Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity

Christopher C Woodruff, Hiroki R. Hayama, Michael D. Rugg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

179 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were employed to investigate electrophysiological correlates of recognition memory in a task that allowed segregation of test items according to whether they were recollected (operationalized by introspective report) or, if recollection failed, their level of familiarity (operationalized by recognition confidence). The amplitude of a negative-going ERP deflection that onsets around 300 ms post-stimulus varied inversely with familiarity strength. This effect was maximal over the left frontal scalp. It did not differ between the ERPs elicited by highly familiar versus recollected items, indicating that the recollection is not merely a consequence of strong familiarity. By contrast, a later positive deflection (onset ca. 500 ms post-stimulus) was enhanced in ERPs elicited by recollected relative to highly familiar items. This effect was maximal over the left posterior scalp and was insensitive to familiarity, as indicated by its absence in the contrast between items judged highly familiar versus highly unfamiliar. The findings constitute a double dissociation between the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. Together with the results of a parallel functional magnetic resonance imaging study (A.P. Yonelinas et al., J. Neurosci. (2005), 25, 3002-3008), they indicate that recollection and familiarity rely on qualitatively distinct neural systems and strongly support dual-process models of recognition memory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)125-135
Number of pages11
JournalBrain Research
Volume1100
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 19 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Evoked Potentials
Scalp
Recognition (Psychology)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Keywords

  • Confidence
  • Dual process
  • ERP
  • Familiarity
  • Recognition memory
  • Recollection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Molecular Biology

Cite this

Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. / Woodruff, Christopher C; Hayama, Hiroki R.; Rugg, Michael D.

In: Brain Research, Vol. 1100, No. 1, 19.07.2006, p. 125-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Woodruff, Christopher C ; Hayama, Hiroki R. ; Rugg, Michael D. / Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. In: Brain Research. 2006 ; Vol. 1100, No. 1. pp. 125-135.
@article{c9ca7a35f0b04a7c8f22edc1661561be,
title = "Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity",
abstract = "Event-related potentials (ERPs) were employed to investigate electrophysiological correlates of recognition memory in a task that allowed segregation of test items according to whether they were recollected (operationalized by introspective report) or, if recollection failed, their level of familiarity (operationalized by recognition confidence). The amplitude of a negative-going ERP deflection that onsets around 300 ms post-stimulus varied inversely with familiarity strength. This effect was maximal over the left frontal scalp. It did not differ between the ERPs elicited by highly familiar versus recollected items, indicating that the recollection is not merely a consequence of strong familiarity. By contrast, a later positive deflection (onset ca. 500 ms post-stimulus) was enhanced in ERPs elicited by recollected relative to highly familiar items. This effect was maximal over the left posterior scalp and was insensitive to familiarity, as indicated by its absence in the contrast between items judged highly familiar versus highly unfamiliar. The findings constitute a double dissociation between the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. Together with the results of a parallel functional magnetic resonance imaging study (A.P. Yonelinas et al., J. Neurosci. (2005), 25, 3002-3008), they indicate that recollection and familiarity rely on qualitatively distinct neural systems and strongly support dual-process models of recognition memory.",
keywords = "Confidence, Dual process, ERP, Familiarity, Recognition memory, Recollection",
author = "Woodruff, {Christopher C} and Hayama, {Hiroki R.} and Rugg, {Michael D.}",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1016/j.brainres.2006.05.019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1100",
pages = "125--135",
journal = "Brain Research",
issn = "0006-8993",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity

AU - Woodruff, Christopher C

AU - Hayama, Hiroki R.

AU - Rugg, Michael D.

PY - 2006/7/19

Y1 - 2006/7/19

N2 - Event-related potentials (ERPs) were employed to investigate electrophysiological correlates of recognition memory in a task that allowed segregation of test items according to whether they were recollected (operationalized by introspective report) or, if recollection failed, their level of familiarity (operationalized by recognition confidence). The amplitude of a negative-going ERP deflection that onsets around 300 ms post-stimulus varied inversely with familiarity strength. This effect was maximal over the left frontal scalp. It did not differ between the ERPs elicited by highly familiar versus recollected items, indicating that the recollection is not merely a consequence of strong familiarity. By contrast, a later positive deflection (onset ca. 500 ms post-stimulus) was enhanced in ERPs elicited by recollected relative to highly familiar items. This effect was maximal over the left posterior scalp and was insensitive to familiarity, as indicated by its absence in the contrast between items judged highly familiar versus highly unfamiliar. The findings constitute a double dissociation between the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. Together with the results of a parallel functional magnetic resonance imaging study (A.P. Yonelinas et al., J. Neurosci. (2005), 25, 3002-3008), they indicate that recollection and familiarity rely on qualitatively distinct neural systems and strongly support dual-process models of recognition memory.

AB - Event-related potentials (ERPs) were employed to investigate electrophysiological correlates of recognition memory in a task that allowed segregation of test items according to whether they were recollected (operationalized by introspective report) or, if recollection failed, their level of familiarity (operationalized by recognition confidence). The amplitude of a negative-going ERP deflection that onsets around 300 ms post-stimulus varied inversely with familiarity strength. This effect was maximal over the left frontal scalp. It did not differ between the ERPs elicited by highly familiar versus recollected items, indicating that the recollection is not merely a consequence of strong familiarity. By contrast, a later positive deflection (onset ca. 500 ms post-stimulus) was enhanced in ERPs elicited by recollected relative to highly familiar items. This effect was maximal over the left posterior scalp and was insensitive to familiarity, as indicated by its absence in the contrast between items judged highly familiar versus highly unfamiliar. The findings constitute a double dissociation between the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. Together with the results of a parallel functional magnetic resonance imaging study (A.P. Yonelinas et al., J. Neurosci. (2005), 25, 3002-3008), they indicate that recollection and familiarity rely on qualitatively distinct neural systems and strongly support dual-process models of recognition memory.

KW - Confidence

KW - Dual process

KW - ERP

KW - Familiarity

KW - Recognition memory

KW - Recollection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745895316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745895316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.05.019

DO - 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.05.019

M3 - Article

VL - 1100

SP - 125

EP - 135

JO - Brain Research

JF - Brain Research

SN - 0006-8993

IS - 1

ER -