Abstract
In three experiments, cued recall of sentences was found to vary with the type of orienting task performed during sentence presentation. Retrieval cues referred to information probably inferred from the sentences. Each of the semantic tasks led to greater recall than did the nonsernantic task; this task effect occurred in a between-subjects design and in a within-subjects design. Furthermore, the use of a task-indicating signal after each sentence, in the within-subjects design, allowed the manipulation of the timing and type of orienting task. The task effect on recall appeared even with a delay of the task-indicating signal and/or the addition of an initial semantic task (performed prior to the indicated task). The findings suggest both a processing explanation and an interruption explanation of task effects.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 59-66 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Memory & Cognition |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1977 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Psychology(all)
Cite this
Effects of orienting tasks on sentence comprehension and cued recall. / Till, Robert E; Cormak, David R.; Prince, Prescott L.
In: Memory & Cognition, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.1977, p. 59-66.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of orienting tasks on sentence comprehension and cued recall
AU - Till, Robert E
AU - Cormak, David R.
AU - Prince, Prescott L.
PY - 1977/1
Y1 - 1977/1
N2 - In three experiments, cued recall of sentences was found to vary with the type of orienting task performed during sentence presentation. Retrieval cues referred to information probably inferred from the sentences. Each of the semantic tasks led to greater recall than did the nonsernantic task; this task effect occurred in a between-subjects design and in a within-subjects design. Furthermore, the use of a task-indicating signal after each sentence, in the within-subjects design, allowed the manipulation of the timing and type of orienting task. The task effect on recall appeared even with a delay of the task-indicating signal and/or the addition of an initial semantic task (performed prior to the indicated task). The findings suggest both a processing explanation and an interruption explanation of task effects.
AB - In three experiments, cued recall of sentences was found to vary with the type of orienting task performed during sentence presentation. Retrieval cues referred to information probably inferred from the sentences. Each of the semantic tasks led to greater recall than did the nonsernantic task; this task effect occurred in a between-subjects design and in a within-subjects design. Furthermore, the use of a task-indicating signal after each sentence, in the within-subjects design, allowed the manipulation of the timing and type of orienting task. The task effect on recall appeared even with a delay of the task-indicating signal and/or the addition of an initial semantic task (performed prior to the indicated task). The findings suggest both a processing explanation and an interruption explanation of task effects.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0017389399&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0017389399&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/BF03209193
DO - 10.3758/BF03209193
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0017389399
VL - 5
SP - 59
EP - 66
JO - Memory and Cognition
JF - Memory and Cognition
SN - 0090-502X
IS - 1
ER -