Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use

Douglas E Biber, Bethany Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many discussions of grammatical change have focused on grammatical innovation in the discourse contexts of conversational interaction. We argue here that it is also possible for grammatical innovation to emerge out of the communicative demands of written discourse. In particular, the distinctive communicative characteristics of academic writing (informational prose) have led to the development of a discourse style that relies heavily on nominal structures, with extensive phrasal modification and a relative absence of verbs. By tracking the historical development of this discourse style, we can also observe the development of particular grammatical functions that are emerging in writing. We focus here on two grammatical features nouns as nominal premodifiers and prepositional phrases as nominal postmodifiers analyzing their historical development over the last four centuries in a corpus of academic research writing (compared to other registers such as fiction, newspaper reportage and conversation). Our analysis shows that these grammatical features were quite restricted in function and variability in earlier historical periods of English. However, in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, they became much more frequent and productive, accompanied by major extensions in their functions, variants, and range of lexical associations. These extensions were restricted primarily to informational written discourse, illustrating ways in which new grammatical functions emerge in writing rather than speech.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)223-250
Number of pages28
JournalEnglish Language and Linguistics
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

written language
discourse
historical development
innovation
newspaper
nineteenth century
twentieth century
conversation
Language Use
Written Language
Grammatical Change
Noun Phrase
interaction
Innovation
Written Discourse
Discourse
Grammatical Functions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Grammatical change in the noun phrase : The influence of written language use. / Biber, Douglas E; Gray, Bethany.

In: English Language and Linguistics, Vol. 15, No. 2, 07.2011, p. 223-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b827e99dcf9e40b8a766be3079a60e98,
title = "Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use",
abstract = "Many discussions of grammatical change have focused on grammatical innovation in the discourse contexts of conversational interaction. We argue here that it is also possible for grammatical innovation to emerge out of the communicative demands of written discourse. In particular, the distinctive communicative characteristics of academic writing (informational prose) have led to the development of a discourse style that relies heavily on nominal structures, with extensive phrasal modification and a relative absence of verbs. By tracking the historical development of this discourse style, we can also observe the development of particular grammatical functions that are emerging in writing. We focus here on two grammatical features nouns as nominal premodifiers and prepositional phrases as nominal postmodifiers analyzing their historical development over the last four centuries in a corpus of academic research writing (compared to other registers such as fiction, newspaper reportage and conversation). Our analysis shows that these grammatical features were quite restricted in function and variability in earlier historical periods of English. However, in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, they became much more frequent and productive, accompanied by major extensions in their functions, variants, and range of lexical associations. These extensions were restricted primarily to informational written discourse, illustrating ways in which new grammatical functions emerge in writing rather than speech.",
author = "Biber, {Douglas E} and Bethany Gray",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1017/S1360674311000025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "223--250",
journal = "English Language and Linguistics",
issn = "1360-6743",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Grammatical change in the noun phrase

T2 - The influence of written language use

AU - Biber, Douglas E

AU - Gray, Bethany

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Many discussions of grammatical change have focused on grammatical innovation in the discourse contexts of conversational interaction. We argue here that it is also possible for grammatical innovation to emerge out of the communicative demands of written discourse. In particular, the distinctive communicative characteristics of academic writing (informational prose) have led to the development of a discourse style that relies heavily on nominal structures, with extensive phrasal modification and a relative absence of verbs. By tracking the historical development of this discourse style, we can also observe the development of particular grammatical functions that are emerging in writing. We focus here on two grammatical features nouns as nominal premodifiers and prepositional phrases as nominal postmodifiers analyzing their historical development over the last four centuries in a corpus of academic research writing (compared to other registers such as fiction, newspaper reportage and conversation). Our analysis shows that these grammatical features were quite restricted in function and variability in earlier historical periods of English. However, in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, they became much more frequent and productive, accompanied by major extensions in their functions, variants, and range of lexical associations. These extensions were restricted primarily to informational written discourse, illustrating ways in which new grammatical functions emerge in writing rather than speech.

AB - Many discussions of grammatical change have focused on grammatical innovation in the discourse contexts of conversational interaction. We argue here that it is also possible for grammatical innovation to emerge out of the communicative demands of written discourse. In particular, the distinctive communicative characteristics of academic writing (informational prose) have led to the development of a discourse style that relies heavily on nominal structures, with extensive phrasal modification and a relative absence of verbs. By tracking the historical development of this discourse style, we can also observe the development of particular grammatical functions that are emerging in writing. We focus here on two grammatical features nouns as nominal premodifiers and prepositional phrases as nominal postmodifiers analyzing their historical development over the last four centuries in a corpus of academic research writing (compared to other registers such as fiction, newspaper reportage and conversation). Our analysis shows that these grammatical features were quite restricted in function and variability in earlier historical periods of English. However, in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, they became much more frequent and productive, accompanied by major extensions in their functions, variants, and range of lexical associations. These extensions were restricted primarily to informational written discourse, illustrating ways in which new grammatical functions emerge in writing rather than speech.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959516223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959516223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1360674311000025

DO - 10.1017/S1360674311000025

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79959516223

VL - 15

SP - 223

EP - 250

JO - English Language and Linguistics

JF - English Language and Linguistics

SN - 1360-6743

IS - 2

ER -