Feasibility of injury reporting via text messaging in club sport settings: A prospective cohort study

Nicole J. Chimera, Monica R. Lininger, Bethany Hudson, Christopher Kendall, Lindsay Plucknette, Timothy Szalkowski, Meghan Warren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A novel technique of short message service (SMS), or text message, has examined injuries in elite handball and female football and community Australian football with a response rate of over 75%. The purpose of this study was to determine if text message is a feasible method of prospectively collecting injury density data in club sports teams in the United States. Participants received a weekly text message with four questions asking about pain and participation in the past week. If the participant indicated pain in the past week, a follow-up phone interview was conducted to determine the nature of the pain/injury. The overall text message response rate was 89.8%; there were 281 responses out of 313 participant contacts over the 12-week study period. Semi-structured follow-up phone interviews were completed for 37 of the 55 reports of pain that were indicated through text message response, resulting in further injury information for 65.5% of injuries. Incidence density of reporting pain over the 12-week study was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.68–1.15) per 1,000 min of activity. In this sample, text message response rates were similar to previous studies; however, we did lose nine (25.7%) participants to follow-up.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)328-333
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Athletes
  • Epidemiology
  • Injury tracking
  • SMS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Feasibility of injury reporting via text messaging in club sport settings: A prospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this