Examining Forest Structure With Terrestrial Lidar: Suggestions and Novel Techniques Based on Comparisons Between Scanners and Forest Treatments

Jonathon J. Donager, Temuulen Ts Sankey, Joel B. Sankey, Andrew J Sanchez Meador, Abraham E Springer, John D. Bailey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Terrestrial laser scanners (TLSs) provide a tool to assess and monitor forest structure across forest landscapes. We present TLS methods, suggestions, and mapped guidelines for planning TLS acquisitions at varying scales and forest densities. We examined rates of point-density decline with distance from two TLS that acquire data at relatively high and low point density and found that the rates were nearly identical between scanners (p value <0.01), suggesting that our findings are applicable to a range of TLS types. Using unique, TLS-adapted processing methods, we determined the relative accuracy of TLS-derived plot-scale estimates of tree height, diameter-at-breast-height, height-to-canopy, tree counts, as well as treatment-scale tree density and patch metrics, using both high point density and low point density TLS among thinned and nonthinned forest treatments. The high-density TLS consistently provides more accurate estimates of plot-level metrics (R2 = 0.46 to 0.87) than the low-density TLS (R2 = −0.14 to 0.53). At treatment scales, tree density estimates are similar among scanners (R2 = 0.95 vs. 0.71), as are canopy cover and patch metrics. We develop and present the normalized density-distance index (NDDI), which can account for up to 59% of the variance in estimate error and can be used to guide TLS-data acquisition plans. This index indicates whether a given location has generally higher point density (higher NDDI) relative to the distance from the scanner and can be used as a proxy for uncertainty. Using NDDI as a guide for fair comparison between scanners, both plot- and treatment-scale estimates improved.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEarth and Space Science
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

scanner
lidar
laser
comparison
canopy
data acquisition

Keywords

  • 3-D models
  • forest assessment
  • forest structure
  • individual tree segmentation
  • lidar
  • remote sensing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

Examining Forest Structure With Terrestrial Lidar : Suggestions and Novel Techniques Based on Comparisons Between Scanners and Forest Treatments. / Donager, Jonathon J.; Sankey, Temuulen Ts; Sankey, Joel B.; Sanchez Meador, Andrew J; Springer, Abraham E; Bailey, John D.

In: Earth and Space Science, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dd89b39b959040d2b62081ce77831790,
title = "Examining Forest Structure With Terrestrial Lidar: Suggestions and Novel Techniques Based on Comparisons Between Scanners and Forest Treatments",
abstract = "Terrestrial laser scanners (TLSs) provide a tool to assess and monitor forest structure across forest landscapes. We present TLS methods, suggestions, and mapped guidelines for planning TLS acquisitions at varying scales and forest densities. We examined rates of point-density decline with distance from two TLS that acquire data at relatively high and low point density and found that the rates were nearly identical between scanners (p value <0.01), suggesting that our findings are applicable to a range of TLS types. Using unique, TLS-adapted processing methods, we determined the relative accuracy of TLS-derived plot-scale estimates of tree height, diameter-at-breast-height, height-to-canopy, tree counts, as well as treatment-scale tree density and patch metrics, using both high point density and low point density TLS among thinned and nonthinned forest treatments. The high-density TLS consistently provides more accurate estimates of plot-level metrics (R2 = 0.46 to 0.87) than the low-density TLS (R2 = −0.14 to 0.53). At treatment scales, tree density estimates are similar among scanners (R2 = 0.95 vs. 0.71), as are canopy cover and patch metrics. We develop and present the normalized density-distance index (NDDI), which can account for up to 59{\%} of the variance in estimate error and can be used to guide TLS-data acquisition plans. This index indicates whether a given location has generally higher point density (higher NDDI) relative to the distance from the scanner and can be used as a proxy for uncertainty. Using NDDI as a guide for fair comparison between scanners, both plot- and treatment-scale estimates improved.",
keywords = "3-D models, forest assessment, forest structure, individual tree segmentation, lidar, remote sensing",
author = "Donager, {Jonathon J.} and Sankey, {Temuulen Ts} and Sankey, {Joel B.} and {Sanchez Meador}, {Andrew J} and Springer, {Abraham E} and Bailey, {John D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1029/2018EA000417",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Earth and Space Science",
issn = "2333-5084",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining Forest Structure With Terrestrial Lidar

T2 - Suggestions and Novel Techniques Based on Comparisons Between Scanners and Forest Treatments

AU - Donager, Jonathon J.

AU - Sankey, Temuulen Ts

AU - Sankey, Joel B.

AU - Sanchez Meador, Andrew J

AU - Springer, Abraham E

AU - Bailey, John D.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Terrestrial laser scanners (TLSs) provide a tool to assess and monitor forest structure across forest landscapes. We present TLS methods, suggestions, and mapped guidelines for planning TLS acquisitions at varying scales and forest densities. We examined rates of point-density decline with distance from two TLS that acquire data at relatively high and low point density and found that the rates were nearly identical between scanners (p value <0.01), suggesting that our findings are applicable to a range of TLS types. Using unique, TLS-adapted processing methods, we determined the relative accuracy of TLS-derived plot-scale estimates of tree height, diameter-at-breast-height, height-to-canopy, tree counts, as well as treatment-scale tree density and patch metrics, using both high point density and low point density TLS among thinned and nonthinned forest treatments. The high-density TLS consistently provides more accurate estimates of plot-level metrics (R2 = 0.46 to 0.87) than the low-density TLS (R2 = −0.14 to 0.53). At treatment scales, tree density estimates are similar among scanners (R2 = 0.95 vs. 0.71), as are canopy cover and patch metrics. We develop and present the normalized density-distance index (NDDI), which can account for up to 59% of the variance in estimate error and can be used to guide TLS-data acquisition plans. This index indicates whether a given location has generally higher point density (higher NDDI) relative to the distance from the scanner and can be used as a proxy for uncertainty. Using NDDI as a guide for fair comparison between scanners, both plot- and treatment-scale estimates improved.

AB - Terrestrial laser scanners (TLSs) provide a tool to assess and monitor forest structure across forest landscapes. We present TLS methods, suggestions, and mapped guidelines for planning TLS acquisitions at varying scales and forest densities. We examined rates of point-density decline with distance from two TLS that acquire data at relatively high and low point density and found that the rates were nearly identical between scanners (p value <0.01), suggesting that our findings are applicable to a range of TLS types. Using unique, TLS-adapted processing methods, we determined the relative accuracy of TLS-derived plot-scale estimates of tree height, diameter-at-breast-height, height-to-canopy, tree counts, as well as treatment-scale tree density and patch metrics, using both high point density and low point density TLS among thinned and nonthinned forest treatments. The high-density TLS consistently provides more accurate estimates of plot-level metrics (R2 = 0.46 to 0.87) than the low-density TLS (R2 = −0.14 to 0.53). At treatment scales, tree density estimates are similar among scanners (R2 = 0.95 vs. 0.71), as are canopy cover and patch metrics. We develop and present the normalized density-distance index (NDDI), which can account for up to 59% of the variance in estimate error and can be used to guide TLS-data acquisition plans. This index indicates whether a given location has generally higher point density (higher NDDI) relative to the distance from the scanner and can be used as a proxy for uncertainty. Using NDDI as a guide for fair comparison between scanners, both plot- and treatment-scale estimates improved.

KW - 3-D models

KW - forest assessment

KW - forest structure

KW - individual tree segmentation

KW - lidar

KW - remote sensing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056299807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056299807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2018EA000417

DO - 10.1029/2018EA000417

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85056299807

JO - Earth and Space Science

JF - Earth and Space Science

SN - 2333-5084

ER -