From Deep Structure to an Architecture in Suspense: Peter Eisenman, Structuralism, and Deconstruction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the events that led architect Peter Eisenman to abandon his earlier mode of working, exemplified by his houses of the sixties through the seventies, and to begin his “deconstruction” projects, such as the Wexner Center in Columbus, Ohio. Eisenman's early concerns centered on late-modernist understandings of form, structure, autonomy, self-sufficiency, and strict self-referentiality. Through his writings, Eisenman situated his work within related theoretical issues that were circulating in the fields of linguistics, painting, and sculpture, using them as examples, analogies, and theoretical support. These other related disciplines reached a limit in the quest for autonomy and self-sufficiency due to the limit immanent in the logic and rhetoric employed to achieve their goals. The same deconstruction occurred in other fields, eventually resulting in theories called poststructuralist. This article explores the process through which Eisenman met such an impasse in his early work and began a more self-consciously deconstruction mode of working. I also consider how Eisenman’s more recent work participates in an ongoing critique within cultural theory in general of institutions and power. Finally, I suggest that we reconsider just what deconstruction and post-modernism mean in architecture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)88-100
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Architectural Education
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

structuralism
self-sufficiency
Painting
Linguistics
autonomy
cultural theory
postmodernism
architect
rhetoric
linguistics
event
Peter Eisenman
Structuralism
Suspense
Deep Structure
Deconstruction
Autonomy
Self-sufficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts
  • Education
  • Architecture

Cite this

From Deep Structure to an Architecture in Suspense : Peter Eisenman, Structuralism, and Deconstruction. / Patin, Thomas.

In: Journal of Architectural Education, Vol. 47, No. 2, 01.11.1993, p. 88-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{096cda789baa4d46ac76f9e620c00cd2,
title = "From Deep Structure to an Architecture in Suspense: Peter Eisenman, Structuralism, and Deconstruction",
abstract = "This article examines the events that led architect Peter Eisenman to abandon his earlier mode of working, exemplified by his houses of the sixties through the seventies, and to begin his “deconstruction” projects, such as the Wexner Center in Columbus, Ohio. Eisenman's early concerns centered on late-modernist understandings of form, structure, autonomy, self-sufficiency, and strict self-referentiality. Through his writings, Eisenman situated his work within related theoretical issues that were circulating in the fields of linguistics, painting, and sculpture, using them as examples, analogies, and theoretical support. These other related disciplines reached a limit in the quest for autonomy and self-sufficiency due to the limit immanent in the logic and rhetoric employed to achieve their goals. The same deconstruction occurred in other fields, eventually resulting in theories called poststructuralist. This article explores the process through which Eisenman met such an impasse in his early work and began a more self-consciously deconstruction mode of working. I also consider how Eisenman’s more recent work participates in an ongoing critique within cultural theory in general of institutions and power. Finally, I suggest that we reconsider just what deconstruction and post-modernism mean in architecture.",
author = "Thomas Patin",
year = "1993",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10464883.1993.10734581",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "88--100",
journal = "Journal of Architectural Education",
issn = "1046-4883",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From Deep Structure to an Architecture in Suspense

T2 - Peter Eisenman, Structuralism, and Deconstruction

AU - Patin, Thomas

PY - 1993/11/1

Y1 - 1993/11/1

N2 - This article examines the events that led architect Peter Eisenman to abandon his earlier mode of working, exemplified by his houses of the sixties through the seventies, and to begin his “deconstruction” projects, such as the Wexner Center in Columbus, Ohio. Eisenman's early concerns centered on late-modernist understandings of form, structure, autonomy, self-sufficiency, and strict self-referentiality. Through his writings, Eisenman situated his work within related theoretical issues that were circulating in the fields of linguistics, painting, and sculpture, using them as examples, analogies, and theoretical support. These other related disciplines reached a limit in the quest for autonomy and self-sufficiency due to the limit immanent in the logic and rhetoric employed to achieve their goals. The same deconstruction occurred in other fields, eventually resulting in theories called poststructuralist. This article explores the process through which Eisenman met such an impasse in his early work and began a more self-consciously deconstruction mode of working. I also consider how Eisenman’s more recent work participates in an ongoing critique within cultural theory in general of institutions and power. Finally, I suggest that we reconsider just what deconstruction and post-modernism mean in architecture.

AB - This article examines the events that led architect Peter Eisenman to abandon his earlier mode of working, exemplified by his houses of the sixties through the seventies, and to begin his “deconstruction” projects, such as the Wexner Center in Columbus, Ohio. Eisenman's early concerns centered on late-modernist understandings of form, structure, autonomy, self-sufficiency, and strict self-referentiality. Through his writings, Eisenman situated his work within related theoretical issues that were circulating in the fields of linguistics, painting, and sculpture, using them as examples, analogies, and theoretical support. These other related disciplines reached a limit in the quest for autonomy and self-sufficiency due to the limit immanent in the logic and rhetoric employed to achieve their goals. The same deconstruction occurred in other fields, eventually resulting in theories called poststructuralist. This article explores the process through which Eisenman met such an impasse in his early work and began a more self-consciously deconstruction mode of working. I also consider how Eisenman’s more recent work participates in an ongoing critique within cultural theory in general of institutions and power. Finally, I suggest that we reconsider just what deconstruction and post-modernism mean in architecture.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898272158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898272158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10464883.1993.10734581

DO - 10.1080/10464883.1993.10734581

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84898272158

VL - 47

SP - 88

EP - 100

JO - Journal of Architectural Education

JF - Journal of Architectural Education

SN - 1046-4883

IS - 2

ER -