Formulaic sequences and EAP writing development

Lexical bundles in the TOEFL iBT writing section

Shelley Staples, Jesse Egbert, Douglas E Biber, Alyson McClair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Formulaic sequences are widely used in academic writing and are known to be an important aspect of EAP writing development. However, little research has investigated the frequency, function and degree of fixedness of their use by ESL writers across proficiency levels. This study examines the use of lexical bundles in written responses across three proficiency levels in the TOEFL iBT (. N=480). Bundles that were identical to those found in the prompts were analyzed separately. Biber, Conrad, and Cortes' (2004) taxonomy was used to identify bundle functions. Following Biber (2009), the degree of fixedness for each of the four slots in the bundle was investigated in relation to the other three. The results indicate that lower level learners used more bundles overall but also more bundles identical to those in the prompts. In contrast, the functional analysis reveals a similar use of stance and discourse organizing bundles across proficiency levels and very few referential bundles used by any of the groups. In addition, there were few differences in fixed versus variable slot bundles across proficiency levels. These findings have important implications for instruction and assessment of EAP writing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)214-225
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of English for Academic Purposes
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

functional analysis
taxonomy
writer
instruction
discourse
Formulaic Sequences
Lexical Bundles
TOEFL
Bundle
Writing Development
Group
Proficiency
Prompts

Keywords

  • Academic writing development
  • Corpus linguistics
  • EAP
  • Learner writing
  • Lexical bundles
  • TOEFL iBT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Formulaic sequences and EAP writing development : Lexical bundles in the TOEFL iBT writing section. / Staples, Shelley; Egbert, Jesse; Biber, Douglas E; McClair, Alyson.

In: Journal of English for Academic Purposes, Vol. 12, No. 3, 09.2013, p. 214-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{67b77859a53b45f0bf28c3f79c062864,
title = "Formulaic sequences and EAP writing development: Lexical bundles in the TOEFL iBT writing section",
abstract = "Formulaic sequences are widely used in academic writing and are known to be an important aspect of EAP writing development. However, little research has investigated the frequency, function and degree of fixedness of their use by ESL writers across proficiency levels. This study examines the use of lexical bundles in written responses across three proficiency levels in the TOEFL iBT (. N=480). Bundles that were identical to those found in the prompts were analyzed separately. Biber, Conrad, and Cortes' (2004) taxonomy was used to identify bundle functions. Following Biber (2009), the degree of fixedness for each of the four slots in the bundle was investigated in relation to the other three. The results indicate that lower level learners used more bundles overall but also more bundles identical to those in the prompts. In contrast, the functional analysis reveals a similar use of stance and discourse organizing bundles across proficiency levels and very few referential bundles used by any of the groups. In addition, there were few differences in fixed versus variable slot bundles across proficiency levels. These findings have important implications for instruction and assessment of EAP writing.",
keywords = "Academic writing development, Corpus linguistics, EAP, Learner writing, Lexical bundles, TOEFL iBT",
author = "Shelley Staples and Jesse Egbert and Biber, {Douglas E} and Alyson McClair",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jeap.2013.05.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "214--225",
journal = "Journal of English for Academic Purposes",
issn = "1475-1585",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Formulaic sequences and EAP writing development

T2 - Lexical bundles in the TOEFL iBT writing section

AU - Staples, Shelley

AU - Egbert, Jesse

AU - Biber, Douglas E

AU - McClair, Alyson

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Formulaic sequences are widely used in academic writing and are known to be an important aspect of EAP writing development. However, little research has investigated the frequency, function and degree of fixedness of their use by ESL writers across proficiency levels. This study examines the use of lexical bundles in written responses across three proficiency levels in the TOEFL iBT (. N=480). Bundles that were identical to those found in the prompts were analyzed separately. Biber, Conrad, and Cortes' (2004) taxonomy was used to identify bundle functions. Following Biber (2009), the degree of fixedness for each of the four slots in the bundle was investigated in relation to the other three. The results indicate that lower level learners used more bundles overall but also more bundles identical to those in the prompts. In contrast, the functional analysis reveals a similar use of stance and discourse organizing bundles across proficiency levels and very few referential bundles used by any of the groups. In addition, there were few differences in fixed versus variable slot bundles across proficiency levels. These findings have important implications for instruction and assessment of EAP writing.

AB - Formulaic sequences are widely used in academic writing and are known to be an important aspect of EAP writing development. However, little research has investigated the frequency, function and degree of fixedness of their use by ESL writers across proficiency levels. This study examines the use of lexical bundles in written responses across three proficiency levels in the TOEFL iBT (. N=480). Bundles that were identical to those found in the prompts were analyzed separately. Biber, Conrad, and Cortes' (2004) taxonomy was used to identify bundle functions. Following Biber (2009), the degree of fixedness for each of the four slots in the bundle was investigated in relation to the other three. The results indicate that lower level learners used more bundles overall but also more bundles identical to those in the prompts. In contrast, the functional analysis reveals a similar use of stance and discourse organizing bundles across proficiency levels and very few referential bundles used by any of the groups. In addition, there were few differences in fixed versus variable slot bundles across proficiency levels. These findings have important implications for instruction and assessment of EAP writing.

KW - Academic writing development

KW - Corpus linguistics

KW - EAP

KW - Learner writing

KW - Lexical bundles

KW - TOEFL iBT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883322119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883322119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.05.002

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 214

EP - 225

JO - Journal of English for Academic Purposes

JF - Journal of English for Academic Purposes

SN - 1475-1585

IS - 3

ER -