Global vegetation biomass production efficiency constrained by models and observations

Yue He, Shushi Peng, Yongwen Liu, Xiangyi Li, Kai Wang, Philippe Ciais, M. Altaf Arain, Yuanyuan Fang, Joshua B. Fisher, Daniel Goll, Daniel Hayes, Deborah N. Huntzinger, Akihiko Ito, Atul K. Jain, Ivan A. Janssens, Jiafu Mao, Campioli Matteo, Anna M. Michalak, Changhui Peng, Josep PeñuelasBenjamin Poulter, Dahe Qin, Daniel M. Ricciuto, Kevin Schaefer, Christopher R. Schwalm, Xiaoying Shi, Hanqin Tian, Sara Vicca, Yaxing Wei, Ning Zeng, Qiuan Zhu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Plants use only a fraction of their photosynthetically derived carbon for biomass production (BP). The biomass production efficiency (BPE), defined as the ratio of BP to photosynthesis, and its variation across and within vegetation types is poorly understood, which hinders our capacity to accurately estimate carbon turnover times and carbon sinks. Here, we present a new global estimation of BPE obtained by combining field measurements from 113 sites with 14 carbon cycle models. Our best estimate of global BPE is 0.41 ± 0.05, excluding cropland. The largest BPE is found in boreal forests (0.48 ± 0.06) and the lowest in tropical forests (0.40 ± 0.04). Carbon cycle models overestimate BPE, although models with carbon–nitrogen interactions tend to be more realistic. Using observation-based estimates of global photosynthesis, we quantify the global BP of non-cropland ecosystems of 41 ± 6 Pg C/year. This flux is less than net primary production as it does not contain carbon allocated to symbionts, used for exudates or volatile carbon compound emissions to the atmosphere. Our study reveals a positive bias of 24 ± 11% in the model-estimated BP (10 of 14 models). When correcting models for this bias while leaving modeled carbon turnover times unchanged, we found that the global ecosystem carbon storage change during the last century is decreased by 67% (or 58 Pg C).

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalGlobal Change Biology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Biomass
Carbon
vegetation
biomass
carbon
Photosynthesis
carbon cycle
Ecosystems
turnover
photosynthesis
ecosystem
carbon sink
net primary production
symbiont
carbon sequestration
vegetation type
boreal forest
tropical forest
Fluxes
atmosphere

Keywords

  • biomass production
  • BPE
  • carbon sink
  • emergent constraint
  • terrestrial biosphere model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Global vegetation biomass production efficiency constrained by models and observations. / He, Yue; Peng, Shushi; Liu, Yongwen; Li, Xiangyi; Wang, Kai; Ciais, Philippe; Arain, M. Altaf; Fang, Yuanyuan; Fisher, Joshua B.; Goll, Daniel; Hayes, Daniel; Huntzinger, Deborah N.; Ito, Akihiko; Jain, Atul K.; Janssens, Ivan A.; Mao, Jiafu; Matteo, Campioli; Michalak, Anna M.; Peng, Changhui; Peñuelas, Josep; Poulter, Benjamin; Qin, Dahe; Ricciuto, Daniel M.; Schaefer, Kevin; Schwalm, Christopher R.; Shi, Xiaoying; Tian, Hanqin; Vicca, Sara; Wei, Yaxing; Zeng, Ning; Zhu, Qiuan.

In: Global Change Biology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

He, Y, Peng, S, Liu, Y, Li, X, Wang, K, Ciais, P, Arain, MA, Fang, Y, Fisher, JB, Goll, D, Hayes, D, Huntzinger, DN, Ito, A, Jain, AK, Janssens, IA, Mao, J, Matteo, C, Michalak, AM, Peng, C, Peñuelas, J, Poulter, B, Qin, D, Ricciuto, DM, Schaefer, K, Schwalm, CR, Shi, X, Tian, H, Vicca, S, Wei, Y, Zeng, N & Zhu, Q 2019, 'Global vegetation biomass production efficiency constrained by models and observations', Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14816
He, Yue ; Peng, Shushi ; Liu, Yongwen ; Li, Xiangyi ; Wang, Kai ; Ciais, Philippe ; Arain, M. Altaf ; Fang, Yuanyuan ; Fisher, Joshua B. ; Goll, Daniel ; Hayes, Daniel ; Huntzinger, Deborah N. ; Ito, Akihiko ; Jain, Atul K. ; Janssens, Ivan A. ; Mao, Jiafu ; Matteo, Campioli ; Michalak, Anna M. ; Peng, Changhui ; Peñuelas, Josep ; Poulter, Benjamin ; Qin, Dahe ; Ricciuto, Daniel M. ; Schaefer, Kevin ; Schwalm, Christopher R. ; Shi, Xiaoying ; Tian, Hanqin ; Vicca, Sara ; Wei, Yaxing ; Zeng, Ning ; Zhu, Qiuan. / Global vegetation biomass production efficiency constrained by models and observations. In: Global Change Biology. 2019.
@article{c863dc4782f9407b9b5ea61f23371398,
title = "Global vegetation biomass production efficiency constrained by models and observations",
abstract = "Plants use only a fraction of their photosynthetically derived carbon for biomass production (BP). The biomass production efficiency (BPE), defined as the ratio of BP to photosynthesis, and its variation across and within vegetation types is poorly understood, which hinders our capacity to accurately estimate carbon turnover times and carbon sinks. Here, we present a new global estimation of BPE obtained by combining field measurements from 113 sites with 14 carbon cycle models. Our best estimate of global BPE is 0.41 ± 0.05, excluding cropland. The largest BPE is found in boreal forests (0.48 ± 0.06) and the lowest in tropical forests (0.40 ± 0.04). Carbon cycle models overestimate BPE, although models with carbon–nitrogen interactions tend to be more realistic. Using observation-based estimates of global photosynthesis, we quantify the global BP of non-cropland ecosystems of 41 ± 6 Pg C/year. This flux is less than net primary production as it does not contain carbon allocated to symbionts, used for exudates or volatile carbon compound emissions to the atmosphere. Our study reveals a positive bias of 24 ± 11{\%} in the model-estimated BP (10 of 14 models). When correcting models for this bias while leaving modeled carbon turnover times unchanged, we found that the global ecosystem carbon storage change during the last century is decreased by 67{\%} (or 58 Pg C).",
keywords = "biomass production, BPE, carbon sink, emergent constraint, terrestrial biosphere model",
author = "Yue He and Shushi Peng and Yongwen Liu and Xiangyi Li and Kai Wang and Philippe Ciais and Arain, {M. Altaf} and Yuanyuan Fang and Fisher, {Joshua B.} and Daniel Goll and Daniel Hayes and Huntzinger, {Deborah N.} and Akihiko Ito and Jain, {Atul K.} and Janssens, {Ivan A.} and Jiafu Mao and Campioli Matteo and Michalak, {Anna M.} and Changhui Peng and Josep Pe{\~n}uelas and Benjamin Poulter and Dahe Qin and Ricciuto, {Daniel M.} and Kevin Schaefer and Schwalm, {Christopher R.} and Xiaoying Shi and Hanqin Tian and Sara Vicca and Yaxing Wei and Ning Zeng and Qiuan Zhu",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/gcb.14816",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Global Change Biology",
issn = "1354-1013",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Global vegetation biomass production efficiency constrained by models and observations

