Electromyography and the evolution of motor control: Limitations and insights

Anthony Herrel, Vicky Schaerlaeken, Callum Ross, Jay Meyers, Kiisa Nishikawa, Virginia Abdala, Adriana Manzano, Peter Aerts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Electromyography (EMG), or the study of muscle activation patterns, has long been used to infer central nervous system (CNS) control of the musculoskeletal system and the evolution of that control. As the activation of the muscles at the level of the periphery is a reflection of the interaction of descending influences and local reflex control, EMG is an important tool in integrated investigations of the evolution of coordination in complex, musculoskeletal systems. Yet, the use of EMG as a tool to understand the evolution of motor control has its limitations. We here review the potential limitations and opportunities of the use of EMG in studying the evolution of motor control in vertebrates and provide original previously unpublished data to illustrate this. The relative timing of activation of a set of muscles can be used to evaluate CNS coordination of the components in a musculoskeletal system. Studies of relative timing reveal task-dependent variability in the recruitment of different populations of muscle fibers (i.e., different fiber types) within a single muscle, and left-right asymmetries in activation that need to be taken into account in comparative studies. The magnitude of muscle recruitment is strongly influenced by the instantaneous demands imposed on the system, and is likely determined by local reflex-control systems. Consequently, using EMG to make meaningful inferences about evolutionary changes in musculoskeletal control requires comparisons across similar functional tasks. Moreover, our data show that inferences about the evolution of motor control are limited in their explanatory power without proper insights into the kinematics and dynamics of a system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)261-271
Number of pages11
JournalIntegrative and Comparative Biology
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2008

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Herrel, A., Schaerlaeken, V., Ross, C., Meyers, J., Nishikawa, K., Abdala, V., Manzano, A., & Aerts, P. (2008). Electromyography and the evolution of motor control: Limitations and insights. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 48(2), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icn025