Fire histories in ponderosa pine forests of Grand Canyon are well supported

Reply to Baker

Peter Z Fule, Thomas A. Heinlein, Wallace W Covington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fire scars and other paleoecological methods are imperfect proxies for detecting past patterns of fire events. However, calculations of long fire rotations in Grand Canyon ponderosa pine forests by Baker are not convincing in methodology or assumptions compared with fire-scar evidence of frequent surface fires. Patches of severe disturbance are a possible hypothesis to explain the relatively short age structure at the park, where ∼12% fewer trees were older than 300 years compared with another unharvested northern Arizona site. However, mapped patterns of old trees as well as the evidence for frequent surface fire from fire scars, charcoal deposition studies, and evolutionary history are more consistent with the dominance of surface fire prior to c. 1880. The most relevant available evidence of fire recurrence at a given point, mean point fire intervals, had median values <16 years at all five study sites, close to filtered composite fire interval statistics (∼6?10 years), but much lower than Baker's calculated fire rotation values (55?110 years). The composite fire interval is not a uniquely important statistic or a numerical guideline for management, but one of many lines of evidence underscoring the ecological role of frequent surface fire in ponderosa pine forests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)439-445
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Wildland Fire
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

fire history
Pinus ponderosa
canyons
canyon
coniferous forests
history
fire scars
statistics
charcoal
age structure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Fire histories in ponderosa pine forests of Grand Canyon are well supported : Reply to Baker. / Fule, Peter Z; Heinlein, Thomas A.; Covington, Wallace W.

In: International Journal of Wildland Fire, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2006, p. 439-445.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{709f78e75c8a4e51b0aeb82023dc8fbd,
title = "Fire histories in ponderosa pine forests of Grand Canyon are well supported: Reply to Baker",
abstract = "Fire scars and other paleoecological methods are imperfect proxies for detecting past patterns of fire events. However, calculations of long fire rotations in Grand Canyon ponderosa pine forests by Baker are not convincing in methodology or assumptions compared with fire-scar evidence of frequent surface fires. Patches of severe disturbance are a possible hypothesis to explain the relatively short age structure at the park, where ∼12{\%} fewer trees were older than 300 years compared with another unharvested northern Arizona site. However, mapped patterns of old trees as well as the evidence for frequent surface fire from fire scars, charcoal deposition studies, and evolutionary history are more consistent with the dominance of surface fire prior to c. 1880. The most relevant available evidence of fire recurrence at a given point, mean point fire intervals, had median values <16 years at all five study sites, close to filtered composite fire interval statistics (∼6?10 years), but much lower than Baker's calculated fire rotation values (55?110 years). The composite fire interval is not a uniquely important statistic or a numerical guideline for management, but one of many lines of evidence underscoring the ecological role of frequent surface fire in ponderosa pine forests.",
author = "Fule, {Peter Z} and Heinlein, {Thomas A.} and Covington, {Wallace W}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1071/WF06048",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "439--445",
journal = "International Journal of Wildland Fire",
issn = "1049-8001",
publisher = "CSIRO",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fire histories in ponderosa pine forests of Grand Canyon are well supported

T2 - Reply to Baker

AU - Fule, Peter Z

AU - Heinlein, Thomas A.

AU - Covington, Wallace W

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Fire scars and other paleoecological methods are imperfect proxies for detecting past patterns of fire events. However, calculations of long fire rotations in Grand Canyon ponderosa pine forests by Baker are not convincing in methodology or assumptions compared with fire-scar evidence of frequent surface fires. Patches of severe disturbance are a possible hypothesis to explain the relatively short age structure at the park, where ∼12% fewer trees were older than 300 years compared with another unharvested northern Arizona site. However, mapped patterns of old trees as well as the evidence for frequent surface fire from fire scars, charcoal deposition studies, and evolutionary history are more consistent with the dominance of surface fire prior to c. 1880. The most relevant available evidence of fire recurrence at a given point, mean point fire intervals, had median values <16 years at all five study sites, close to filtered composite fire interval statistics (∼6?10 years), but much lower than Baker's calculated fire rotation values (55?110 years). The composite fire interval is not a uniquely important statistic or a numerical guideline for management, but one of many lines of evidence underscoring the ecological role of frequent surface fire in ponderosa pine forests.

AB - Fire scars and other paleoecological methods are imperfect proxies for detecting past patterns of fire events. However, calculations of long fire rotations in Grand Canyon ponderosa pine forests by Baker are not convincing in methodology or assumptions compared with fire-scar evidence of frequent surface fires. Patches of severe disturbance are a possible hypothesis to explain the relatively short age structure at the park, where ∼12% fewer trees were older than 300 years compared with another unharvested northern Arizona site. However, mapped patterns of old trees as well as the evidence for frequent surface fire from fire scars, charcoal deposition studies, and evolutionary history are more consistent with the dominance of surface fire prior to c. 1880. The most relevant available evidence of fire recurrence at a given point, mean point fire intervals, had median values <16 years at all five study sites, close to filtered composite fire interval statistics (∼6?10 years), but much lower than Baker's calculated fire rotation values (55?110 years). The composite fire interval is not a uniquely important statistic or a numerical guideline for management, but one of many lines of evidence underscoring the ecological role of frequent surface fire in ponderosa pine forests.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748424102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748424102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1071/WF06048

DO - 10.1071/WF06048

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 439

EP - 445

JO - International Journal of Wildland Fire

JF - International Journal of Wildland Fire

SN - 1049-8001

IS - 3

ER -