Effect of training status on reliability of one repetition maximum testing in women

Melissa J. Benton, Scot Raab, Green T. Waggener

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In untrained adults, multiple trials of maximal strength testing are necessary to obtain reliable measures. Training status may positively influence test-retest reliability and increase testing efficiency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of training status on differences between trials of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) measurement in women. Before (untrained women [UTW]) and after (trained women [TRW]) an 8-week resistance training program, 10 women (45.6 ± 1.4 years; body mass index 28.7 ± 1.6 kg m22) completed 3 trials of 1RM chest and leg press with at least 24 hours rest between trials. In UTW, differences between chest press trials were nonsignificant (trials 1-2: 2.36 ± 1.39 kg, p = 0.37; trials 2-3: 0.82 ± 0.77 kg, p = 0.95; trials 1-3: 3.18 ± 0.16 kg, p = 0.07), although a significant difference between leg press trials 1-3 was observed (trials 1-2: 6.55 ± 3.31 kg, p = 0.25; trials 2-3: 2.52 ± 1.1 kg, p = 0.15; trials 1-3: 9.07 ± 2.83 kg, p = 0.04). In TRW, differences between all 1RM trials were nonsignificant for both the chest press (trials 1-2: 20.65 6 2.11 kg, p = 1.0; trials 2-3: 1.62 ± 0.69 kg, p = 0.15; trials 1-3: 0.96 ± 2.07 kg, p = 1.0) and leg press (trials 1-2: 21.51 6 2.13 kg, p = 1.0; trials 2-3: 3.53 ± 3.0 kg, p = 0.82; trials 1-3: 2.01 ± 3.87 kg, p = 1.0). Our results suggest that training status has a positive influence on the efficiency of maximal strength measurement. For trained middle-aged women, a single trial of 1RM chest or leg press may be sufficient to obtain an accurate and reliable measure of maximal strength.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1885-1890
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume27
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Leg
Thorax
Resistance Training
Reproducibility of Results
Body Mass Index
Education

Keywords

  • Chest press
  • Leg press
  • Maximal strength testing
  • Resistance training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Effect of training status on reliability of one repetition maximum testing in women. / Benton, Melissa J.; Raab, Scot; Waggener, Green T.

In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 27, No. 7, 07.2013, p. 1885-1890.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6cb1353d881541108f0244908dda06dc,
title = "Effect of training status on reliability of one repetition maximum testing in women",
abstract = "In untrained adults, multiple trials of maximal strength testing are necessary to obtain reliable measures. Training status may positively influence test-retest reliability and increase testing efficiency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of training status on differences between trials of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) measurement in women. Before (untrained women [UTW]) and after (trained women [TRW]) an 8-week resistance training program, 10 women (45.6 ± 1.4 years; body mass index 28.7 ± 1.6 kg m22) completed 3 trials of 1RM chest and leg press with at least 24 hours rest between trials. In UTW, differences between chest press trials were nonsignificant (trials 1-2: 2.36 ± 1.39 kg, p = 0.37; trials 2-3: 0.82 ± 0.77 kg, p = 0.95; trials 1-3: 3.18 ± 0.16 kg, p = 0.07), although a significant difference between leg press trials 1-3 was observed (trials 1-2: 6.55 ± 3.31 kg, p = 0.25; trials 2-3: 2.52 ± 1.1 kg, p = 0.15; trials 1-3: 9.07 ± 2.83 kg, p = 0.04). In TRW, differences between all 1RM trials were nonsignificant for both the chest press (trials 1-2: 20.65 6 2.11 kg, p = 1.0; trials 2-3: 1.62 ± 0.69 kg, p = 0.15; trials 1-3: 0.96 ± 2.07 kg, p = 1.0) and leg press (trials 1-2: 21.51 6 2.13 kg, p = 1.0; trials 2-3: 3.53 ± 3.0 kg, p = 0.82; trials 1-3: 2.01 ± 3.87 kg, p = 1.0). Our results suggest that training status has a positive influence on the efficiency of maximal strength measurement. For trained middle-aged women, a single trial of 1RM chest or leg press may be sufficient to obtain an accurate and reliable measure of maximal strength.",
keywords = "Chest press, Leg press, Maximal strength testing, Resistance training",
author = "Benton, {Melissa J.} and Scot Raab and Waggener, {Green T.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182752d4a",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "1885--1890",
journal = "Strength and Conditioning Journal",
issn = "1524-1602",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of training status on reliability of one repetition maximum testing in women

AU - Benton, Melissa J.

