Effects of mutual shading of tree crowns on prediction of photosynthetic light-use efficiency in a coastal Douglas-fir forest

Thomas Hilker, Nicholas C. Coops, Christopher R Schwalm, Rachhpal S. Jassal, T. Andrew Black, Praveena Krishnan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Gross primary production (GPP) is often expressed as the product of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation and the efficiency (ε) with which a plant community uses absorbed radiation in biomass production. Light-use efficiency is affected by environmental stresses, and varies diurnally and seasonally. Uncertainty about ε can be a serious limitation when modeling GPP. An important determinant of ε is the amount and type of solar radiation incident on a canopy, because an abundance of light can trigger a photo-protective reaction, diminishing GPP. The radiation regime in a forest canopy is determined by the predominant sky conditions and by mutual shading of tree crowns. Shading effects, producing shifts in the amount of incident direct and diffuse solar radiation, have been largely ignored, however, because they depend on forest structure and are difficult to measure. We describe a new approach for estimating changes in mutual canopy shading throughout the day and year based on a canopy structure model derived from light detection and ranging (LiDAR). Proportions of canopy shading were then combined with eddy covariance data to assess the explanatory power for variance in ε by regression tree analysis over half-hourly, daily and weekly time scales. The approach explained between 75 and 97% of variance in ε, representing an increase of between 5 and 16% compared with models driven solely by meteorological variables.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)825-834
Number of pages10
JournalTree Physiology
Volume28
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pseudotsuga
Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii
light use efficiency
shading
Crowns
tree crown
shade
canopy
Radiation
Light
primary production
primary productivity
prediction
forest canopy
solar radiation
lidar
eddy covariance
photosynthetically active radiation
environmental stress
plant community

Keywords

  • GPP
  • LiDAR
  • Regression trees

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Effects of mutual shading of tree crowns on prediction of photosynthetic light-use efficiency in a coastal Douglas-fir forest. / Hilker, Thomas; Coops, Nicholas C.; Schwalm, Christopher R; Jassal, Rachhpal S.; Black, T. Andrew; Krishnan, Praveena.

In: Tree Physiology, Vol. 28, No. 6, 06.2008, p. 825-834.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hilker, Thomas ; Coops, Nicholas C. ; Schwalm, Christopher R ; Jassal, Rachhpal S. ; Black, T. Andrew ; Krishnan, Praveena. / Effects of mutual shading of tree crowns on prediction of photosynthetic light-use efficiency in a coastal Douglas-fir forest. In: Tree Physiology. 2008 ; Vol. 28, No. 6. pp. 825-834.
@article{d7aa2388f4824447ad297663b1289df7,
title = "Effects of mutual shading of tree crowns on prediction of photosynthetic light-use efficiency in a coastal Douglas-fir forest",
abstract = "Gross primary production (GPP) is often expressed as the product of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation and the efficiency (ε) with which a plant community uses absorbed radiation in biomass production. Light-use efficiency is affected by environmental stresses, and varies diurnally and seasonally. Uncertainty about ε can be a serious limitation when modeling GPP. An important determinant of ε is the amount and type of solar radiation incident on a canopy, because an abundance of light can trigger a photo-protective reaction, diminishing GPP. The radiation regime in a forest canopy is determined by the predominant sky conditions and by mutual shading of tree crowns. Shading effects, producing shifts in the amount of incident direct and diffuse solar radiation, have been largely ignored, however, because they depend on forest structure and are difficult to measure. We describe a new approach for estimating changes in mutual canopy shading throughout the day and year based on a canopy structure model derived from light detection and ranging (LiDAR). Proportions of canopy shading were then combined with eddy covariance data to assess the explanatory power for variance in ε by regression tree analysis over half-hourly, daily and weekly time scales. The approach explained between 75 and 97{\%} of variance in ε, representing an increase of between 5 and 16{\%} compared with models driven solely by meteorological variables.",
keywords = "GPP, LiDAR, Regression trees",
author = "Thomas Hilker and Coops, {Nicholas C.} and Schwalm, {Christopher R} and Jassal, {Rachhpal S.} and Black, {T. Andrew} and Praveena Krishnan",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "825--834",
journal = "Tree Physiology",
issn = "0829-318X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of mutual shading of tree crowns on prediction of photosynthetic light-use efficiency in a coastal Douglas-fir forest

AU - Hilker, Thomas

AU - Coops, Nicholas C.

AU - Schwalm, Christopher R

AU - Jassal, Rachhpal S.

AU - Black, T. Andrew

AU - Krishnan, Praveena

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Gross primary production (GPP) is often expressed as the product of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation and the efficiency (ε) with which a plant community uses absorbed radiation in biomass production. Light-use efficiency is affected by environmental stresses, and varies diurnally and seasonally. Uncertainty about ε can be a serious limitation when modeling GPP. An important determinant of ε is the amount and type of solar radiation incident on a canopy, because an abundance of light can trigger a photo-protective reaction, diminishing GPP. The radiation regime in a forest canopy is determined by the predominant sky conditions and by mutual shading of tree crowns. Shading effects, producing shifts in the amount of incident direct and diffuse solar radiation, have been largely ignored, however, because they depend on forest structure and are difficult to measure. We describe a new approach for estimating changes in mutual canopy shading throughout the day and year based on a canopy structure model derived from light detection and ranging (LiDAR). Proportions of canopy shading were then combined with eddy covariance data to assess the explanatory power for variance in ε by regression tree analysis over half-hourly, daily and weekly time scales. The approach explained between 75 and 97% of variance in ε, representing an increase of between 5 and 16% compared with models driven solely by meteorological variables.

AB - Gross primary production (GPP) is often expressed as the product of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation and the efficiency (ε) with which a plant community uses absorbed radiation in biomass production. Light-use efficiency is affected by environmental stresses, and varies diurnally and seasonally. Uncertainty about ε can be a serious limitation when modeling GPP. An important determinant of ε is the amount and type of solar radiation incident on a canopy, because an abundance of light can trigger a photo-protective reaction, diminishing GPP. The radiation regime in a forest canopy is determined by the predominant sky conditions and by mutual shading of tree crowns. Shading effects, producing shifts in the amount of incident direct and diffuse solar radiation, have been largely ignored, however, because they depend on forest structure and are difficult to measure. We describe a new approach for estimating changes in mutual canopy shading throughout the day and year based on a canopy structure model derived from light detection and ranging (LiDAR). Proportions of canopy shading were then combined with eddy covariance data to assess the explanatory power for variance in ε by regression tree analysis over half-hourly, daily and weekly time scales. The approach explained between 75 and 97% of variance in ε, representing an increase of between 5 and 16% compared with models driven solely by meteorological variables.

KW - GPP

KW - LiDAR

KW - Regression trees

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44649108364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44649108364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 18381263

AN - SCOPUS:44649108364

VL - 28

SP - 825

EP - 834

JO - Tree Physiology

JF - Tree Physiology

SN - 0829-318X

IS - 6

ER -