Effects of orienting tasks on sentence comprehension and cued recall

Robert E Till, David R. Cormak, Prescott L. Prince

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In three experiments, cued recall of sentences was found to vary with the type of orienting task performed during sentence presentation. Retrieval cues referred to information probably inferred from the sentences. Each of the semantic tasks led to greater recall than did the nonsernantic task; this task effect occurred in a between-subjects design and in a within-subjects design. Furthermore, the use of a task-indicating signal after each sentence, in the within-subjects design, allowed the manipulation of the timing and type of orienting task. The task effect on recall appeared even with a delay of the task-indicating signal and/or the addition of an initial semantic task (performed prior to the indicated task). The findings suggest both a processing explanation and an interruption explanation of task effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-66
Number of pages8
JournalMemory & Cognition
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1977
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Semantics
Cues
Task Effects
Sentence Comprehension
Cued Recall

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Effects of orienting tasks on sentence comprehension and cued recall. / Till, Robert E; Cormak, David R.; Prince, Prescott L.

In: Memory & Cognition, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.1977, p. 59-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Till, Robert E ; Cormak, David R. ; Prince, Prescott L. / Effects of orienting tasks on sentence comprehension and cued recall. In: Memory & Cognition. 1977 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 59-66.
@article{b653a20c51454b23b42ae160bfd5d770,
title = "Effects of orienting tasks on sentence comprehension and cued recall",
abstract = "In three experiments, cued recall of sentences was found to vary with the type of orienting task performed during sentence presentation. Retrieval cues referred to information probably inferred from the sentences. Each of the semantic tasks led to greater recall than did the nonsernantic task; this task effect occurred in a between-subjects design and in a within-subjects design. Furthermore, the use of a task-indicating signal after each sentence, in the within-subjects design, allowed the manipulation of the timing and type of orienting task. The task effect on recall appeared even with a delay of the task-indicating signal and/or the addition of an initial semantic task (performed prior to the indicated task). The findings suggest both a processing explanation and an interruption explanation of task effects.",
author = "Till, {Robert E} and Cormak, {David R.} and Prince, {Prescott L.}",
year = "1977",
month = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03209193",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "59--66",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of orienting tasks on sentence comprehension and cued recall

AU - Till, Robert E

AU - Cormak, David R.

AU - Prince, Prescott L.

PY - 1977/1

Y1 - 1977/1

N2 - In three experiments, cued recall of sentences was found to vary with the type of orienting task performed during sentence presentation. Retrieval cues referred to information probably inferred from the sentences. Each of the semantic tasks led to greater recall than did the nonsernantic task; this task effect occurred in a between-subjects design and in a within-subjects design. Furthermore, the use of a task-indicating signal after each sentence, in the within-subjects design, allowed the manipulation of the timing and type of orienting task. The task effect on recall appeared even with a delay of the task-indicating signal and/or the addition of an initial semantic task (performed prior to the indicated task). The findings suggest both a processing explanation and an interruption explanation of task effects.

AB - In three experiments, cued recall of sentences was found to vary with the type of orienting task performed during sentence presentation. Retrieval cues referred to information probably inferred from the sentences. Each of the semantic tasks led to greater recall than did the nonsernantic task; this task effect occurred in a between-subjects design and in a within-subjects design. Furthermore, the use of a task-indicating signal after each sentence, in the within-subjects design, allowed the manipulation of the timing and type of orienting task. The task effect on recall appeared even with a delay of the task-indicating signal and/or the addition of an initial semantic task (performed prior to the indicated task). The findings suggest both a processing explanation and an interruption explanation of task effects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0017389399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0017389399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03209193

DO - 10.3758/BF03209193

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0017389399

VL - 5

SP - 59

EP - 66

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 1

ER -