Evaluation of methods for estimating soil carbon dioxide efflux across a gradient of forest disturbance

B. W. Sullivan, S. Dore, Thomas E Kolb, S. C. Hart, M. C. Montes-Helu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Better understanding of variation in soil carbon dioxide (CO2) efflux caused by measurement techniques is needed, especially over gradients of site disturbance, to accurately estimate the global carbon cycle. We present soil CO2 efflux data from a gradient of disturbance to ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa C. Lawson var. scopulorum Engelm.) forests in northern Arizona, USA that were obtained using four different techniques: vented static chambers, a Licor 6400-09, and soil CO2 diffusion profiles using two different models (Moldrup, Millington-Quirk) to estimate soil gas diffusivity. We also compared soil CO2 efflux measured by the Moldrup and Millington-Quirk diffusion profile methods to nighttime total ecosystem respiration (TER) data from an eddy covariance tower. We addressed four questions: (1) Does the use of a given method to measure soil CO2 efflux bias results across a disturbance gradient? (2) Does the magnitude of difference between observed and modeled estimates of soil CO2 differ between methods and across sites? (3) What is the spatial variability of each method at each site? (4) Which method is closest to the estimate of TER measured by the eddy covariance tower? Although soil CO2 efflux varied significantly among methods the differences were consistent among sites. Measured and modeled total growing season fluxes were generally higher for the Licor 6400-09 and Millington-Quirk diffusion gradient methods compared with static chamber and the Moldrup diffusion gradient methods. A power analysis showed that the larger static chamber was the most efficient method at sampling spatial variation in soil CO2 efflux. Nighttime measurements of soil CO2 efflux from the Moldrup diffusion gradient method were most strongly related to nighttime TER assessed with eddy covariance. The use of a single, well-implemented method to measure soil CO2 efflux is unlikely to create bias in comparisons across a gradient of forest disturbance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2449-2460
Number of pages12
JournalGlobal Change Biology
Volume16
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

soil carbon
Carbon Dioxide
carbon dioxide
Soils
disturbance
Gradient methods
soil
eddy covariance
Ecosystems
respiration
Towers
ecosystem
method
evaluation
soil gas
carbon cycle
diffusivity
growing season
Carbon
spatial variation

Keywords

  • Disturbance gradient
  • Eddy covariance
  • Pinus ponderosa
  • Soil CO efflux
  • Soil diffusion profile
  • Soil respiration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry

Cite this

Evaluation of methods for estimating soil carbon dioxide efflux across a gradient of forest disturbance. / Sullivan, B. W.; Dore, S.; Kolb, Thomas E; Hart, S. C.; Montes-Helu, M. C.

In: Global Change Biology, Vol. 16, No. 9, 09.2010, p. 2449-2460.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sullivan, B. W. ; Dore, S. ; Kolb, Thomas E ; Hart, S. C. ; Montes-Helu, M. C. / Evaluation of methods for estimating soil carbon dioxide efflux across a gradient of forest disturbance. In: Global Change Biology. 2010 ; Vol. 16, No. 9. pp. 2449-2460.
@article{49b9928b65c148b9be84f21b35ab5d1c,
title = "Evaluation of methods for estimating soil carbon dioxide efflux across a gradient of forest disturbance",
abstract = "Better understanding of variation in soil carbon dioxide (CO2) efflux caused by measurement techniques is needed, especially over gradients of site disturbance, to accurately estimate the global carbon cycle. We present soil CO2 efflux data from a gradient of disturbance to ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa C. Lawson var. scopulorum Engelm.) forests in northern Arizona, USA that were obtained using four different techniques: vented static chambers, a Licor 6400-09, and soil CO2 diffusion profiles using two different models (Moldrup, Millington-Quirk) to estimate soil gas diffusivity. We also compared soil CO2 efflux measured by the Moldrup and Millington-Quirk diffusion profile methods to nighttime total ecosystem respiration (TER) data from an eddy covariance tower. We addressed four questions: (1) Does the use of a given method to measure soil CO2 efflux bias results across a disturbance gradient? (2) Does the magnitude of difference between observed and modeled estimates of soil CO2 differ between methods and across sites? (3) What is the spatial variability of each method at each site? (4) Which method is closest to the estimate of TER measured by the eddy covariance tower? Although soil CO2 efflux varied significantly among methods the differences were consistent among sites. Measured and modeled total growing season fluxes were generally higher for the Licor 6400-09 and Millington-Quirk diffusion gradient methods compared with static chamber and the Moldrup diffusion gradient methods. A power analysis showed that the larger static chamber was the most efficient method at sampling spatial variation in soil CO2 efflux. Nighttime measurements of soil CO2 efflux from the Moldrup diffusion gradient method were most strongly related to nighttime TER assessed with eddy covariance. The use of a single, well-implemented method to measure soil CO2 efflux is unlikely to create bias in comparisons across a gradient of forest disturbance.",
keywords = "Disturbance gradient, Eddy covariance, Pinus ponderosa, Soil CO efflux, Soil diffusion profile, Soil respiration",
author = "Sullivan, {B. W.} and S. Dore and Kolb, {Thomas E} and Hart, {S. C.} and Montes-Helu, {M. C.}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02139.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "2449--2460",
journal = "Global Change Biology",
issn = "1354-1013",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of methods for estimating soil carbon dioxide efflux across a gradient of forest disturbance

