Estimating the value of watershed services following forest restoration

Julie M Mueller, Wes Swaffar, Erik Nielsen, Abraham E Springer, Sharon Masek Lopez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Declining forest health, climate change, and development threaten the sustainability of water supplies in the western United States. While forest restoration may buffer threats to watershed services, funding shortfalls for landscape-scale restoration efforts limit management action. The hydrologic response and reduction in risk to watersheds following forest restoration treatments could create significant nonmarket benefits for downstream water users. Historic experimental watershed studies indicate a significant and positive response from forest thinning by a reallocation of water from evapotranspiration to surface-water yield. In this study, we estimate the willingness to pay (WTP) for improved watershed services for one group of downstream users, irrigators, following forest restoration activities. We find a positive and statistically significant WTP within our sample of $183.50 per household, at an aggregated benefit of more than $400,000 annually for 2181 irrigators. Our benefit estimate provides evidence that downstream irrigators may be willing to invest in landscape-scale forest restoration to maintain watershed services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1773-1781
Number of pages9
JournalWater Resources Research
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

watershed
willingness to pay
forest health
water yield
thinning
evapotranspiration
water supply
services
restoration
sustainability
surface water
water
climate change

Keywords

  • Bayesian estimation
  • contingent valuation
  • forest restoration
  • watershed services

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Estimating the value of watershed services following forest restoration. / Mueller, Julie M; Swaffar, Wes; Nielsen, Erik; Springer, Abraham E; Lopez, Sharon Masek.

In: Water Resources Research, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2013, p. 1773-1781.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cfe5397dfc54424c9f6f6ddcadb8cd25,
title = "Estimating the value of watershed services following forest restoration",
abstract = "Declining forest health, climate change, and development threaten the sustainability of water supplies in the western United States. While forest restoration may buffer threats to watershed services, funding shortfalls for landscape-scale restoration efforts limit management action. The hydrologic response and reduction in risk to watersheds following forest restoration treatments could create significant nonmarket benefits for downstream water users. Historic experimental watershed studies indicate a significant and positive response from forest thinning by a reallocation of water from evapotranspiration to surface-water yield. In this study, we estimate the willingness to pay (WTP) for improved watershed services for one group of downstream users, irrigators, following forest restoration activities. We find a positive and statistically significant WTP within our sample of $183.50 per household, at an aggregated benefit of more than $400,000 annually for 2181 irrigators. Our benefit estimate provides evidence that downstream irrigators may be willing to invest in landscape-scale forest restoration to maintain watershed services.",
keywords = "Bayesian estimation, contingent valuation, forest restoration, watershed services",
author = "Mueller, {Julie M} and Wes Swaffar and Erik Nielsen and Springer, {Abraham E} and Lopez, {Sharon Masek}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1002/wrcr.20163",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "1773--1781",
journal = "Water Resources Research",
issn = "0043-1397",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating the value of watershed services following forest restoration

AU - Mueller, Julie M

AU - Swaffar, Wes

AU - Nielsen, Erik

AU - Springer, Abraham E

AU - Lopez, Sharon Masek

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Declining forest health, climate change, and development threaten the sustainability of water supplies in the western United States. While forest restoration may buffer threats to watershed services, funding shortfalls for landscape-scale restoration efforts limit management action. The hydrologic response and reduction in risk to watersheds following forest restoration treatments could create significant nonmarket benefits for downstream water users. Historic experimental watershed studies indicate a significant and positive response from forest thinning by a reallocation of water from evapotranspiration to surface-water yield. In this study, we estimate the willingness to pay (WTP) for improved watershed services for one group of downstream users, irrigators, following forest restoration activities. We find a positive and statistically significant WTP within our sample of $183.50 per household, at an aggregated benefit of more than $400,000 annually for 2181 irrigators. Our benefit estimate provides evidence that downstream irrigators may be willing to invest in landscape-scale forest restoration to maintain watershed services.

AB - Declining forest health, climate change, and development threaten the sustainability of water supplies in the western United States. While forest restoration may buffer threats to watershed services, funding shortfalls for landscape-scale restoration efforts limit management action. The hydrologic response and reduction in risk to watersheds following forest restoration treatments could create significant nonmarket benefits for downstream water users. Historic experimental watershed studies indicate a significant and positive response from forest thinning by a reallocation of water from evapotranspiration to surface-water yield. In this study, we estimate the willingness to pay (WTP) for improved watershed services for one group of downstream users, irrigators, following forest restoration activities. We find a positive and statistically significant WTP within our sample of $183.50 per household, at an aggregated benefit of more than $400,000 annually for 2181 irrigators. Our benefit estimate provides evidence that downstream irrigators may be willing to invest in landscape-scale forest restoration to maintain watershed services.

KW - Bayesian estimation

KW - contingent valuation

KW - forest restoration

KW - watershed services

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877980863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877980863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/wrcr.20163

DO - 10.1002/wrcr.20163

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84877980863

VL - 49

SP - 1773

EP - 1781

JO - Water Resources Research

JF - Water Resources Research

SN - 0043-1397

IS - 4

ER -