Effects of semantic and nonsemantic cued orienting tasks on associative clustering in free recall

Robert E Till, Randy L. Diehl, James J. Jenkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During presentation of a randomized list of nonadjacent associative pairs, Ss heard a cue after each word designating the task to be performed. All Ss performed two tasks. In the identical condition, Ss performed the same task on both members of an associative pair. In the nonidentical condition, Ss never performed the same task on pair members. Semantic tasks led to greater recall than did nonsemantic tasks. Also, percentage of clustering was greater when the second member of a recalled cluster had been used in a semantic task rather than a nonsemantic one. Identical and nonidentical conditions did not differ in the measure of recall. When the two tasks were a combination of one semantic and one nonsemantic task, the identical condition showed a greater percentage of clustering than the nonidentical condition. However, when the two tasks were both semantic, no difference in clustering was obtained.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-23
Number of pages5
JournalMemory & Cognition
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1975
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Semantics
Cluster Analysis
Cues
Free Recall
Associative

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Effects of semantic and nonsemantic cued orienting tasks on associative clustering in free recall. / Till, Robert E; Diehl, Randy L.; Jenkins, James J.

In: Memory & Cognition, Vol. 3, No. 1, 01.1975, p. 19-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7345d5c64f354f60b7fd2a4d6e6a81db,
title = "Effects of semantic and nonsemantic cued orienting tasks on associative clustering in free recall",
abstract = "During presentation of a randomized list of nonadjacent associative pairs, Ss heard a cue after each word designating the task to be performed. All Ss performed two tasks. In the identical condition, Ss performed the same task on both members of an associative pair. In the nonidentical condition, Ss never performed the same task on pair members. Semantic tasks led to greater recall than did nonsemantic tasks. Also, percentage of clustering was greater when the second member of a recalled cluster had been used in a semantic task rather than a nonsemantic one. Identical and nonidentical conditions did not differ in the measure of recall. When the two tasks were a combination of one semantic and one nonsemantic task, the identical condition showed a greater percentage of clustering than the nonidentical condition. However, when the two tasks were both semantic, no difference in clustering was obtained.",
author = "Till, {Robert E} and Diehl, {Randy L.} and Jenkins, {James J.}",
year = "1975",
month = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03198203",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "19--23",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of semantic and nonsemantic cued orienting tasks on associative clustering in free recall

AU - Till, Robert E

AU - Diehl, Randy L.

AU - Jenkins, James J.

PY - 1975/1

Y1 - 1975/1

N2 - During presentation of a randomized list of nonadjacent associative pairs, Ss heard a cue after each word designating the task to be performed. All Ss performed two tasks. In the identical condition, Ss performed the same task on both members of an associative pair. In the nonidentical condition, Ss never performed the same task on pair members. Semantic tasks led to greater recall than did nonsemantic tasks. Also, percentage of clustering was greater when the second member of a recalled cluster had been used in a semantic task rather than a nonsemantic one. Identical and nonidentical conditions did not differ in the measure of recall. When the two tasks were a combination of one semantic and one nonsemantic task, the identical condition showed a greater percentage of clustering than the nonidentical condition. However, when the two tasks were both semantic, no difference in clustering was obtained.

AB - During presentation of a randomized list of nonadjacent associative pairs, Ss heard a cue after each word designating the task to be performed. All Ss performed two tasks. In the identical condition, Ss performed the same task on both members of an associative pair. In the nonidentical condition, Ss never performed the same task on pair members. Semantic tasks led to greater recall than did nonsemantic tasks. Also, percentage of clustering was greater when the second member of a recalled cluster had been used in a semantic task rather than a nonsemantic one. Identical and nonidentical conditions did not differ in the measure of recall. When the two tasks were a combination of one semantic and one nonsemantic task, the identical condition showed a greater percentage of clustering than the nonidentical condition. However, when the two tasks were both semantic, no difference in clustering was obtained.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248939045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248939045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03198203

DO - 10.3758/BF03198203

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 19

EP - 23

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 1

ER -