Effects of Second Language Pronunciation Teaching Revisited

A Proposed Measurement Framework and Meta-Analysis

Kazuya Saito, Luke D Plonsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We propose a new framework for conceptualizing measures of instructed second language (L2) pronunciation performance according to three sets of parameters: (a) the constructs (focused on global vs. specific aspects of pronunciation), (b) the scoring method (human raters vs. acoustic analyses), and (c) the type of knowledge elicited (controlled vs. spontaneous). Adopting this model (Framework for L2 Pronunciation Measurement) as a synthetic tool, we coded the instruments found in 77 studies of L2 pronunciation teaching published between 1982 and 2017. We calculated the frequency of each measurement type and reexamined the interaction of instructional effectiveness and measurement within the sample. According to the results, instruction is most effective when it targets learners’ monitored production of specific segmental or suprasegmental features. The efficacy of instruction remains relatively unclear when gains are measured globally via subjective, human judgments, especially at a spontaneous level. Open Practices: This article has been awarded an Open Materials badge. All materials are publicly accessible via the IRIS database at https://www.iris-database.org. Learn more about the Open Practices badges from the Center for Open Science: https://osf.io/tvyxz/wiki.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalLanguage Learning
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Teaching
language
instruction
acoustics
interaction
science
performance
Language
Meta-analysis
Data Base
Acoustics
Interaction
Wikis
Efficacy
Controlled
Scoring
Suprasegmental Features
Raters

Keywords

  • instructed SLA
  • meta-analysis
  • pronunciation
  • pronunciation teaching
  • research synthesis
  • second language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{d11b73ec29224d26a708893bf2aa3067,
title = "Effects of Second Language Pronunciation Teaching Revisited: A Proposed Measurement Framework and Meta-Analysis",
abstract = "We propose a new framework for conceptualizing measures of instructed second language (L2) pronunciation performance according to three sets of parameters: (a) the constructs (focused on global vs. specific aspects of pronunciation), (b) the scoring method (human raters vs. acoustic analyses), and (c) the type of knowledge elicited (controlled vs. spontaneous). Adopting this model (Framework for L2 Pronunciation Measurement) as a synthetic tool, we coded the instruments found in 77 studies of L2 pronunciation teaching published between 1982 and 2017. We calculated the frequency of each measurement type and reexamined the interaction of instructional effectiveness and measurement within the sample. According to the results, instruction is most effective when it targets learners’ monitored production of specific segmental or suprasegmental features. The efficacy of instruction remains relatively unclear when gains are measured globally via subjective, human judgments, especially at a spontaneous level. Open Practices: This article has been awarded an Open Materials badge. All materials are publicly accessible via the IRIS database at https://www.iris-database.org. Learn more about the Open Practices badges from the Center for Open Science: https://osf.io/tvyxz/wiki.",
keywords = "instructed SLA, meta-analysis, pronunciation, pronunciation teaching, research synthesis, second language",
author = "Kazuya Saito and Plonsky, {Luke D}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/lang.12345",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Language Learning",
issn = "0023-8333",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of Second Language Pronunciation Teaching Revisited

T2 - A Proposed Measurement Framework and Meta-Analysis

AU - Saito, Kazuya

AU - Plonsky, Luke D

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - We propose a new framework for conceptualizing measures of instructed second language (L2) pronunciation performance according to three sets of parameters: (a) the constructs (focused on global vs. specific aspects of pronunciation), (b) the scoring method (human raters vs. acoustic analyses), and (c) the type of knowledge elicited (controlled vs. spontaneous). Adopting this model (Framework for L2 Pronunciation Measurement) as a synthetic tool, we coded the instruments found in 77 studies of L2 pronunciation teaching published between 1982 and 2017. We calculated the frequency of each measurement type and reexamined the interaction of instructional effectiveness and measurement within the sample. According to the results, instruction is most effective when it targets learners’ monitored production of specific segmental or suprasegmental features. The efficacy of instruction remains relatively unclear when gains are measured globally via subjective, human judgments, especially at a spontaneous level. Open Practices: This article has been awarded an Open Materials badge. All materials are publicly accessible via the IRIS database at https://www.iris-database.org. Learn more about the Open Practices badges from the Center for Open Science: https://osf.io/tvyxz/wiki.

AB - We propose a new framework for conceptualizing measures of instructed second language (L2) pronunciation performance according to three sets of parameters: (a) the constructs (focused on global vs. specific aspects of pronunciation), (b) the scoring method (human raters vs. acoustic analyses), and (c) the type of knowledge elicited (controlled vs. spontaneous). Adopting this model (Framework for L2 Pronunciation Measurement) as a synthetic tool, we coded the instruments found in 77 studies of L2 pronunciation teaching published between 1982 and 2017. We calculated the frequency of each measurement type and reexamined the interaction of instructional effectiveness and measurement within the sample. According to the results, instruction is most effective when it targets learners’ monitored production of specific segmental or suprasegmental features. The efficacy of instruction remains relatively unclear when gains are measured globally via subjective, human judgments, especially at a spontaneous level. Open Practices: This article has been awarded an Open Materials badge. All materials are publicly accessible via the IRIS database at https://www.iris-database.org. Learn more about the Open Practices badges from the Center for Open Science: https://osf.io/tvyxz/wiki.

KW - instructed SLA

KW - meta-analysis

KW - pronunciation

KW - pronunciation teaching

KW - research synthesis

KW - second language

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065162581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065162581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/lang.12345

DO - 10.1111/lang.12345

M3 - Article

JO - Language Learning

JF - Language Learning

SN - 0023-8333

ER -