Expertise in Investment Analysis: Fact or Fiction

James A. Sundali, Allen B Atkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Past research, both theoretical and applied, has discounted the ability of individuals to accurately forecast security prices. Fama′s (1970, 1976) theoretical work on capital market efficiency, and the empirical studies of Stael von Holstein (1972) and Yates, McDaniel, and Brown (1991), suggests that even "experts" cannot perform any better than simple mechanical forecasting methods or the random throw of darts at the stock page. We provide evidence, garnered from a popular Wall Street Journal column, that security market "experts" do in fact outperform both market averages and randomly thrown darts. However, no class of expert can be shown to consistently outperform other experts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)223-241
Number of pages19
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Economics
Research
Expertise
Investment analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Expertise in Investment Analysis : Fact or Fiction. / Sundali, James A.; Atkins, Allen B.

In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 59, No. 2, 08.1994, p. 223-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d265c1b776bd4421a12ef9bc79e5458b,
title = "Expertise in Investment Analysis: Fact or Fiction",
abstract = "Past research, both theoretical and applied, has discounted the ability of individuals to accurately forecast security prices. Fama′s (1970, 1976) theoretical work on capital market efficiency, and the empirical studies of Stael von Holstein (1972) and Yates, McDaniel, and Brown (1991), suggests that even {"}experts{"} cannot perform any better than simple mechanical forecasting methods or the random throw of darts at the stock page. We provide evidence, garnered from a popular Wall Street Journal column, that security market {"}experts{"} do in fact outperform both market averages and randomly thrown darts. However, no class of expert can be shown to consistently outperform other experts.",
author = "Sundali, {James A.} and Atkins, {Allen B}",
year = "1994",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1006/obhd.1994.1058",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "223--241",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expertise in Investment Analysis

T2 - Fact or Fiction

AU - Sundali, James A.

AU - Atkins, Allen B

PY - 1994/8

Y1 - 1994/8

N2 - Past research, both theoretical and applied, has discounted the ability of individuals to accurately forecast security prices. Fama′s (1970, 1976) theoretical work on capital market efficiency, and the empirical studies of Stael von Holstein (1972) and Yates, McDaniel, and Brown (1991), suggests that even "experts" cannot perform any better than simple mechanical forecasting methods or the random throw of darts at the stock page. We provide evidence, garnered from a popular Wall Street Journal column, that security market "experts" do in fact outperform both market averages and randomly thrown darts. However, no class of expert can be shown to consistently outperform other experts.

AB - Past research, both theoretical and applied, has discounted the ability of individuals to accurately forecast security prices. Fama′s (1970, 1976) theoretical work on capital market efficiency, and the empirical studies of Stael von Holstein (1972) and Yates, McDaniel, and Brown (1991), suggests that even "experts" cannot perform any better than simple mechanical forecasting methods or the random throw of darts at the stock page. We provide evidence, garnered from a popular Wall Street Journal column, that security market "experts" do in fact outperform both market averages and randomly thrown darts. However, no class of expert can be shown to consistently outperform other experts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041776531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041776531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/obhd.1994.1058

DO - 10.1006/obhd.1994.1058

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0041776531

VL - 59

SP - 223

EP - 241

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 2

ER -