Evidence for two subspecies of Gunnison's prairie dogs (Cynomys gunnisoni), and the general importance of the subspecies concept

Loren C. Sackett, Amy Seglund, Robert P. Guralnick, Maxwell N. Mazzella, David M Wagner, Joseph D. Busch, Andrew P. Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Accurate taxonomy is essential for conservation, but subspecies-level systematics can be hampered both by a lack of consensus on what constitutes a subspecies and by discordance among data types (e.g., genetics vs. morphology). Here we provide a framework for evaluating subspecies using multidimensional criteria, and suggest that taxa must satisfy multiple criteria to qualify as subspecies. As a case study, we use the Gunnison's prairie dog ( Cynomys gunnisoni), a species for which there has been disagreement regarding the existence of subspecies due to inconsistent application of criteria for defining subspecies. To explicitly test the hypothesis that two subspecies exist, we generated five predictions that could be evaluated with genetic data, while also using morphological and ecological criteria. We sampled 838 Gunnison's prairie dogs from across the species range and performed a series of genetic analyses using 16 microsatellite and two mitochondrial loci (cytochrome b and the control region). We compared subspecies morphology and quantitatively evaluated whether abiotic and biotic habitat characteristics encountered by each subspecies differed. Genetic results from all five predictions supported the existence of two distinct subspecies within the confines of a proposed revision in the boundary between subspecies. The subspecies differed marginally in morphology and significantly in their habitats, suggesting ecological differentiation. Our results, which are in line with historical descriptions of morphologically distinct subspecies, suggest the subspecies should be recognized. This work provides support for the utility of integrating multiple data and analysis types to inform systematics and conservation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume174
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Cynomys
prairie
subspecies
taxonomy
prediction
habitats
cytochrome b
microsatellite repeats
case studies
loci
dog
testing
habitat

Keywords

  • Ecological differentiation
  • Evolutionary divergence
  • Genetic variation
  • Intraspecific taxonomy
  • Prairie dog
  • Subspecies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Evidence for two subspecies of Gunnison's prairie dogs (Cynomys gunnisoni), and the general importance of the subspecies concept. / Sackett, Loren C.; Seglund, Amy; Guralnick, Robert P.; Mazzella, Maxwell N.; Wagner, David M; Busch, Joseph D.; Martin, Andrew P.

In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 174, 2014, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sackett, Loren C. ; Seglund, Amy ; Guralnick, Robert P. ; Mazzella, Maxwell N. ; Wagner, David M ; Busch, Joseph D. ; Martin, Andrew P. / Evidence for two subspecies of Gunnison's prairie dogs (Cynomys gunnisoni), and the general importance of the subspecies concept. In: Biological Conservation. 2014 ; Vol. 174. pp. 1-11.
@article{ce57bf3398bf4746891fe689dbd26ed9,
title = "Evidence for two subspecies of Gunnison's prairie dogs (Cynomys gunnisoni), and the general importance of the subspecies concept",
abstract = "Accurate taxonomy is essential for conservation, but subspecies-level systematics can be hampered both by a lack of consensus on what constitutes a subspecies and by discordance among data types (e.g., genetics vs. morphology). Here we provide a framework for evaluating subspecies using multidimensional criteria, and suggest that taxa must satisfy multiple criteria to qualify as subspecies. As a case study, we use the Gunnison's prairie dog ( Cynomys gunnisoni), a species for which there has been disagreement regarding the existence of subspecies due to inconsistent application of criteria for defining subspecies. To explicitly test the hypothesis that two subspecies exist, we generated five predictions that could be evaluated with genetic data, while also using morphological and ecological criteria. We sampled 838 Gunnison's prairie dogs from across the species range and performed a series of genetic analyses using 16 microsatellite and two mitochondrial loci (cytochrome b and the control region). We compared subspecies morphology and quantitatively evaluated whether abiotic and biotic habitat characteristics encountered by each subspecies differed. Genetic results from all five predictions supported the existence of two distinct subspecies within the confines of a proposed revision in the boundary between subspecies. The subspecies differed marginally in morphology and significantly in their habitats, suggesting ecological differentiation. Our results, which are in line with historical descriptions of morphologically distinct subspecies, suggest the subspecies should be recognized. This work provides support for the utility of integrating multiple data and analysis types to inform systematics and conservation.",
keywords = "Ecological differentiation, Evolutionary divergence, Genetic variation, Intraspecific taxonomy, Prairie dog, Subspecies",
author = "Sackett, {Loren C.} and Amy Seglund and Guralnick, {Robert P.} and Mazzella, {Maxwell N.} and Wagner, {David M} and Busch, {Joseph D.} and Martin, {Andrew P.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2014.03.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "174",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence for two subspecies of Gunnison's prairie dogs (Cynomys gunnisoni), and the general importance of the subspecies concept

