Exploring the double jeopardy effect

The importance of gender and race in work-family research

Tonya K. Frevert, Satoris S. Culbertson, Ann H Huffman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The demographics of the American workforce shifted considerably throughout the last several decades, most notably reflected in the increasing number of women employed outside the home. Researchers from a wide range of disciplines thus examined issues related to women’s involvement in the workplace, including their work-family conflict. One emergent criticism of work-family research, however, is that extant research tends to emphasize work-family experiences of professional white women, while women of color are largely overlooked. Whereby some suggest that all women remain disadvantaged in the workplace (Hakim, 2004), women of color are often in “double jeopardy” for belonging to two disadvantaged status categories of gender and race (King, 1988). Thus it is reasonable to suspect that the work-family experiences of women of color are substantially different from professional white women. The goal of our chapter is to provide a comprehensive overview of work-family experiences of women of color. We first discuss embracing a multiple identities’ approach (i.e., the intersection of gender and race). We then review the role of gender and the role of race/ethnicity in work-family research. Using national labor force data, we then compare descriptive variables of white women to women of color to identify how their needs and resources differ. Finally, we discuss methodological considerations and research suggestions to guide future scholars’ work within the work-family area.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationGender and the Work-Family Experience: An Intersection of Two Domains
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages57-75
Number of pages19
ISBN (Print)9783319088914, 9783319088907
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

family research
gender
family work
Color
Vulnerable Populations
Workplace
workplace
experience
Research
labor force
criticism
ethnicity

Keywords

  • Double Jeopardy
  • Gender
  • Intersectionality
  • Multiple Identities
  • Race/Ethnicity
  • Work Family

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Frevert, T. K., Culbertson, S. S., & Huffman, A. H. (2015). Exploring the double jeopardy effect: The importance of gender and race in work-family research. In Gender and the Work-Family Experience: An Intersection of Two Domains (pp. 57-75). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08891-4_4

Exploring the double jeopardy effect : The importance of gender and race in work-family research. / Frevert, Tonya K.; Culbertson, Satoris S.; Huffman, Ann H.

Gender and the Work-Family Experience: An Intersection of Two Domains. Springer International Publishing, 2015. p. 57-75.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Frevert, TK, Culbertson, SS & Huffman, AH 2015, Exploring the double jeopardy effect: The importance of gender and race in work-family research. in Gender and the Work-Family Experience: An Intersection of Two Domains. Springer International Publishing, pp. 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08891-4_4
Frevert TK, Culbertson SS, Huffman AH. Exploring the double jeopardy effect: The importance of gender and race in work-family research. In Gender and the Work-Family Experience: An Intersection of Two Domains. Springer International Publishing. 2015. p. 57-75 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08891-4_4
Frevert, Tonya K. ; Culbertson, Satoris S. ; Huffman, Ann H. / Exploring the double jeopardy effect : The importance of gender and race in work-family research. Gender and the Work-Family Experience: An Intersection of Two Domains. Springer International Publishing, 2015. pp. 57-75
@inbook{e4a5b3663d71453a92d9569259f440d8,
title = "Exploring the double jeopardy effect: The importance of gender and race in work-family research",
abstract = "The demographics of the American workforce shifted considerably throughout the last several decades, most notably reflected in the increasing number of women employed outside the home. Researchers from a wide range of disciplines thus examined issues related to women’s involvement in the workplace, including their work-family conflict. One emergent criticism of work-family research, however, is that extant research tends to emphasize work-family experiences of professional white women, while women of color are largely overlooked. Whereby some suggest that all women remain disadvantaged in the workplace (Hakim, 2004), women of color are often in “double jeopardy” for belonging to two disadvantaged status categories of gender and race (King, 1988). Thus it is reasonable to suspect that the work-family experiences of women of color are substantially different from professional white women. The goal of our chapter is to provide a comprehensive overview of work-family experiences of women of color. We first discuss embracing a multiple identities’ approach (i.e., the intersection of gender and race). We then review the role of gender and the role of race/ethnicity in work-family research. Using national labor force data, we then compare descriptive variables of white women to women of color to identify how their needs and resources differ. Finally, we discuss methodological considerations and research suggestions to guide future scholars{\^a}€™ work within the work-family area.",
keywords = "Double Jeopardy, Gender, Intersectionality, Multiple Identities, Race/Ethnicity, Work Family",
author = "Frevert, {Tonya K.} and Culbertson, {Satoris S.} and Huffman, {Ann H}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-08891-4_4",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783319088914",
pages = "57--75",
booktitle = "Gender and the Work-Family Experience: An Intersection of Two Domains",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Exploring the double jeopardy effect

T2 - The importance of gender and race in work-family research

AU - Frevert, Tonya K.

AU - Culbertson, Satoris S.

AU - Huffman, Ann H

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The demographics of the American workforce shifted considerably throughout the last several decades, most notably reflected in the increasing number of women employed outside the home. Researchers from a wide range of disciplines thus examined issues related to women’s involvement in the workplace, including their work-family conflict. One emergent criticism of work-family research, however, is that extant research tends to emphasize work-family experiences of professional white women, while women of color are largely overlooked. Whereby some suggest that all women remain disadvantaged in the workplace (Hakim, 2004), women of color are often in “double jeopardy” for belonging to two disadvantaged status categories of gender and race (King, 1988). Thus it is reasonable to suspect that the work-family experiences of women of color are substantially different from professional white women. The goal of our chapter is to provide a comprehensive overview of work-family experiences of women of color. We first discuss embracing a multiple identities’ approach (i.e., the intersection of gender and race). We then review the role of gender and the role of race/ethnicity in work-family research. Using national labor force data, we then compare descriptive variables of white women to women of color to identify how their needs and resources differ. Finally, we discuss methodological considerations and research suggestions to guide future scholars’ work within the work-family area.

AB - The demographics of the American workforce shifted considerably throughout the last several decades, most notably reflected in the increasing number of women employed outside the home. Researchers from a wide range of disciplines thus examined issues related to women’s involvement in the workplace, including their work-family conflict. One emergent criticism of work-family research, however, is that extant research tends to emphasize work-family experiences of professional white women, while women of color are largely overlooked. Whereby some suggest that all women remain disadvantaged in the workplace (Hakim, 2004), women of color are often in “double jeopardy” for belonging to two disadvantaged status categories of gender and race (King, 1988). Thus it is reasonable to suspect that the work-family experiences of women of color are substantially different from professional white women. The goal of our chapter is to provide a comprehensive overview of work-family experiences of women of color. We first discuss embracing a multiple identities’ approach (i.e., the intersection of gender and race). We then review the role of gender and the role of race/ethnicity in work-family research. Using national labor force data, we then compare descriptive variables of white women to women of color to identify how their needs and resources differ. Finally, we discuss methodological considerations and research suggestions to guide future scholars’ work within the work-family area.

KW - Double Jeopardy

KW - Gender

KW - Intersectionality

KW - Multiple Identities

KW - Race/Ethnicity

KW - Work Family

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944631895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944631895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-08891-4_4

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-08891-4_4

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319088914

SN - 9783319088907

SP - 57

EP - 75

BT - Gender and the Work-Family Experience: An Intersection of Two Domains

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -