Effects of point-count duration on estimated detection probabilities and occupancy of breeding birds

Matthias Leu, Matthew L. Farnsworth, Erica Fleishman, David S. Dobkin, Rick D. Scherer, Barry R. Noon, Brett G Dickson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Increasingly, point-count data are used to estimate occupancy, the probability that a species is present at a given location; occupancy accounts for imperfect detection, the probability that a species is detected given that it is present. To our knowledge, effects of sampling duration on inferences from models of bird occupancy have not been evaluated. Our objective was to determine whether changing count duration from 5 to 8 min affected inferences about the occupancy of birds sampled in the Chesapeake Bay Lowlands (eastern United States) and the central and western Great Basin (western United States) in 2012 and 2013. We examined the proportion of species (two doves, one cuckoo, two swifts, five hummingbirds, 11 woodpeckers, and 122 passerines) for which estimates of detection probability were ≥ 0.3. For species with single-season detection probabilities ≥ 0.3, we compared occupancy estimates derived from 5- and 8-min counts. We also compared estimates for three species sampled annually for 5 yr in the central Great Basin. Detection probabilities based on both the 5- and 8-min counts were ≥ 0.3 for 40% ± 3% of the species in an ecosystem. Extending the count duration from 5 to 8 min increased the detection probability to ≥ 0.3 for 5% ± 0.5% of the species. We found no difference in occupancy estimates that were based on 5- versus 8-min counts for species sampled over two or five consecutive years. However, for 97% of species sampled over 2 yr, precision of occupancy estimates that were based on 8-min counts averaged 12% ± 2% higher than those based on 5-min counts. We suggest that it may be worthwhile to conduct a pilot season to determine the number of locations and surveys needed to achieve detection probabilities that are sufficiently high to estimate occupancy for species of interest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)80-93
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Field Ornithology
Volume88
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

duration
birds
breeding
basins
hummingbirds
Apodidae
doves
woodpeckers
Eastern United States
Western United States
Chesapeake Bay
detection
effect
breeding bird
bird
lowlands
passerine
basin
ecosystems
ecosystem

Keywords

  • avian survey design
  • Chesapeake Bay Lowlands
  • Great Basin
  • point count
  • single-season occupancy model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Effects of point-count duration on estimated detection probabilities and occupancy of breeding birds. / Leu, Matthias; Farnsworth, Matthew L.; Fleishman, Erica; Dobkin, David S.; Scherer, Rick D.; Noon, Barry R.; Dickson, Brett G.

In: Journal of Field Ornithology, Vol. 88, No. 1, 01.03.2017, p. 80-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leu, Matthias ; Farnsworth, Matthew L. ; Fleishman, Erica ; Dobkin, David S. ; Scherer, Rick D. ; Noon, Barry R. ; Dickson, Brett G. / Effects of point-count duration on estimated detection probabilities and occupancy of breeding birds. In: Journal of Field Ornithology. 2017 ; Vol. 88, No. 1. pp. 80-93.
@article{7717e3e6628345089328788027e1cf00,
title = "Effects of point-count duration on estimated detection probabilities and occupancy of breeding birds",
abstract = "Increasingly, point-count data are used to estimate occupancy, the probability that a species is present at a given location; occupancy accounts for imperfect detection, the probability that a species is detected given that it is present. To our knowledge, effects of sampling duration on inferences from models of bird occupancy have not been evaluated. Our objective was to determine whether changing count duration from 5 to 8 min affected inferences about the occupancy of birds sampled in the Chesapeake Bay Lowlands (eastern United States) and the central and western Great Basin (western United States) in 2012 and 2013. We examined the proportion of species (two doves, one cuckoo, two swifts, five hummingbirds, 11 woodpeckers, and 122 passerines) for which estimates of detection probability were ≥ 0.3. For species with single-season detection probabilities ≥ 0.3, we compared occupancy estimates derived from 5- and 8-min counts. We also compared estimates for three species sampled annually for 5 yr in the central Great Basin. Detection probabilities based on both the 5- and 8-min counts were ≥ 0.3 for 40{\%} ± 3{\%} of the species in an ecosystem. Extending the count duration from 5 to 8 min increased the detection probability to ≥ 0.3 for 5{\%} ± 0.5{\%} of the species. We found no difference in occupancy estimates that were based on 5- versus 8-min counts for species sampled over two or five consecutive years. However, for 97{\%} of species sampled over 2 yr, precision of occupancy estimates that were based on 8-min counts averaged 12{\%} ± 2{\%} higher than those based on 5-min counts. We suggest that it may be worthwhile to conduct a pilot season to determine the number of locations and surveys needed to achieve detection probabilities that are sufficiently high to estimate occupancy for species of interest.",
keywords = "avian survey design, Chesapeake Bay Lowlands, Great Basin, point count, single-season occupancy model",
author = "Matthias Leu and Farnsworth, {Matthew L.} and Erica Fleishman and Dobkin, {David S.} and Scherer, {Rick D.} and Noon, {Barry R.} and Dickson, {Brett G}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jofo.12183",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "80--93",
journal = "Journal of Field Ornithology",
issn = "0273-8570",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of point-count duration on estimated detection probabilities and occupancy of breeding birds