AU - Sullivan, B. W.

AU - Dore, S.

AU - Kolb, Thomas E

AU - Hart, S. C.

AU - Montes-Helu, M. C.

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Better understanding of variation in soil carbon dioxide (CO2) efflux caused by measurement techniques is needed, especially over gradients of site disturbance, to accurately estimate the global carbon cycle. We present soil CO2 efflux data from a gradient of disturbance to ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa C. Lawson var. scopulorum Engelm.) forests in northern Arizona, USA that were obtained using four different techniques: vented static chambers, a Licor 6400-09, and soil CO2 diffusion profiles using two different models (Moldrup, Millington-Quirk) to estimate soil gas diffusivity. We also compared soil CO2 efflux measured by the Moldrup and Millington-Quirk diffusion profile methods to nighttime total ecosystem respiration (TER) data from an eddy covariance tower. We addressed four questions: (1) Does the use of a given method to measure soil CO2 efflux bias results across a disturbance gradient? (2) Does the magnitude of difference between observed and modeled estimates of soil CO2 differ between methods and across sites? (3) What is the spatial variability of each method at each site? (4) Which method is closest to the estimate of TER measured by the eddy covariance tower? Although soil CO2 efflux varied significantly among methods the differences were consistent among sites. Measured and modeled total growing season fluxes were generally higher for the Licor 6400-09 and Millington-Quirk diffusion gradient methods compared with static chamber and the Moldrup diffusion gradient methods. A power analysis showed that the larger static chamber was the most efficient method at sampling spatial variation in soil CO2 efflux. Nighttime measurements of soil CO2 efflux from the Moldrup diffusion gradient method were most strongly related to nighttime TER assessed with eddy covariance. The use of a single, well-implemented method to measure soil CO2 efflux is unlikely to create bias in comparisons across a gradient of forest disturbance.

AB - Better understanding of variation in soil carbon dioxide (CO2) efflux caused by measurement techniques is needed, especially over gradients of site disturbance, to accurately estimate the global carbon cycle. We present soil CO2 efflux data from a gradient of disturbance to ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa C. Lawson var. scopulorum Engelm.) forests in northern Arizona, USA that were obtained using four different techniques: vented static chambers, a Licor 6400-09, and soil CO2 diffusion profiles using two different models (Moldrup, Millington-Quirk) to estimate soil gas diffusivity. We also compared soil CO2 efflux measured by the Moldrup and Millington-Quirk diffusion profile methods to nighttime total ecosystem respiration (TER) data from an eddy covariance tower. We addressed four questions: (1) Does the use of a given method to measure soil CO2 efflux bias results across a disturbance gradient? (2) Does the magnitude of difference between observed and modeled estimates of soil CO2 differ between methods and across sites? (3) What is the spatial variability of each method at each site? (4) Which method is closest to the estimate of TER measured by the eddy covariance tower? Although soil CO2 efflux varied significantly among methods the differences were consistent among sites. Measured and modeled total growing season fluxes were generally higher for the Licor 6400-09 and Millington-Quirk diffusion gradient methods compared with static chamber and the Moldrup diffusion gradient methods. A power analysis showed that the larger static chamber was the most efficient method at sampling spatial variation in soil CO2 efflux. Nighttime measurements of soil CO2 efflux from the Moldrup diffusion gradient method were most strongly related to nighttime TER assessed with eddy covariance. The use of a single, well-implemented method to measure soil CO2 efflux is unlikely to create bias in comparisons across a gradient of forest disturbance.

KW - Disturbance gradient

KW - Eddy covariance

KW - Pinus ponderosa

KW - Soil CO efflux

KW - Soil diffusion profile

KW - Soil respiration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955239913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955239913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02139.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02139.x

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 2449

EP - 2460

JO - Global Change Biology

JF - Global Change Biology

SN - 1354-1013

IS - 9

ER -