How are we doing? The impact of motives and information use on the evaluation of romantic relationships

Heidi A Wayment, Susan Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A multidimensional model of self-evaluation was modified to examine individuals' perceptions of how they evaluate their romantic relationships. Participants provided estimates of the frequency and usefulness of 10 types of information (objective information, feedback from others, personal standards, feared future relationships, future ideals, positive and negative past relationship information, upward, lateral, and downward social comparison) for meeting four motives (enhancement, improvement, verification, and accuracy) in the context of a romantic relationship. Results from three studies indicate that, overall, personal standards, objective information, and future ideals information were perceived as being used most often to evaluate one's romantic relationship. These types of information were reported as being most useful for meeting all four motives. Social comparison information was reported as least useful and used least often for relationship evaluation. The discussion focuses on the usefulness of considering multiple motives and information types in order to understand how individuals may be evaluating their romantic relationships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-52
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Social and Personal Relationships
Volume17
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Information use
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
evaluation
Feedback

Keywords

  • Evaluation motives
  • Personal standards
  • Relationship evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Communication

Cite this

How are we doing? The impact of motives and information use on the evaluation of romantic relationships. / Wayment, Heidi A; Campbell, Susan.

In: Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2000, p. 31-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b89fd7e858594772b3ebc8d439a41ef7,
title = "How are we doing? The impact of motives and information use on the evaluation of romantic relationships",
abstract = "A multidimensional model of self-evaluation was modified to examine individuals' perceptions of how they evaluate their romantic relationships. Participants provided estimates of the frequency and usefulness of 10 types of information (objective information, feedback from others, personal standards, feared future relationships, future ideals, positive and negative past relationship information, upward, lateral, and downward social comparison) for meeting four motives (enhancement, improvement, verification, and accuracy) in the context of a romantic relationship. Results from three studies indicate that, overall, personal standards, objective information, and future ideals information were perceived as being used most often to evaluate one's romantic relationship. These types of information were reported as being most useful for meeting all four motives. Social comparison information was reported as least useful and used least often for relationship evaluation. The discussion focuses on the usefulness of considering multiple motives and information types in order to understand how individuals may be evaluating their romantic relationships.",
keywords = "Evaluation motives, Personal standards, Relationship evaluation",
author = "Wayment, {Heidi A} and Susan Campbell",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "31--52",
journal = "Journal of Social and Personal Relationships",
issn = "0265-4075",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How are we doing? The impact of motives and information use on the evaluation of romantic relationships

AU - Wayment, Heidi A

AU - Campbell, Susan

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - A multidimensional model of self-evaluation was modified to examine individuals' perceptions of how they evaluate their romantic relationships. Participants provided estimates of the frequency and usefulness of 10 types of information (objective information, feedback from others, personal standards, feared future relationships, future ideals, positive and negative past relationship information, upward, lateral, and downward social comparison) for meeting four motives (enhancement, improvement, verification, and accuracy) in the context of a romantic relationship. Results from three studies indicate that, overall, personal standards, objective information, and future ideals information were perceived as being used most often to evaluate one's romantic relationship. These types of information were reported as being most useful for meeting all four motives. Social comparison information was reported as least useful and used least often for relationship evaluation. The discussion focuses on the usefulness of considering multiple motives and information types in order to understand how individuals may be evaluating their romantic relationships.

AB - A multidimensional model of self-evaluation was modified to examine individuals' perceptions of how they evaluate their romantic relationships. Participants provided estimates of the frequency and usefulness of 10 types of information (objective information, feedback from others, personal standards, feared future relationships, future ideals, positive and negative past relationship information, upward, lateral, and downward social comparison) for meeting four motives (enhancement, improvement, verification, and accuracy) in the context of a romantic relationship. Results from three studies indicate that, overall, personal standards, objective information, and future ideals information were perceived as being used most often to evaluate one's romantic relationship. These types of information were reported as being most useful for meeting all four motives. Social comparison information was reported as least useful and used least often for relationship evaluation. The discussion focuses on the usefulness of considering multiple motives and information types in order to understand how individuals may be evaluating their romantic relationships.

KW - Evaluation motives

KW - Personal standards

KW - Relationship evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034424567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034424567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034424567

VL - 17

SP - 31

EP - 52

JO - Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

JF - Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

SN - 0265-4075

IS - 1

ER -