Evaluation’s Race Problem in the United States

A Call to Action for the Profession and the American Journal of Evaluation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite political and rhetorical pronouncements of a reduction in racism, growing inequity in U.S. society continues to feature race as a prominent fault line with no evidence of reduction on the horizon. Of significant concern is the degree to which inequity among racially identified subgroups of the population link to policies and practices of local, state, and federal government and thereby influence the operation and evaluation of important programs and services. Evaluation as a principal tool of knowledge creation on behalf of government and the public trust must examine its role with respect to these alarming trends and potential vulnerability. The author examines how race and racism (particularly as focused on African American communities) may influence the theories, models, practices, and techniques of evaluation and calls for creation of an ongoing forum in the American Journal of Evaluation where these critical issues can receive thoughtful and continuous attention from the field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)569-583
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Journal of Evaluation
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

race problem
Racism
profession
evaluation
racism
State Government
Local Government
Federal Government
Program Evaluation
African Americans
model theory
vulnerability
Population
Evaluation
trend
community
evidence

Keywords

  • framing of race and racism
  • institutionalized inequity
  • professional ethics
  • program evaluation
  • race and racism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

@article{23e4cc5cb67c4ddaa57591f58d4651f3,
title = "Evaluation’s Race Problem in the United States: A Call to Action for the Profession and the American Journal of Evaluation",
abstract = "Despite political and rhetorical pronouncements of a reduction in racism, growing inequity in U.S. society continues to feature race as a prominent fault line with no evidence of reduction on the horizon. Of significant concern is the degree to which inequity among racially identified subgroups of the population link to policies and practices of local, state, and federal government and thereby influence the operation and evaluation of important programs and services. Evaluation as a principal tool of knowledge creation on behalf of government and the public trust must examine its role with respect to these alarming trends and potential vulnerability. The author examines how race and racism (particularly as focused on African American communities) may influence the theories, models, practices, and techniques of evaluation and calls for creation of an ongoing forum in the American Journal of Evaluation where these critical issues can receive thoughtful and continuous attention from the field.",
keywords = "framing of race and racism, institutionalized inequity, professional ethics, program evaluation, race and racism",
author = "Hall, {Melvin E}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1098214018792624",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "569--583",
journal = "American Journal of Evaluation",
issn = "1098-2140",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation’s Race Problem in the United States

T2 - A Call to Action for the Profession and the American Journal of Evaluation

AU - Hall, Melvin E

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Despite political and rhetorical pronouncements of a reduction in racism, growing inequity in U.S. society continues to feature race as a prominent fault line with no evidence of reduction on the horizon. Of significant concern is the degree to which inequity among racially identified subgroups of the population link to policies and practices of local, state, and federal government and thereby influence the operation and evaluation of important programs and services. Evaluation as a principal tool of knowledge creation on behalf of government and the public trust must examine its role with respect to these alarming trends and potential vulnerability. The author examines how race and racism (particularly as focused on African American communities) may influence the theories, models, practices, and techniques of evaluation and calls for creation of an ongoing forum in the American Journal of Evaluation where these critical issues can receive thoughtful and continuous attention from the field.

AB - Despite political and rhetorical pronouncements of a reduction in racism, growing inequity in U.S. society continues to feature race as a prominent fault line with no evidence of reduction on the horizon. Of significant concern is the degree to which inequity among racially identified subgroups of the population link to policies and practices of local, state, and federal government and thereby influence the operation and evaluation of important programs and services. Evaluation as a principal tool of knowledge creation on behalf of government and the public trust must examine its role with respect to these alarming trends and potential vulnerability. The author examines how race and racism (particularly as focused on African American communities) may influence the theories, models, practices, and techniques of evaluation and calls for creation of an ongoing forum in the American Journal of Evaluation where these critical issues can receive thoughtful and continuous attention from the field.

KW - framing of race and racism

KW - institutionalized inequity

KW - professional ethics

KW - program evaluation

KW - race and racism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057051285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057051285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1098214018792624

DO - 10.1177/1098214018792624

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 569

EP - 583

JO - American Journal of Evaluation

JF - American Journal of Evaluation

SN - 1098-2140

IS - 4

ER -