AU - He, Yue

AU - Peng, Shushi

AU - Liu, Yongwen

AU - Li, Xiangyi

AU - Wang, Kai

AU - Ciais, Philippe

AU - Arain, M. Altaf

AU - Fang, Yuanyuan

AU - Fisher, Joshua B.

AU - Goll, Daniel

AU - Hayes, Daniel

AU - Huntzinger, Deborah N.

AU - Ito, Akihiko

AU - Jain, Atul K.

AU - Janssens, Ivan A.

AU - Mao, Jiafu

AU - Matteo, Campioli

AU - Michalak, Anna M.

AU - Peng, Changhui

AU - Peñuelas, Josep

AU - Poulter, Benjamin

AU - Qin, Dahe

AU - Ricciuto, Daniel M.

AU - Schaefer, Kevin

AU - Schwalm, Christopher R.

AU - Shi, Xiaoying

AU - Tian, Hanqin

AU - Vicca, Sara

AU - Wei, Yaxing

AU - Zeng, Ning

AU - Zhu, Qiuan

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Plants use only a fraction of their photosynthetically derived carbon for biomass production (BP). The biomass production efficiency (BPE), defined as the ratio of BP to photosynthesis, and its variation across and within vegetation types is poorly understood, which hinders our capacity to accurately estimate carbon turnover times and carbon sinks. Here, we present a new global estimation of BPE obtained by combining field measurements from 113 sites with 14 carbon cycle models. Our best estimate of global BPE is 0.41 ± 0.05, excluding cropland. The largest BPE is found in boreal forests (0.48 ± 0.06) and the lowest in tropical forests (0.40 ± 0.04). Carbon cycle models overestimate BPE, although models with carbon–nitrogen interactions tend to be more realistic. Using observation-based estimates of global photosynthesis, we quantify the global BP of non-cropland ecosystems of 41 ± 6 Pg C/year. This flux is less than net primary production as it does not contain carbon allocated to symbionts, used for exudates or volatile carbon compound emissions to the atmosphere. Our study reveals a positive bias of 24 ± 11% in the model-estimated BP (10 of 14 models). When correcting models for this bias while leaving modeled carbon turnover times unchanged, we found that the global ecosystem carbon storage change during the last century is decreased by 67% (or 58 Pg C).

AB - Plants use only a fraction of their photosynthetically derived carbon for biomass production (BP). The biomass production efficiency (BPE), defined as the ratio of BP to photosynthesis, and its variation across and within vegetation types is poorly understood, which hinders our capacity to accurately estimate carbon turnover times and carbon sinks. Here, we present a new global estimation of BPE obtained by combining field measurements from 113 sites with 14 carbon cycle models. Our best estimate of global BPE is 0.41 ± 0.05, excluding cropland. The largest BPE is found in boreal forests (0.48 ± 0.06) and the lowest in tropical forests (0.40 ± 0.04). Carbon cycle models overestimate BPE, although models with carbon–nitrogen interactions tend to be more realistic. Using observation-based estimates of global photosynthesis, we quantify the global BP of non-cropland ecosystems of 41 ± 6 Pg C/year. This flux is less than net primary production as it does not contain carbon allocated to symbionts, used for exudates or volatile carbon compound emissions to the atmosphere. Our study reveals a positive bias of 24 ± 11% in the model-estimated BP (10 of 14 models). When correcting models for this bias while leaving modeled carbon turnover times unchanged, we found that the global ecosystem carbon storage change during the last century is decreased by 67% (or 58 Pg C).

KW - biomass production

KW - BPE

KW - carbon sink

KW - emergent constraint

KW - terrestrial biosphere model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073993200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073993200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/gcb.14816

DO - 10.1111/gcb.14816

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073993200

JO - Global Change Biology

JF - Global Change Biology

SN - 1354-1013

ER -