Effect of using truncated versus total foot length to calculate the arch height ratio

Thomas G. McPoil, Mark W Cornwall, Bill Vicenzino, Deydre S. Teyhen, Joseph M. Molloy, Douglas S. Christie, Natalie Collins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the arch height ratio in a large cohort of subjects as well as to assess the reliability and validity of the foot measurements utilized in the study. Method: Eight hundred and fifty subjects, 393 women and 457 men, consented to participate in the study. The dorsal arch height, total foot length, and the truncated foot length were used to calculate two variations of the arch height ratio. In addition to determining within- and between-rater measurement reliability, radiographs were used to establish validity. Results: The truncated arch height ratio can be estimated using the total foot length, unless toe deformities are present in the individual being assessed. All foot measurements had high levels of intra- and inter-rater reliability and the validity of measuring the dorsal arch height while standing with equal weight on both feet was established. Conclusions: This investigation provides normative values from a large cohort of healthy female and male subjects for two variations of the arch height ratio. The arch height ratio is a reliable and valid measurement that may prove useful to clinicians and researchers for the classification of foot posture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)220-227
Number of pages8
JournalFoot
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008

Fingerprint

Foot
Reproducibility of Results
Toes
Posture
Research Personnel
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • Clinical measurement
  • Foot
  • Posture
  • Reliability
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Podiatry

Cite this

McPoil, T. G., Cornwall, M. W., Vicenzino, B., Teyhen, D. S., Molloy, J. M., Christie, D. S., & Collins, N. (2008). Effect of using truncated versus total foot length to calculate the arch height ratio. Foot, 18(4), 220-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2008.06.002

Effect of using truncated versus total foot length to calculate the arch height ratio. / McPoil, Thomas G.; Cornwall, Mark W; Vicenzino, Bill; Teyhen, Deydre S.; Molloy, Joseph M.; Christie, Douglas S.; Collins, Natalie.

In: Foot, Vol. 18, No. 4, 12.2008, p. 220-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McPoil, TG, Cornwall, MW, Vicenzino, B, Teyhen, DS, Molloy, JM, Christie, DS & Collins, N 2008, 'Effect of using truncated versus total foot length to calculate the arch height ratio', Foot, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 220-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2008.06.002
McPoil, Thomas G. ; Cornwall, Mark W ; Vicenzino, Bill ; Teyhen, Deydre S. ; Molloy, Joseph M. ; Christie, Douglas S. ; Collins, Natalie. / Effect of using truncated versus total foot length to calculate the arch height ratio. In: Foot. 2008 ; Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 220-227.
@article{f09ad123563d48bca22b1593e5f525a0,
title = "Effect of using truncated versus total foot length to calculate the arch height ratio",
abstract = "Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the arch height ratio in a large cohort of subjects as well as to assess the reliability and validity of the foot measurements utilized in the study. Method: Eight hundred and fifty subjects, 393 women and 457 men, consented to participate in the study. The dorsal arch height, total foot length, and the truncated foot length were used to calculate two variations of the arch height ratio. In addition to determining within- and between-rater measurement reliability, radiographs were used to establish validity. Results: The truncated arch height ratio can be estimated using the total foot length, unless toe deformities are present in the individual being assessed. All foot measurements had high levels of intra- and inter-rater reliability and the validity of measuring the dorsal arch height while standing with equal weight on both feet was established. Conclusions: This investigation provides normative values from a large cohort of healthy female and male subjects for two variations of the arch height ratio. The arch height ratio is a reliable and valid measurement that may prove useful to clinicians and researchers for the classification of foot posture.",
keywords = "Clinical measurement, Foot, Posture, Reliability, Validity",
author = "McPoil, {Thomas G.} and Cornwall, {Mark W} and Bill Vicenzino and Teyhen, {Deydre S.} and Molloy, {Joseph M.} and Christie, {Douglas S.} and Natalie Collins",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.foot.2008.06.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "220--227",
journal = "Foot",
issn = "0958-2592",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of using truncated versus total foot length to calculate the arch height ratio

AU - McPoil, Thomas G.

AU - Cornwall, Mark W

AU - Vicenzino, Bill

AU - Teyhen, Deydre S.

AU - Molloy, Joseph M.

AU - Christie, Douglas S.

AU - Collins, Natalie

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the arch height ratio in a large cohort of subjects as well as to assess the reliability and validity of the foot measurements utilized in the study. Method: Eight hundred and fifty subjects, 393 women and 457 men, consented to participate in the study. The dorsal arch height, total foot length, and the truncated foot length were used to calculate two variations of the arch height ratio. In addition to determining within- and between-rater measurement reliability, radiographs were used to establish validity. Results: The truncated arch height ratio can be estimated using the total foot length, unless toe deformities are present in the individual being assessed. All foot measurements had high levels of intra- and inter-rater reliability and the validity of measuring the dorsal arch height while standing with equal weight on both feet was established. Conclusions: This investigation provides normative values from a large cohort of healthy female and male subjects for two variations of the arch height ratio. The arch height ratio is a reliable and valid measurement that may prove useful to clinicians and researchers for the classification of foot posture.

AB - Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the arch height ratio in a large cohort of subjects as well as to assess the reliability and validity of the foot measurements utilized in the study. Method: Eight hundred and fifty subjects, 393 women and 457 men, consented to participate in the study. The dorsal arch height, total foot length, and the truncated foot length were used to calculate two variations of the arch height ratio. In addition to determining within- and between-rater measurement reliability, radiographs were used to establish validity. Results: The truncated arch height ratio can be estimated using the total foot length, unless toe deformities are present in the individual being assessed. All foot measurements had high levels of intra- and inter-rater reliability and the validity of measuring the dorsal arch height while standing with equal weight on both feet was established. Conclusions: This investigation provides normative values from a large cohort of healthy female and male subjects for two variations of the arch height ratio. The arch height ratio is a reliable and valid measurement that may prove useful to clinicians and researchers for the classification of foot posture.

KW - Clinical measurement

KW - Foot

KW - Posture

KW - Reliability

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56949108050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56949108050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foot.2008.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.foot.2008.06.002

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 220

EP - 227

JO - Foot

JF - Foot

SN - 0958-2592

IS - 4

ER -