Historical patterns for the grammatical marking of stance: A cross-register comparison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

English has a rich supply of grammatical devices used to express “stance”, epistemic or attitudinal comments on propositional information. The present paper explores historical change in the preferred devices used to mark stance. By examining the entire system of stance devices, the study attempts to investigate the underlying patterns of change. Three major patterns are possible: (1) changes in social norms could result in speakers and writers expressing stance meanings to differing extents in different periods; (2) the grammatical system for the expression of stance could undergo change, showing an overall decline in the use of some grammatical devices, replaced by an increase in the use of other devices; (3) the patterns of use could undergo sharper register diversification over time, with particular stance devices taking on more specialized uses in particular registers. These possibilities are explored through corpus-based analysis of the written and speech-based registers in the ARCHER corpus, tracking the patterns of change across the past three centuries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-136
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Historical Pragmatics
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

Social Norms
diversification
writer
supply
Stance
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Historical patterns for the grammatical marking of stance : A cross-register comparison. / Biber, Douglas E.

In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.2004, p. 107-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7df0514af9244cae869db1dcdfdd7505,
title = "Historical patterns for the grammatical marking of stance: A cross-register comparison",
abstract = "English has a rich supply of grammatical devices used to express “stance”, epistemic or attitudinal comments on propositional information. The present paper explores historical change in the preferred devices used to mark stance. By examining the entire system of stance devices, the study attempts to investigate the underlying patterns of change. Three major patterns are possible: (1) changes in social norms could result in speakers and writers expressing stance meanings to differing extents in different periods; (2) the grammatical system for the expression of stance could undergo change, showing an overall decline in the use of some grammatical devices, replaced by an increase in the use of other devices; (3) the patterns of use could undergo sharper register diversification over time, with particular stance devices taking on more specialized uses in particular registers. These possibilities are explored through corpus-based analysis of the written and speech-based registers in the ARCHER corpus, tracking the patterns of change across the past three centuries.",
author = "Biber, {Douglas E}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1075/jhp.5.1.06bib",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "107--136",
journal = "Journal of Historical Pragmatics",
issn = "1566-5852",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Historical patterns for the grammatical marking of stance

T2 - A cross-register comparison

AU - Biber, Douglas E

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - English has a rich supply of grammatical devices used to express “stance”, epistemic or attitudinal comments on propositional information. The present paper explores historical change in the preferred devices used to mark stance. By examining the entire system of stance devices, the study attempts to investigate the underlying patterns of change. Three major patterns are possible: (1) changes in social norms could result in speakers and writers expressing stance meanings to differing extents in different periods; (2) the grammatical system for the expression of stance could undergo change, showing an overall decline in the use of some grammatical devices, replaced by an increase in the use of other devices; (3) the patterns of use could undergo sharper register diversification over time, with particular stance devices taking on more specialized uses in particular registers. These possibilities are explored through corpus-based analysis of the written and speech-based registers in the ARCHER corpus, tracking the patterns of change across the past three centuries.

AB - English has a rich supply of grammatical devices used to express “stance”, epistemic or attitudinal comments on propositional information. The present paper explores historical change in the preferred devices used to mark stance. By examining the entire system of stance devices, the study attempts to investigate the underlying patterns of change. Three major patterns are possible: (1) changes in social norms could result in speakers and writers expressing stance meanings to differing extents in different periods; (2) the grammatical system for the expression of stance could undergo change, showing an overall decline in the use of some grammatical devices, replaced by an increase in the use of other devices; (3) the patterns of use could undergo sharper register diversification over time, with particular stance devices taking on more specialized uses in particular registers. These possibilities are explored through corpus-based analysis of the written and speech-based registers in the ARCHER corpus, tracking the patterns of change across the past three centuries.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751505221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751505221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1075/jhp.5.1.06bib

DO - 10.1075/jhp.5.1.06bib

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33751505221

VL - 5

SP - 107

EP - 136

JO - Journal of Historical Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Historical Pragmatics

SN - 1566-5852

IS - 1

ER -