Evaluating the Accuracy of Ground-Based Hemlock Dwarf Mistletoe Rating

A Case Study Using the Wind River Canopy Crane

David Shaw, Elizabeth A. Freeman, Robert L Mathiasen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The accuracy of ground based estimates using the six-class dwarf mistletoe rating system was evaluated in an old-growth Douglas-fir/western hemlock forest by comparing ground ratings by five different observers to an examination of tree crowns from a construction crane at the Wind River Canopy Crane Research Facility, Washington. A total of 139 dominant, codominant, and intermediate western hemlock were evaluated. No consistent pattern emerged to indicate where overall error was made. All but one observer was relatively accurate at identifying noninfected trees (73 to 95% noninfected trees accurately rated by four observers). However, the observers were less accurate at estimating the DMR class of the infected trees (11% to 37% of the infected trees accurately rated), including a number of trees incorrectly rated by two or more DMR classes. One observer rated 98% of the trees as having infections, while the crane survey estimated only 53% of the trees as having infections. Each observer divided the individual tree crowns into thirds and estimated infections based on summing lower, middle, and upper canopy levels. There was no pattern to the errors associated with estimates by canopy level. One observer significantly overestimated all canopy levels, one observer estimated all accurately, one observer significantly underestimated all canopy levels, one observer underestimated the mid and upper canopies, and one observer underestimated the lower and upper canopies. The principal reasons for inaccurate dwarf mistletoe ratings were assumed to be difficulty in accurately estimating crown thirds, misidentification of infections because of various stem deformities or accumulation of organic debris resembling infections, and the difficulty in observing infections high above the ground and through dense vegetation. Only one of the five observers accurately represented the spatial pattern of the infection center. The implications of this research vary depending on whether the results are to be used for timber management or for research and modeling applications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8-14
Number of pages7
JournalWestern Journal of Applied Forestry
Volume15
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2000

Fingerprint

Santalales
crane
canopy
case studies
rivers
river
infection
tree crown
timber management
tree classes
research facilities
Pseudotsuga menziesii
timber
vegetation
stems
stem

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Evaluating the Accuracy of Ground-Based Hemlock Dwarf Mistletoe Rating : A Case Study Using the Wind River Canopy Crane. / Shaw, David; Freeman, Elizabeth A.; Mathiasen, Robert L.

In: Western Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.2000, p. 8-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c02d4c3ab7104d598bb717d449004e5f,
title = "Evaluating the Accuracy of Ground-Based Hemlock Dwarf Mistletoe Rating: A Case Study Using the Wind River Canopy Crane",
abstract = "The accuracy of ground based estimates using the six-class dwarf mistletoe rating system was evaluated in an old-growth Douglas-fir/western hemlock forest by comparing ground ratings by five different observers to an examination of tree crowns from a construction crane at the Wind River Canopy Crane Research Facility, Washington. A total of 139 dominant, codominant, and intermediate western hemlock were evaluated. No consistent pattern emerged to indicate where overall error was made. All but one observer was relatively accurate at identifying noninfected trees (73 to 95{\%} noninfected trees accurately rated by four observers). However, the observers were less accurate at estimating the DMR class of the infected trees (11{\%} to 37{\%} of the infected trees accurately rated), including a number of trees incorrectly rated by two or more DMR classes. One observer rated 98{\%} of the trees as having infections, while the crane survey estimated only 53{\%} of the trees as having infections. Each observer divided the individual tree crowns into thirds and estimated infections based on summing lower, middle, and upper canopy levels. There was no pattern to the errors associated with estimates by canopy level. One observer significantly overestimated all canopy levels, one observer estimated all accurately, one observer significantly underestimated all canopy levels, one observer underestimated the mid and upper canopies, and one observer underestimated the lower and upper canopies. The principal reasons for inaccurate dwarf mistletoe ratings were assumed to be difficulty in accurately estimating crown thirds, misidentification of infections because of various stem deformities or accumulation of organic debris resembling infections, and the difficulty in observing infections high above the ground and through dense vegetation. Only one of the five observers accurately represented the spatial pattern of the infection center. The implications of this research vary depending on whether the results are to be used for timber management or for research and modeling applications.",
author = "David Shaw and Freeman, {Elizabeth A.} and Mathiasen, {Robert L}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "8--14",
journal = "Western Journal of Applied Forestry",
issn = "0885-6095",
publisher = "Society of American Foresters",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the Accuracy of Ground-Based Hemlock Dwarf Mistletoe Rating

