Forests, fuelwood and livelihoods-energy transition patterns in eastern Indonesia

Soo Min Lee, Yeon-Su Kim, Wanggi Jaung, Sitti Latifah, Mansur Afifi, Larry A. Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The central thesis of the energy ladder model is a unidirectional transition from primitive to advance fuel with increased affluence of households. Although now largely discredited, this assumption remains a foundation of laissez-faire policies that anticipate energy transition resulting spontaneous forest recovery with economic development. Our results suggest that such policies can undermine broader policy objectives and actually worsen forest conditions in rural Indonesia. Based on a case study of forest margin communities in eastern Indonesia, we demonstrate that fuel subsidy reform did little to reduce rural household demand for fuelwood, while dramatically increasing fuelwood demand for processing agricultural products. Our results show how household decisions related to fuel sources are affected by non-economic considerations and external factors, such as opportunities to sell fuelwood. We argue that policy interventions that encourage energy transition of households do not necessarily improve forest conditions, as household fuelwood use may be a symptom, rather than a driver of deforestation and forest degradation. Thus policies to improve forest conditions should focus more on addressing the market environment of forest-margin communities, providing energy alternatives to small industries that are often the larger consumers of fuelwood.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-70
Number of pages10
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume85
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

fuelwood
Deforestation
energy
Agricultural products
Ladders
Recovery
Degradation
Economics
Processing
alternative energy
livelihood
Industry
deforestation
economic development
household
policy
industry

Keywords

  • Energy stacking
  • Energy transition
  • Forest management
  • Fuelwood
  • Indonesia
  • Tobacco curing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy(all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Forests, fuelwood and livelihoods-energy transition patterns in eastern Indonesia. / Lee, Soo Min; Kim, Yeon-Su; Jaung, Wanggi; Latifah, Sitti; Afifi, Mansur; Fisher, Larry A.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 85, 01.10.2015, p. 61-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Soo Min ; Kim, Yeon-Su ; Jaung, Wanggi ; Latifah, Sitti ; Afifi, Mansur ; Fisher, Larry A. / Forests, fuelwood and livelihoods-energy transition patterns in eastern Indonesia. In: Energy Policy. 2015 ; Vol. 85. pp. 61-70.
@article{cf8ef43a41d94a63985eede34d37ab4d,
title = "Forests, fuelwood and livelihoods-energy transition patterns in eastern Indonesia",
abstract = "The central thesis of the energy ladder model is a unidirectional transition from primitive to advance fuel with increased affluence of households. Although now largely discredited, this assumption remains a foundation of laissez-faire policies that anticipate energy transition resulting spontaneous forest recovery with economic development. Our results suggest that such policies can undermine broader policy objectives and actually worsen forest conditions in rural Indonesia. Based on a case study of forest margin communities in eastern Indonesia, we demonstrate that fuel subsidy reform did little to reduce rural household demand for fuelwood, while dramatically increasing fuelwood demand for processing agricultural products. Our results show how household decisions related to fuel sources are affected by non-economic considerations and external factors, such as opportunities to sell fuelwood. We argue that policy interventions that encourage energy transition of households do not necessarily improve forest conditions, as household fuelwood use may be a symptom, rather than a driver of deforestation and forest degradation. Thus policies to improve forest conditions should focus more on addressing the market environment of forest-margin communities, providing energy alternatives to small industries that are often the larger consumers of fuelwood.",
keywords = "Energy stacking, Energy transition, Forest management, Fuelwood, Indonesia, Tobacco curing",
author = "Lee, {Soo Min} and Yeon-Su Kim and Wanggi Jaung and Sitti Latifah and Mansur Afifi and Fisher, {Larry A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.030",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "61--70",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forests, fuelwood and livelihoods-energy transition patterns in eastern Indonesia

AU - Lee, Soo Min

AU - Kim, Yeon-Su

AU - Jaung, Wanggi

AU - Latifah, Sitti

AU - Afifi, Mansur

AU - Fisher, Larry A.

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - The central thesis of the energy ladder model is a unidirectional transition from primitive to advance fuel with increased affluence of households. Although now largely discredited, this assumption remains a foundation of laissez-faire policies that anticipate energy transition resulting spontaneous forest recovery with economic development. Our results suggest that such policies can undermine broader policy objectives and actually worsen forest conditions in rural Indonesia. Based on a case study of forest margin communities in eastern Indonesia, we demonstrate that fuel subsidy reform did little to reduce rural household demand for fuelwood, while dramatically increasing fuelwood demand for processing agricultural products. Our results show how household decisions related to fuel sources are affected by non-economic considerations and external factors, such as opportunities to sell fuelwood. We argue that policy interventions that encourage energy transition of households do not necessarily improve forest conditions, as household fuelwood use may be a symptom, rather than a driver of deforestation and forest degradation. Thus policies to improve forest conditions should focus more on addressing the market environment of forest-margin communities, providing energy alternatives to small industries that are often the larger consumers of fuelwood.

AB - The central thesis of the energy ladder model is a unidirectional transition from primitive to advance fuel with increased affluence of households. Although now largely discredited, this assumption remains a foundation of laissez-faire policies that anticipate energy transition resulting spontaneous forest recovery with economic development. Our results suggest that such policies can undermine broader policy objectives and actually worsen forest conditions in rural Indonesia. Based on a case study of forest margin communities in eastern Indonesia, we demonstrate that fuel subsidy reform did little to reduce rural household demand for fuelwood, while dramatically increasing fuelwood demand for processing agricultural products. Our results show how household decisions related to fuel sources are affected by non-economic considerations and external factors, such as opportunities to sell fuelwood. We argue that policy interventions that encourage energy transition of households do not necessarily improve forest conditions, as household fuelwood use may be a symptom, rather than a driver of deforestation and forest degradation. Thus policies to improve forest conditions should focus more on addressing the market environment of forest-margin communities, providing energy alternatives to small industries that are often the larger consumers of fuelwood.

KW - Energy stacking

KW - Energy transition

KW - Forest management

KW - Fuelwood

KW - Indonesia

KW - Tobacco curing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940022285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940022285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.030

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.030

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84940022285

VL - 85

SP - 61

EP - 70

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

ER -