AU - Leu, Matthias

AU - Farnsworth, Matthew L.

AU - Fleishman, Erica

AU - Dobkin, David S.

AU - Scherer, Rick D.

AU - Noon, Barry R.

AU - Dickson, Brett G

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Increasingly, point-count data are used to estimate occupancy, the probability that a species is present at a given location; occupancy accounts for imperfect detection, the probability that a species is detected given that it is present. To our knowledge, effects of sampling duration on inferences from models of bird occupancy have not been evaluated. Our objective was to determine whether changing count duration from 5 to 8 min affected inferences about the occupancy of birds sampled in the Chesapeake Bay Lowlands (eastern United States) and the central and western Great Basin (western United States) in 2012 and 2013. We examined the proportion of species (two doves, one cuckoo, two swifts, five hummingbirds, 11 woodpeckers, and 122 passerines) for which estimates of detection probability were ≥ 0.3. For species with single-season detection probabilities ≥ 0.3, we compared occupancy estimates derived from 5- and 8-min counts. We also compared estimates for three species sampled annually for 5 yr in the central Great Basin. Detection probabilities based on both the 5- and 8-min counts were ≥ 0.3 for 40% ± 3% of the species in an ecosystem. Extending the count duration from 5 to 8 min increased the detection probability to ≥ 0.3 for 5% ± 0.5% of the species. We found no difference in occupancy estimates that were based on 5- versus 8-min counts for species sampled over two or five consecutive years. However, for 97% of species sampled over 2 yr, precision of occupancy estimates that were based on 8-min counts averaged 12% ± 2% higher than those based on 5-min counts. We suggest that it may be worthwhile to conduct a pilot season to determine the number of locations and surveys needed to achieve detection probabilities that are sufficiently high to estimate occupancy for species of interest.

AB - Increasingly, point-count data are used to estimate occupancy, the probability that a species is present at a given location; occupancy accounts for imperfect detection, the probability that a species is detected given that it is present. To our knowledge, effects of sampling duration on inferences from models of bird occupancy have not been evaluated. Our objective was to determine whether changing count duration from 5 to 8 min affected inferences about the occupancy of birds sampled in the Chesapeake Bay Lowlands (eastern United States) and the central and western Great Basin (western United States) in 2012 and 2013. We examined the proportion of species (two doves, one cuckoo, two swifts, five hummingbirds, 11 woodpeckers, and 122 passerines) for which estimates of detection probability were ≥ 0.3. For species with single-season detection probabilities ≥ 0.3, we compared occupancy estimates derived from 5- and 8-min counts. We also compared estimates for three species sampled annually for 5 yr in the central Great Basin. Detection probabilities based on both the 5- and 8-min counts were ≥ 0.3 for 40% ± 3% of the species in an ecosystem. Extending the count duration from 5 to 8 min increased the detection probability to ≥ 0.3 for 5% ± 0.5% of the species. We found no difference in occupancy estimates that were based on 5- versus 8-min counts for species sampled over two or five consecutive years. However, for 97% of species sampled over 2 yr, precision of occupancy estimates that were based on 8-min counts averaged 12% ± 2% higher than those based on 5-min counts. We suggest that it may be worthwhile to conduct a pilot season to determine the number of locations and surveys needed to achieve detection probabilities that are sufficiently high to estimate occupancy for species of interest.

KW - avian survey design

KW - Chesapeake Bay Lowlands

KW - Great Basin

KW - point count

KW - single-season occupancy model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012993528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012993528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jofo.12183

DO - 10.1111/jofo.12183

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 80

EP - 93

JO - Journal of Field Ornithology

JF - Journal of Field Ornithology

SN - 0273-8570

IS - 1

ER -