Lead
sustainability
governance
evidence
civil society
private sector
Argentina
persistence
regime
regulation
reform

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

How do states benefit from nonstate governance? Evidence from forest sustainability certification. / Abrams, Jesse; Nielsen, Erik; Diaz, Diana; Selfa, Theresa; Adams, Erika; Dunn, Jennifer L.; Moseley, Cassandra.

In: Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.08.2018, p. 66-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abrams, Jesse ; Nielsen, Erik ; Diaz, Diana ; Selfa, Theresa ; Adams, Erika ; Dunn, Jennifer L. ; Moseley, Cassandra. / How do states benefit from nonstate governance? Evidence from forest sustainability certification. In: Global Environmental Politics. 2018 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 66-85.
@article{f3a5bd9aa0614f70b03bb55752fda6c9,
title = "How do states benefit from nonstate governance? Evidence from forest sustainability certification",
abstract = "Forest sustainability certification is emblematic of governance mechanisms associated with neoliberal state reforms. Despite being conceived as a means of compensating for the unwillingness or inability of states to regulate forest practices, in practice, forest certification has come to entail complex and hybrid relationships between private-sector, civil society, and government actors. Indeed, states have increasingly embraced certification as a means of complementing or even supplanting traditional forms of governmental regulation of the forest sector. Yet processes of neoliberalization imply both an expansion of opportunities for hybrid governance and a weakening of the state capacity that is often needed for successful implementation of certification initiatives. We analyze the complex relationships between neoliberalization, state capacity, and certification through two contrasting cases in Wisconsin, United States, and Entre R{\'i}os, Argentina. Our findings illustrate the tensions within broadly neoliberal and postneoliberal regimes and highlight the persistence of long-standing patterns of state-led environmental governance.",
author = "Jesse Abrams and Erik Nielsen and Diana Diaz and Theresa Selfa and Erika Adams and Dunn, {Jennifer L.} and Cassandra Moseley",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1162/glep_a_00470",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "66--85",
journal = "Global Environmental Politics",
issn = "1526-3800",
publisher = "MIT Press Journals",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do states benefit from nonstate governance? Evidence from forest sustainability certification

AU - Abrams, Jesse

AU - Nielsen, Erik

AU - Diaz, Diana

AU - Selfa, Theresa

AU - Adams, Erika

AU - Dunn, Jennifer L.

AU - Moseley, Cassandra

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Forest sustainability certification is emblematic of governance mechanisms associated with neoliberal state reforms. Despite being conceived as a means of compensating for the unwillingness or inability of states to regulate forest practices, in practice, forest certification has come to entail complex and hybrid relationships between private-sector, civil society, and government actors. Indeed, states have increasingly embraced certification as a means of complementing or even supplanting traditional forms of governmental regulation of the forest sector. Yet processes of neoliberalization imply both an expansion of opportunities for hybrid governance and a weakening of the state capacity that is often needed for successful implementation of certification initiatives. We analyze the complex relationships between neoliberalization, state capacity, and certification through two contrasting cases in Wisconsin, United States, and Entre Ríos, Argentina. Our findings illustrate the tensions within broadly neoliberal and postneoliberal regimes and highlight the persistence of long-standing patterns of state-led environmental governance.

AB - Forest sustainability certification is emblematic of governance mechanisms associated with neoliberal state reforms. Despite being conceived as a means of compensating for the unwillingness or inability of states to regulate forest practices, in practice, forest certification has come to entail complex and hybrid relationships between private-sector, civil society, and government actors. Indeed, states have increasingly embraced certification as a means of complementing or even supplanting traditional forms of governmental regulation of the forest sector. Yet processes of neoliberalization imply both an expansion of opportunities for hybrid governance and a weakening of the state capacity that is often needed for successful implementation of certification initiatives. We analyze the complex relationships between neoliberalization, state capacity, and certification through two contrasting cases in Wisconsin, United States, and Entre Ríos, Argentina. Our findings illustrate the tensions within broadly neoliberal and postneoliberal regimes and highlight the persistence of long-standing patterns of state-led environmental governance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051568744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051568744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1162/glep_a_00470

DO - 10.1162/glep_a_00470

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 66

EP - 85

JO - Global Environmental Politics

JF - Global Environmental Politics

SN - 1526-3800

IS - 3

ER -