Evolution of territoriality by herbivores in response to host plant defenses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Plant defenses limit resource availability and concentrate herbivores at specific sites where they then suffer from induced plant defenses, increased predation and competition. Plant traits that enhance the negative effects of competition and increased predation must be included in the suite of plant defenses against herbivory. In an example with Pemphigus gall aphid, plant defenses result in a strong selection pressure favoring territorial behavior. The negative effects of competition give territorial individuals a 2.3-fold advantage over non-territorial individuals. Induced defenses (density dependent leaf abscission) can be just as important as competition as a selection pressure for territorial behavior. With the addition of induced plant defenses territorial individuals realize a 4.4-fold advantage. In the absence of territorial behavior, predation would probably increase by 52%. The same traits which promote territoriality also encourage cannibalism, a common herbivore behavior. -from Author

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)359-369
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Zoologist
Volume27
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1987

Fingerprint

plant defense
territoriality
host plant
herbivore
herbivores
host plants
predation
Pemphigus (Aphididae)
fold
abscission
cannibalism
gall
resource availability
leaf abscission
aphid
herbivory
galls
Aphidoidea
concentrates

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Evolution of territoriality by herbivores in response to host plant defenses. / Whitham, Thomas G.

In: American Zoologist, Vol. 27, No. 2, 1987, p. 359-369.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{11630ff8c1164d96a34d6c5880f27502,
title = "Evolution of territoriality by herbivores in response to host plant defenses",
abstract = "Plant defenses limit resource availability and concentrate herbivores at specific sites where they then suffer from induced plant defenses, increased predation and competition. Plant traits that enhance the negative effects of competition and increased predation must be included in the suite of plant defenses against herbivory. In an example with Pemphigus gall aphid, plant defenses result in a strong selection pressure favoring territorial behavior. The negative effects of competition give territorial individuals a 2.3-fold advantage over non-territorial individuals. Induced defenses (density dependent leaf abscission) can be just as important as competition as a selection pressure for territorial behavior. With the addition of induced plant defenses territorial individuals realize a 4.4-fold advantage. In the absence of territorial behavior, predation would probably increase by 52{\%}. The same traits which promote territoriality also encourage cannibalism, a common herbivore behavior. -from Author",
author = "Whitham, {Thomas G}",
year = "1987",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "359--369",
journal = "Integrative and Comparative Biology",
issn = "1540-7063",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolution of territoriality by herbivores in response to host plant defenses

AU - Whitham, Thomas G

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - Plant defenses limit resource availability and concentrate herbivores at specific sites where they then suffer from induced plant defenses, increased predation and competition. Plant traits that enhance the negative effects of competition and increased predation must be included in the suite of plant defenses against herbivory. In an example with Pemphigus gall aphid, plant defenses result in a strong selection pressure favoring territorial behavior. The negative effects of competition give territorial individuals a 2.3-fold advantage over non-territorial individuals. Induced defenses (density dependent leaf abscission) can be just as important as competition as a selection pressure for territorial behavior. With the addition of induced plant defenses territorial individuals realize a 4.4-fold advantage. In the absence of territorial behavior, predation would probably increase by 52%. The same traits which promote territoriality also encourage cannibalism, a common herbivore behavior. -from Author

AB - Plant defenses limit resource availability and concentrate herbivores at specific sites where they then suffer from induced plant defenses, increased predation and competition. Plant traits that enhance the negative effects of competition and increased predation must be included in the suite of plant defenses against herbivory. In an example with Pemphigus gall aphid, plant defenses result in a strong selection pressure favoring territorial behavior. The negative effects of competition give territorial individuals a 2.3-fold advantage over non-territorial individuals. Induced defenses (density dependent leaf abscission) can be just as important as competition as a selection pressure for territorial behavior. With the addition of induced plant defenses territorial individuals realize a 4.4-fold advantage. In the absence of territorial behavior, predation would probably increase by 52%. The same traits which promote territoriality also encourage cannibalism, a common herbivore behavior. -from Author

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023528231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023528231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0023528231

VL - 27

SP - 359

EP - 369

JO - Integrative and Comparative Biology

JF - Integrative and Comparative Biology

SN - 1540-7063

IS - 2

ER -