Governance, Representation and International Aid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The growth of the postwar 20th century international aid architecture has generated much debate over the successes and failures of aid, its changing forms and its challenges. This article uses this aid landscape to explore the representational or discursive power and authority of the aid donor over the aid recipient. It suggests that representations about what aid does, its modalities and dispensations reproduce a hegemonic discourse and that representational authority in diagnosing aid's problems and prescribing solutions resides generally on one side of the aid binary. It thus focuses on the hierarchical or asymmetric relations of power implied by such a binary, on the way development aid in particular has come to shape self-understandings of donors in relation to recipients, and on the discursive labour that enables such a construction. It also explores how the post-Washington consensus on poverty eradication has embedded neoliberal solutions to development. The reproduction of the hegemonic aid discourse is examined in reference to NGOs involved in the dispensing of aid in Southeast Asia by drawing on scholarly literature and field research in Southeast Asia and Washington DC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)630-652
Number of pages23
JournalThird World Quarterly
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

international aid
Southeast Asia
aid
recipient
governance
discourse
development aid
field research
non-governmental organization
poverty
labor
nongovernmental organization
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development

Cite this

Governance, Representation and International Aid. / Nair, Sheila.

In: Third World Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 4, 05.2013, p. 630-652.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f91757c366384d0d8437983df5514c8e,
title = "Governance, Representation and International Aid",
abstract = "The growth of the postwar 20th century international aid architecture has generated much debate over the successes and failures of aid, its changing forms and its challenges. This article uses this aid landscape to explore the representational or discursive power and authority of the aid donor over the aid recipient. It suggests that representations about what aid does, its modalities and dispensations reproduce a hegemonic discourse and that representational authority in diagnosing aid's problems and prescribing solutions resides generally on one side of the aid binary. It thus focuses on the hierarchical or asymmetric relations of power implied by such a binary, on the way development aid in particular has come to shape self-understandings of donors in relation to recipients, and on the discursive labour that enables such a construction. It also explores how the post-Washington consensus on poverty eradication has embedded neoliberal solutions to development. The reproduction of the hegemonic aid discourse is examined in reference to NGOs involved in the dispensing of aid in Southeast Asia by drawing on scholarly literature and field research in Southeast Asia and Washington DC.",
author = "Sheila Nair",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1080/01436597.2013.786287",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "630--652",
journal = "Third World Quarterly",
issn = "0143-6597",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governance, Representation and International Aid

AU - Nair, Sheila

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - The growth of the postwar 20th century international aid architecture has generated much debate over the successes and failures of aid, its changing forms and its challenges. This article uses this aid landscape to explore the representational or discursive power and authority of the aid donor over the aid recipient. It suggests that representations about what aid does, its modalities and dispensations reproduce a hegemonic discourse and that representational authority in diagnosing aid's problems and prescribing solutions resides generally on one side of the aid binary. It thus focuses on the hierarchical or asymmetric relations of power implied by such a binary, on the way development aid in particular has come to shape self-understandings of donors in relation to recipients, and on the discursive labour that enables such a construction. It also explores how the post-Washington consensus on poverty eradication has embedded neoliberal solutions to development. The reproduction of the hegemonic aid discourse is examined in reference to NGOs involved in the dispensing of aid in Southeast Asia by drawing on scholarly literature and field research in Southeast Asia and Washington DC.

AB - The growth of the postwar 20th century international aid architecture has generated much debate over the successes and failures of aid, its changing forms and its challenges. This article uses this aid landscape to explore the representational or discursive power and authority of the aid donor over the aid recipient. It suggests that representations about what aid does, its modalities and dispensations reproduce a hegemonic discourse and that representational authority in diagnosing aid's problems and prescribing solutions resides generally on one side of the aid binary. It thus focuses on the hierarchical or asymmetric relations of power implied by such a binary, on the way development aid in particular has come to shape self-understandings of donors in relation to recipients, and on the discursive labour that enables such a construction. It also explores how the post-Washington consensus on poverty eradication has embedded neoliberal solutions to development. The reproduction of the hegemonic aid discourse is examined in reference to NGOs involved in the dispensing of aid in Southeast Asia by drawing on scholarly literature and field research in Southeast Asia and Washington DC.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878902500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878902500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01436597.2013.786287

DO - 10.1080/01436597.2013.786287

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 630

EP - 652

JO - Third World Quarterly

JF - Third World Quarterly

SN - 0143-6597

IS - 4

ER -