Forest structure and prey abundance in winter habitat of northern goshawks

Joseph E. Drennan, Paul Beier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The U.S. Forest Service manages most southwestern ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) for forest structures designed to increase abundance of prey for northern goshawks (Accipiter gentilis). The rationale for this strategy is a hypothesis that goshawk populations are limited by prey abundance. However, Beier and Drennan (1997) found that during the breeding season goshawks selected foraging sites not for higher prey abundance but for higher canopy closure, greater tree density, and greater density, of trees >40.6 cm diameter at breast height (dbh). This finding supports the argument that prey availability (as determined by forest structure suited to goshawk maneuverability and hunting behavior) is more important than prey abundance. During winter, goshawks are under greater thermal stress, most avian prey have migrated, and most mammalian prey are hibernating. Under these conditions, foraging habitats may differ from those described for the breeding season. We radiotracked 13 adult goshawks (6 F, 7 M) during 2 winters (1994-1995 and 1995-1996) to investigate seasonal movements, winter diet, and selection of foraging habitat. Most females continued to use their breeding-season home ranges in ponderosa pine forest during winter. Meanwhile, most males moved into lower-elevation pinyon-juniper forest. In contrast to the high prey diversity noted during breeding season, wintering goshawks specialized on only 2 species of large-bodied prey (cottontails [Sylvilagus spp.] and Abert squirrel [Sciurus aberti]). Goshawks minimized energy, expense and thermal exposure of flight by caching and feeding behavior. Sites where goshawks foraged had more medium-sized trees (P = 0.06) and denser canopy closure (P = 0.06) than nearby reference plots that lacked evidence of goshawk use. However, indices of prey abundance were nearly equal at used and reference plots. Although our findings do not support the underlying premise of the Forest Service management strategy for goshawks, we have no evidence that goshawks will experience lower survival or fecundity under such management. Regardless of the impact of management on goshawk fitness, we question the policy of managing most ponderosa pine habitat in the Southwest United States based on the needs of this species alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)177-185
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Wildlife Management
Volume67
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2003

Fingerprint

Accipiter gentilis
Pinus ponderosa
breeding season
Sylvilagus
winter
foraging
habitat
habitats
pinyon-juniper
canopy
maneuverability
Sciurus
USDA Forest Service
thermal stress
squirrels
migratory behavior
tree and stand measurements
feeding behavior
coniferous forests
caching

Keywords

  • Accipiter gentilis
  • Arizona
  • Diet
  • Foraging
  • Forest structure
  • Habitat selection
  • Northern goshawk
  • Prey
  • Raptors
  • Winter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology

Cite this

Forest structure and prey abundance in winter habitat of northern goshawks. / Drennan, Joseph E.; Beier, Paul.

In: Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 67, No. 1, 01.2003, p. 177-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d2b7dc91b1684679a820c63e28e5e60b,
title = "Forest structure and prey abundance in winter habitat of northern goshawks",
abstract = "The U.S. Forest Service manages most southwestern ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) for forest structures designed to increase abundance of prey for northern goshawks (Accipiter gentilis). The rationale for this strategy is a hypothesis that goshawk populations are limited by prey abundance. However, Beier and Drennan (1997) found that during the breeding season goshawks selected foraging sites not for higher prey abundance but for higher canopy closure, greater tree density, and greater density, of trees >40.6 cm diameter at breast height (dbh). This finding supports the argument that prey availability (as determined by forest structure suited to goshawk maneuverability and hunting behavior) is more important than prey abundance. During winter, goshawks are under greater thermal stress, most avian prey have migrated, and most mammalian prey are hibernating. Under these conditions, foraging habitats may differ from those described for the breeding season. We radiotracked 13 adult goshawks (6 F, 7 M) during 2 winters (1994-1995 and 1995-1996) to investigate seasonal movements, winter diet, and selection of foraging habitat. Most females continued to use their breeding-season home ranges in ponderosa pine forest during winter. Meanwhile, most males moved into lower-elevation pinyon-juniper forest. In contrast to the high prey diversity noted during breeding season, wintering goshawks specialized on only 2 species of large-bodied prey (cottontails [Sylvilagus spp.] and Abert squirrel [Sciurus aberti]). Goshawks minimized energy, expense and thermal exposure of flight by caching and feeding behavior. Sites where goshawks foraged had more medium-sized trees (P = 0.06) and denser canopy closure (P = 0.06) than nearby reference plots that lacked evidence of goshawk use. However, indices of prey abundance were nearly equal at used and reference plots. Although our findings do not support the underlying premise of the Forest Service management strategy for goshawks, we have no evidence that goshawks will experience lower survival or fecundity under such management. Regardless of the impact of management on goshawk fitness, we question the policy of managing most ponderosa pine habitat in the Southwest United States based on the needs of this species alone.",
keywords = "Accipiter gentilis, Arizona, Diet, Foraging, Forest structure, Habitat selection, Northern goshawk, Prey, Raptors, Winter",
author = "Drennan, {Joseph E.} and Paul Beier",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "177--185",
journal = "Journal of Wildlife Management",
issn = "0022-541X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forest structure and prey abundance in winter habitat of northern goshawks

AU - Drennan, Joseph E.