AU - Sackett, Loren C.

AU - Seglund, Amy

AU - Guralnick, Robert P.

AU - Mazzella, Maxwell N.

AU - Wagner, David M

AU - Busch, Joseph D.

AU - Martin, Andrew P.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Accurate taxonomy is essential for conservation, but subspecies-level systematics can be hampered both by a lack of consensus on what constitutes a subspecies and by discordance among data types (e.g., genetics vs. morphology). Here we provide a framework for evaluating subspecies using multidimensional criteria, and suggest that taxa must satisfy multiple criteria to qualify as subspecies. As a case study, we use the Gunnison's prairie dog ( Cynomys gunnisoni), a species for which there has been disagreement regarding the existence of subspecies due to inconsistent application of criteria for defining subspecies. To explicitly test the hypothesis that two subspecies exist, we generated five predictions that could be evaluated with genetic data, while also using morphological and ecological criteria. We sampled 838 Gunnison's prairie dogs from across the species range and performed a series of genetic analyses using 16 microsatellite and two mitochondrial loci (cytochrome b and the control region). We compared subspecies morphology and quantitatively evaluated whether abiotic and biotic habitat characteristics encountered by each subspecies differed. Genetic results from all five predictions supported the existence of two distinct subspecies within the confines of a proposed revision in the boundary between subspecies. The subspecies differed marginally in morphology and significantly in their habitats, suggesting ecological differentiation. Our results, which are in line with historical descriptions of morphologically distinct subspecies, suggest the subspecies should be recognized. This work provides support for the utility of integrating multiple data and analysis types to inform systematics and conservation.

AB - Accurate taxonomy is essential for conservation, but subspecies-level systematics can be hampered both by a lack of consensus on what constitutes a subspecies and by discordance among data types (e.g., genetics vs. morphology). Here we provide a framework for evaluating subspecies using multidimensional criteria, and suggest that taxa must satisfy multiple criteria to qualify as subspecies. As a case study, we use the Gunnison's prairie dog ( Cynomys gunnisoni), a species for which there has been disagreement regarding the existence of subspecies due to inconsistent application of criteria for defining subspecies. To explicitly test the hypothesis that two subspecies exist, we generated five predictions that could be evaluated with genetic data, while also using morphological and ecological criteria. We sampled 838 Gunnison's prairie dogs from across the species range and performed a series of genetic analyses using 16 microsatellite and two mitochondrial loci (cytochrome b and the control region). We compared subspecies morphology and quantitatively evaluated whether abiotic and biotic habitat characteristics encountered by each subspecies differed. Genetic results from all five predictions supported the existence of two distinct subspecies within the confines of a proposed revision in the boundary between subspecies. The subspecies differed marginally in morphology and significantly in their habitats, suggesting ecological differentiation. Our results, which are in line with historical descriptions of morphologically distinct subspecies, suggest the subspecies should be recognized. This work provides support for the utility of integrating multiple data and analysis types to inform systematics and conservation.

KW - Ecological differentiation

KW - Evolutionary divergence

KW - Genetic variation

KW - Intraspecific taxonomy

KW - Prairie dog

KW - Subspecies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898631865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898631865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.03.010

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.03.010

M3 - Article

VL - 174

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

ER -