Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In two experiments, subjects listened to a list of implicational sentences and performed either a comprehension or a memorization task. They were subsequently given a test of free recall or cued recall (with implications as cues). Performance in the comprehension/cued-recall condition was consistently better than that in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions (memorization/cued recall and comprehension/free recall), supporting the hypothesis that encoding/retrieval similarity facilitates recall. In contrast, performance in the memorization/free-recall condition was not consistently better than in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions. Thus, the advantage of encoding/retrieval similarity for recall was clear only in the case of distinctive encoding (specific comprehension responses) and distinctive retrieval cues (implications as cues). The results show the relevance of distinctiveness and encoding/retrieval compatibility for memory of meaningful material.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-174
Number of pages4
JournalBulletin of the Psychonomic Society
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1983
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Data storage equipment
Experiments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Catalysis
  • Chemistry(all)

Cite this

Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences. / Till, Robert E.

In: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1983, p. 171-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{620becb858454cd0b19669c93e9126c7,
title = "Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences",
abstract = "In two experiments, subjects listened to a list of implicational sentences and performed either a comprehension or a memorization task. They were subsequently given a test of free recall or cued recall (with implications as cues). Performance in the comprehension/cued-recall condition was consistently better than that in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions (memorization/cued recall and comprehension/free recall), supporting the hypothesis that encoding/retrieval similarity facilitates recall. In contrast, performance in the memorization/free-recall condition was not consistently better than in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions. Thus, the advantage of encoding/retrieval similarity for recall was clear only in the case of distinctive encoding (specific comprehension responses) and distinctive retrieval cues (implications as cues). The results show the relevance of distinctiveness and encoding/retrieval compatibility for memory of meaningful material.",
author = "Till, {Robert E}",
year = "1983",
doi = "10.3758/BF03334678",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "171--174",
journal = "Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society",
issn = "0090-5054",
publisher = "Psychonomic Society Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences

AU - Till, Robert E

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - In two experiments, subjects listened to a list of implicational sentences and performed either a comprehension or a memorization task. They were subsequently given a test of free recall or cued recall (with implications as cues). Performance in the comprehension/cued-recall condition was consistently better than that in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions (memorization/cued recall and comprehension/free recall), supporting the hypothesis that encoding/retrieval similarity facilitates recall. In contrast, performance in the memorization/free-recall condition was not consistently better than in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions. Thus, the advantage of encoding/retrieval similarity for recall was clear only in the case of distinctive encoding (specific comprehension responses) and distinctive retrieval cues (implications as cues). The results show the relevance of distinctiveness and encoding/retrieval compatibility for memory of meaningful material.

AB - In two experiments, subjects listened to a list of implicational sentences and performed either a comprehension or a memorization task. They were subsequently given a test of free recall or cued recall (with implications as cues). Performance in the comprehension/cued-recall condition was consistently better than that in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions (memorization/cued recall and comprehension/free recall), supporting the hypothesis that encoding/retrieval similarity facilitates recall. In contrast, performance in the memorization/free-recall condition was not consistently better than in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions. Thus, the advantage of encoding/retrieval similarity for recall was clear only in the case of distinctive encoding (specific comprehension responses) and distinctive retrieval cues (implications as cues). The results show the relevance of distinctiveness and encoding/retrieval compatibility for memory of meaningful material.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84912434545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84912434545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03334678

DO - 10.3758/BF03334678

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 171

EP - 174

JO - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

JF - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

SN - 0090-5054

IS - 3

ER -