AU - Raab, Scot

AU - Waggener, Green T.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - In untrained adults, multiple trials of maximal strength testing are necessary to obtain reliable measures. Training status may positively influence test-retest reliability and increase testing efficiency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of training status on differences between trials of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) measurement in women. Before (untrained women [UTW]) and after (trained women [TRW]) an 8-week resistance training program, 10 women (45.6 ± 1.4 years; body mass index 28.7 ± 1.6 kg m22) completed 3 trials of 1RM chest and leg press with at least 24 hours rest between trials. In UTW, differences between chest press trials were nonsignificant (trials 1-2: 2.36 ± 1.39 kg, p = 0.37; trials 2-3: 0.82 ± 0.77 kg, p = 0.95; trials 1-3: 3.18 ± 0.16 kg, p = 0.07), although a significant difference between leg press trials 1-3 was observed (trials 1-2: 6.55 ± 3.31 kg, p = 0.25; trials 2-3: 2.52 ± 1.1 kg, p = 0.15; trials 1-3: 9.07 ± 2.83 kg, p = 0.04). In TRW, differences between all 1RM trials were nonsignificant for both the chest press (trials 1-2: 20.65 6 2.11 kg, p = 1.0; trials 2-3: 1.62 ± 0.69 kg, p = 0.15; trials 1-3: 0.96 ± 2.07 kg, p = 1.0) and leg press (trials 1-2: 21.51 6 2.13 kg, p = 1.0; trials 2-3: 3.53 ± 3.0 kg, p = 0.82; trials 1-3: 2.01 ± 3.87 kg, p = 1.0). Our results suggest that training status has a positive influence on the efficiency of maximal strength measurement. For trained middle-aged women, a single trial of 1RM chest or leg press may be sufficient to obtain an accurate and reliable measure of maximal strength.

AB - In untrained adults, multiple trials of maximal strength testing are necessary to obtain reliable measures. Training status may positively influence test-retest reliability and increase testing efficiency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of training status on differences between trials of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) measurement in women. Before (untrained women [UTW]) and after (trained women [TRW]) an 8-week resistance training program, 10 women (45.6 ± 1.4 years; body mass index 28.7 ± 1.6 kg m22) completed 3 trials of 1RM chest and leg press with at least 24 hours rest between trials. In UTW, differences between chest press trials were nonsignificant (trials 1-2: 2.36 ± 1.39 kg, p = 0.37; trials 2-3: 0.82 ± 0.77 kg, p = 0.95; trials 1-3: 3.18 ± 0.16 kg, p = 0.07), although a significant difference between leg press trials 1-3 was observed (trials 1-2: 6.55 ± 3.31 kg, p = 0.25; trials 2-3: 2.52 ± 1.1 kg, p = 0.15; trials 1-3: 9.07 ± 2.83 kg, p = 0.04). In TRW, differences between all 1RM trials were nonsignificant for both the chest press (trials 1-2: 20.65 6 2.11 kg, p = 1.0; trials 2-3: 1.62 ± 0.69 kg, p = 0.15; trials 1-3: 0.96 ± 2.07 kg, p = 1.0) and leg press (trials 1-2: 21.51 6 2.13 kg, p = 1.0; trials 2-3: 3.53 ± 3.0 kg, p = 0.82; trials 1-3: 2.01 ± 3.87 kg, p = 1.0). Our results suggest that training status has a positive influence on the efficiency of maximal strength measurement. For trained middle-aged women, a single trial of 1RM chest or leg press may be sufficient to obtain an accurate and reliable measure of maximal strength.

KW - Chest press

KW - Leg press

KW - Maximal strength testing

KW - Resistance training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884577199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884577199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182752d4a

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182752d4a

M3 - Article

C2 - 23037618

AN - SCOPUS:84884577199

VL - 27

SP - 1885

EP - 1890

JO - Strength and Conditioning Journal

JF - Strength and Conditioning Journal

SN - 1524-1602

IS - 7

ER -