AU - Beier, Paul

PY - 2003/1

Y1 - 2003/1

N2 - The U.S. Forest Service manages most southwestern ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) for forest structures designed to increase abundance of prey for northern goshawks (Accipiter gentilis). The rationale for this strategy is a hypothesis that goshawk populations are limited by prey abundance. However, Beier and Drennan (1997) found that during the breeding season goshawks selected foraging sites not for higher prey abundance but for higher canopy closure, greater tree density, and greater density, of trees >40.6 cm diameter at breast height (dbh). This finding supports the argument that prey availability (as determined by forest structure suited to goshawk maneuverability and hunting behavior) is more important than prey abundance. During winter, goshawks are under greater thermal stress, most avian prey have migrated, and most mammalian prey are hibernating. Under these conditions, foraging habitats may differ from those described for the breeding season. We radiotracked 13 adult goshawks (6 F, 7 M) during 2 winters (1994-1995 and 1995-1996) to investigate seasonal movements, winter diet, and selection of foraging habitat. Most females continued to use their breeding-season home ranges in ponderosa pine forest during winter. Meanwhile, most males moved into lower-elevation pinyon-juniper forest. In contrast to the high prey diversity noted during breeding season, wintering goshawks specialized on only 2 species of large-bodied prey (cottontails [Sylvilagus spp.] and Abert squirrel [Sciurus aberti]). Goshawks minimized energy, expense and thermal exposure of flight by caching and feeding behavior. Sites where goshawks foraged had more medium-sized trees (P = 0.06) and denser canopy closure (P = 0.06) than nearby reference plots that lacked evidence of goshawk use. However, indices of prey abundance were nearly equal at used and reference plots. Although our findings do not support the underlying premise of the Forest Service management strategy for goshawks, we have no evidence that goshawks will experience lower survival or fecundity under such management. Regardless of the impact of management on goshawk fitness, we question the policy of managing most ponderosa pine habitat in the Southwest United States based on the needs of this species alone.

AB - The U.S. Forest Service manages most southwestern ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) for forest structures designed to increase abundance of prey for northern goshawks (Accipiter gentilis). The rationale for this strategy is a hypothesis that goshawk populations are limited by prey abundance. However, Beier and Drennan (1997) found that during the breeding season goshawks selected foraging sites not for higher prey abundance but for higher canopy closure, greater tree density, and greater density, of trees >40.6 cm diameter at breast height (dbh). This finding supports the argument that prey availability (as determined by forest structure suited to goshawk maneuverability and hunting behavior) is more important than prey abundance. During winter, goshawks are under greater thermal stress, most avian prey have migrated, and most mammalian prey are hibernating. Under these conditions, foraging habitats may differ from those described for the breeding season. We radiotracked 13 adult goshawks (6 F, 7 M) during 2 winters (1994-1995 and 1995-1996) to investigate seasonal movements, winter diet, and selection of foraging habitat. Most females continued to use their breeding-season home ranges in ponderosa pine forest during winter. Meanwhile, most males moved into lower-elevation pinyon-juniper forest. In contrast to the high prey diversity noted during breeding season, wintering goshawks specialized on only 2 species of large-bodied prey (cottontails [Sylvilagus spp.] and Abert squirrel [Sciurus aberti]). Goshawks minimized energy, expense and thermal exposure of flight by caching and feeding behavior. Sites where goshawks foraged had more medium-sized trees (P = 0.06) and denser canopy closure (P = 0.06) than nearby reference plots that lacked evidence of goshawk use. However, indices of prey abundance were nearly equal at used and reference plots. Although our findings do not support the underlying premise of the Forest Service management strategy for goshawks, we have no evidence that goshawks will experience lower survival or fecundity under such management. Regardless of the impact of management on goshawk fitness, we question the policy of managing most ponderosa pine habitat in the Southwest United States based on the needs of this species alone.

KW - Accipiter gentilis

KW - Arizona

KW - Diet

KW - Foraging

KW - Forest structure

KW - Habitat selection

KW - Northern goshawk

KW - Prey

KW - Raptors

KW - Winter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037287892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037287892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 177

EP - 185

JO - Journal of Wildlife Management

JF - Journal of Wildlife Management

SN - 0022-541X

IS - 1

ER -