Evaluation of existing strut-And-tie methods and recommended improvements

Robin G Tuchscherer, David B. Birrcher, Christopher S. Williams, Dean J. Deschenes, Oguzhan Bayrak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of the study summarized in this paper was to develop simple, accurate, and conservative guidelines for the design of deep beams and discontinuity regions. To accomplish this goal, the authors compiled a database of 868 deep-beam shear tests from the literature and fabricated and tested 37 additional deep-beam specimens. The cross-sectional dimensions of the specimens that were tested included 36 × 48 in. (910 × 1220 mm); 21 × 75 in. (530 × 1910 mm); 21 × 42 in. (530 × 1070 mm); and 21 × 23 in. (530 × 580 mm). A comprehensive analysis of the database resulted in the following conclusions: 1) deep-beam shear design provisions of ACI 318-11 and AASHTO LRFD (2010) are overly conservative; and 2) the accuracy of existing design provisions can be improved without compromising their conservative nature. Accordingly, the authors propose recommendations to these methods to form an improved strut-And-tie modeling procedure. The transparently derived procedure is based on fundamental principles, current provisions, and experimental data. The authors recommend adoption of the proposed modifications into the ACI 318 and AASHTO LRFD provisions. An example problem illustrating the use of the proposed method is provided in the Appendix.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1451-1460
Number of pages10
JournalACI Structural Journal
Volume111
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2014

Fingerprint

Struts

Keywords

  • Deep beam
  • Efficiency factor
  • Shear
  • Strut-And-tie modeling
  • Triaxial confinement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Tuchscherer, R. G., Birrcher, D. B., Williams, C. S., Deschenes, D. J., & Bayrak, O. (2014). Evaluation of existing strut-And-tie methods and recommended improvements. ACI Structural Journal, 111(6), 1451-1460. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686926

Evaluation of existing strut-And-tie methods and recommended improvements. / Tuchscherer, Robin G; Birrcher, David B.; Williams, Christopher S.; Deschenes, Dean J.; Bayrak, Oguzhan.

In: ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 111, No. 6, 01.11.2014, p. 1451-1460.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tuchscherer, RG, Birrcher, DB, Williams, CS, Deschenes, DJ & Bayrak, O 2014, 'Evaluation of existing strut-And-tie methods and recommended improvements', ACI Structural Journal, vol. 111, no. 6, pp. 1451-1460. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686926
Tuchscherer, Robin G ; Birrcher, David B. ; Williams, Christopher S. ; Deschenes, Dean J. ; Bayrak, Oguzhan. / Evaluation of existing strut-And-tie methods and recommended improvements. In: ACI Structural Journal. 2014 ; Vol. 111, No. 6. pp. 1451-1460.
@article{c4fba7179b1445de9b55b88baa9a5f3f,
title = "Evaluation of existing strut-And-tie methods and recommended improvements",
abstract = "The objective of the study summarized in this paper was to develop simple, accurate, and conservative guidelines for the design of deep beams and discontinuity regions. To accomplish this goal, the authors compiled a database of 868 deep-beam shear tests from the literature and fabricated and tested 37 additional deep-beam specimens. The cross-sectional dimensions of the specimens that were tested included 36 × 48 in. (910 × 1220 mm); 21 × 75 in. (530 × 1910 mm); 21 × 42 in. (530 × 1070 mm); and 21 × 23 in. (530 × 580 mm). A comprehensive analysis of the database resulted in the following conclusions: 1) deep-beam shear design provisions of ACI 318-11 and AASHTO LRFD (2010) are overly conservative; and 2) the accuracy of existing design provisions can be improved without compromising their conservative nature. Accordingly, the authors propose recommendations to these methods to form an improved strut-And-tie modeling procedure. The transparently derived procedure is based on fundamental principles, current provisions, and experimental data. The authors recommend adoption of the proposed modifications into the ACI 318 and AASHTO LRFD provisions. An example problem illustrating the use of the proposed method is provided in the Appendix.",
keywords = "Deep beam, Efficiency factor, Shear, Strut-And-tie modeling, Triaxial confinement",
author = "Tuchscherer, {Robin G} and Birrcher, {David B.} and Williams, {Christopher S.} and Deschenes, {Dean J.} and Oguzhan Bayrak",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.14359/51686926",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "111",
pages = "1451--1460",
journal = "ACI Structural Journal",
issn = "0889-3241",
publisher = "American Concrete Institute",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of existing strut-And-tie methods and recommended improvements

AU - Tuchscherer, Robin G

AU - Birrcher, David B.

AU - Williams, Christopher S.

AU - Deschenes, Dean J.

AU - Bayrak, Oguzhan

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - The objective of the study summarized in this paper was to develop simple, accurate, and conservative guidelines for the design of deep beams and discontinuity regions. To accomplish this goal, the authors compiled a database of 868 deep-beam shear tests from the literature and fabricated and tested 37 additional deep-beam specimens. The cross-sectional dimensions of the specimens that were tested included 36 × 48 in. (910 × 1220 mm); 21 × 75 in. (530 × 1910 mm); 21 × 42 in. (530 × 1070 mm); and 21 × 23 in. (530 × 580 mm). A comprehensive analysis of the database resulted in the following conclusions: 1) deep-beam shear design provisions of ACI 318-11 and AASHTO LRFD (2010) are overly conservative; and 2) the accuracy of existing design provisions can be improved without compromising their conservative nature. Accordingly, the authors propose recommendations to these methods to form an improved strut-And-tie modeling procedure. The transparently derived procedure is based on fundamental principles, current provisions, and experimental data. The authors recommend adoption of the proposed modifications into the ACI 318 and AASHTO LRFD provisions. An example problem illustrating the use of the proposed method is provided in the Appendix.

AB - The objective of the study summarized in this paper was to develop simple, accurate, and conservative guidelines for the design of deep beams and discontinuity regions. To accomplish this goal, the authors compiled a database of 868 deep-beam shear tests from the literature and fabricated and tested 37 additional deep-beam specimens. The cross-sectional dimensions of the specimens that were tested included 36 × 48 in. (910 × 1220 mm); 21 × 75 in. (530 × 1910 mm); 21 × 42 in. (530 × 1070 mm); and 21 × 23 in. (530 × 580 mm). A comprehensive analysis of the database resulted in the following conclusions: 1) deep-beam shear design provisions of ACI 318-11 and AASHTO LRFD (2010) are overly conservative; and 2) the accuracy of existing design provisions can be improved without compromising their conservative nature. Accordingly, the authors propose recommendations to these methods to form an improved strut-And-tie modeling procedure. The transparently derived procedure is based on fundamental principles, current provisions, and experimental data. The authors recommend adoption of the proposed modifications into the ACI 318 and AASHTO LRFD provisions. An example problem illustrating the use of the proposed method is provided in the Appendix.

KW - Deep beam

KW - Efficiency factor

KW - Shear

KW - Strut-And-tie modeling

KW - Triaxial confinement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84917678009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84917678009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14359/51686926

DO - 10.14359/51686926

M3 - Article

VL - 111

SP - 1451

EP - 1460

JO - ACI Structural Journal

JF - ACI Structural Journal

SN - 0889-3241

IS - 6

ER -