T2 - A Case Study Using the Wind River Canopy Crane

AU - Shaw, David

AU - Freeman, Elizabeth A.

AU - Mathiasen, Robert L

PY - 2000/1

Y1 - 2000/1

N2 - The accuracy of ground based estimates using the six-class dwarf mistletoe rating system was evaluated in an old-growth Douglas-fir/western hemlock forest by comparing ground ratings by five different observers to an examination of tree crowns from a construction crane at the Wind River Canopy Crane Research Facility, Washington. A total of 139 dominant, codominant, and intermediate western hemlock were evaluated. No consistent pattern emerged to indicate where overall error was made. All but one observer was relatively accurate at identifying noninfected trees (73 to 95% noninfected trees accurately rated by four observers). However, the observers were less accurate at estimating the DMR class of the infected trees (11% to 37% of the infected trees accurately rated), including a number of trees incorrectly rated by two or more DMR classes. One observer rated 98% of the trees as having infections, while the crane survey estimated only 53% of the trees as having infections. Each observer divided the individual tree crowns into thirds and estimated infections based on summing lower, middle, and upper canopy levels. There was no pattern to the errors associated with estimates by canopy level. One observer significantly overestimated all canopy levels, one observer estimated all accurately, one observer significantly underestimated all canopy levels, one observer underestimated the mid and upper canopies, and one observer underestimated the lower and upper canopies. The principal reasons for inaccurate dwarf mistletoe ratings were assumed to be difficulty in accurately estimating crown thirds, misidentification of infections because of various stem deformities or accumulation of organic debris resembling infections, and the difficulty in observing infections high above the ground and through dense vegetation. Only one of the five observers accurately represented the spatial pattern of the infection center. The implications of this research vary depending on whether the results are to be used for timber management or for research and modeling applications.

AB - The accuracy of ground based estimates using the six-class dwarf mistletoe rating system was evaluated in an old-growth Douglas-fir/western hemlock forest by comparing ground ratings by five different observers to an examination of tree crowns from a construction crane at the Wind River Canopy Crane Research Facility, Washington. A total of 139 dominant, codominant, and intermediate western hemlock were evaluated. No consistent pattern emerged to indicate where overall error was made. All but one observer was relatively accurate at identifying noninfected trees (73 to 95% noninfected trees accurately rated by four observers). However, the observers were less accurate at estimating the DMR class of the infected trees (11% to 37% of the infected trees accurately rated), including a number of trees incorrectly rated by two or more DMR classes. One observer rated 98% of the trees as having infections, while the crane survey estimated only 53% of the trees as having infections. Each observer divided the individual tree crowns into thirds and estimated infections based on summing lower, middle, and upper canopy levels. There was no pattern to the errors associated with estimates by canopy level. One observer significantly overestimated all canopy levels, one observer estimated all accurately, one observer significantly underestimated all canopy levels, one observer underestimated the mid and upper canopies, and one observer underestimated the lower and upper canopies. The principal reasons for inaccurate dwarf mistletoe ratings were assumed to be difficulty in accurately estimating crown thirds, misidentification of infections because of various stem deformities or accumulation of organic debris resembling infections, and the difficulty in observing infections high above the ground and through dense vegetation. Only one of the five observers accurately represented the spatial pattern of the infection center. The implications of this research vary depending on whether the results are to be used for timber management or for research and modeling applications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0007297875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0007297875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 8

EP - 14

JO - Western Journal of Applied Forestry

JF - Western Journal of Applied Forestry

SN - 0885-6095

IS - 1

ER -