Fermat’s Dilemma

Why Did He Keep Mum on Infinitesimals? And the European Theological Context

Jacques Bair, Mikhail G. Katz, David M Sherry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The first half of the 17th century was a time of intellectual ferment when wars of natural philosophy were echoes of religious wars, as we illustrate by a case study of an apparently innocuous mathematical technique called adequality pioneered by the honorable judge Pierre de Fermat, its relation to indivisibles, as well as to other hocus-pocus. André Weil noted that simple applications of adequality involving polynomials can be treated purely algebraically but more general problems like the cycloid curve cannot be so treated and involve additional tools–leading the mathematician Fermat potentially into troubled waters. Breger attacks Tannery for tampering with Fermat’s manuscript but it is Breger who tampers with Fermat’s procedure by moving all terms to the left-hand side so as to accord better with Breger’s own interpretation emphasizing the double root idea. We provide modern proxies for Fermat’s procedures in terms of relations of infinite proximity as well as the standard part function.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-37
Number of pages37
JournalFoundations of Science
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Nov 14 2017

Fingerprint

Fermat
Water
Attack
Religion
Mathematicians
Manuscripts
Proximity
Indivisibles
Natural philosophy

Keywords

  • Adequality
  • Atomism
  • Council of Trent 13.2
  • Cycloid
  • Edict of Nantes
  • Hylomorphism
  • Indivisibles
  • Infinitesimal
  • Jesuat
  • Jesuit

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Fermat’s Dilemma : Why Did He Keep Mum on Infinitesimals? And the European Theological Context. / Bair, Jacques; Katz, Mikhail G.; Sherry, David M.

In: Foundations of Science, 14.11.2017, p. 1-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9ca91c1e5348481ba36c087a08c2e991,
title = "Fermat’s Dilemma: Why Did He Keep Mum on Infinitesimals? And the European Theological Context",
abstract = "The first half of the 17th century was a time of intellectual ferment when wars of natural philosophy were echoes of religious wars, as we illustrate by a case study of an apparently innocuous mathematical technique called adequality pioneered by the honorable judge Pierre de Fermat, its relation to indivisibles, as well as to other hocus-pocus. Andr{\'e} Weil noted that simple applications of adequality involving polynomials can be treated purely algebraically but more general problems like the cycloid curve cannot be so treated and involve additional tools–leading the mathematician Fermat potentially into troubled waters. Breger attacks Tannery for tampering with Fermat’s manuscript but it is Breger who tampers with Fermat’s procedure by moving all terms to the left-hand side so as to accord better with Breger’s own interpretation emphasizing the double root idea. We provide modern proxies for Fermat’s procedures in terms of relations of infinite proximity as well as the standard part function.",
keywords = "Adequality, Atomism, Council of Trent 13.2, Cycloid, Edict of Nantes, Hylomorphism, Indivisibles, Infinitesimal, Jesuat, Jesuit",
author = "Jacques Bair and Katz, {Mikhail G.} and Sherry, {David M}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1007/s10699-017-9542-y",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--37",
journal = "Foundations of Science",
issn = "1233-1821",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fermat’s Dilemma

T2 - Why Did He Keep Mum on Infinitesimals? And the European Theological Context

AU - Bair, Jacques

AU - Katz, Mikhail G.

AU - Sherry, David M

PY - 2017/11/14

Y1 - 2017/11/14

N2 - The first half of the 17th century was a time of intellectual ferment when wars of natural philosophy were echoes of religious wars, as we illustrate by a case study of an apparently innocuous mathematical technique called adequality pioneered by the honorable judge Pierre de Fermat, its relation to indivisibles, as well as to other hocus-pocus. André Weil noted that simple applications of adequality involving polynomials can be treated purely algebraically but more general problems like the cycloid curve cannot be so treated and involve additional tools–leading the mathematician Fermat potentially into troubled waters. Breger attacks Tannery for tampering with Fermat’s manuscript but it is Breger who tampers with Fermat’s procedure by moving all terms to the left-hand side so as to accord better with Breger’s own interpretation emphasizing the double root idea. We provide modern proxies for Fermat’s procedures in terms of relations of infinite proximity as well as the standard part function.

AB - The first half of the 17th century was a time of intellectual ferment when wars of natural philosophy were echoes of religious wars, as we illustrate by a case study of an apparently innocuous mathematical technique called adequality pioneered by the honorable judge Pierre de Fermat, its relation to indivisibles, as well as to other hocus-pocus. André Weil noted that simple applications of adequality involving polynomials can be treated purely algebraically but more general problems like the cycloid curve cannot be so treated and involve additional tools–leading the mathematician Fermat potentially into troubled waters. Breger attacks Tannery for tampering with Fermat’s manuscript but it is Breger who tampers with Fermat’s procedure by moving all terms to the left-hand side so as to accord better with Breger’s own interpretation emphasizing the double root idea. We provide modern proxies for Fermat’s procedures in terms of relations of infinite proximity as well as the standard part function.

KW - Adequality

KW - Atomism

KW - Council of Trent 13.2

KW - Cycloid

KW - Edict of Nantes

KW - Hylomorphism

KW - Indivisibles

KW - Infinitesimal

KW - Jesuat

KW - Jesuit

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033709700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033709700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10699-017-9542-y

DO - 10.1007/s10699-017-9542-y

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 37

JO - Foundations of Science

JF - Foundations of Science

SN - 1233-1821

ER -