Ecosystem service valuation through wildfire risk mitigation

Design, governance, and outcomes of the Flagstaff Watershed Protection Project (FWPP)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The full value of benefits rendered from healthy watersheds is difficult to estimate, and ecosystem service (ES) valuation sometimes necessarily occurs in the form of costs incurred or avoided. Along these lines, social-ecological systems including Payment forWatershed Services (PWS) are increasing in frequency and can help land management entities to bridge budget shortfalls for funding needed watershed restoration forestry treatments. The FlagstaffWatershed Protection Project (FWPP) is a bond-financed wildfire risk mitigation partnership and PWS program in Northern Arizona, the only forest management project that utilizes a municipal bond as the financial mechanism in conjunction with a partnership governance structure to invest in federal land management. The purpose of this research was to describe this new governance structure to understand the potential benefits to communities and federal land management agencies for protecting watershed services. Data were derived from document review and key informant interviews (n = 9). FWPP institutional design and governance structures were tailored to maximize community strengths and encompassed several advantages over traditional federal land management models; these advantages include increased collaboration and institutional support, financial security, and public approval. The FWPP represents an innovative PWS system that can help showcase unique community and federal forest management partnerships that benefit watershed health in western US communities

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number142
JournalForests
Volume8
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 26 2017

Fingerprint

risk reduction
governance
wildfires
valuation
wildfire
ecosystem service
ecosystem services
mitigation
watershed
land management
public lands
funding
forest management
project
interviews
forestry
services
cost

Keywords

  • Collaborative forest management
  • Community wildfire protection
  • Cost-avoidance
  • Fuels reduction
  • Fuels treatment
  • Partnership governance
  • Payments for ecosystem services
  • PWS institutional design
  • Watershed services protection
  • Wildfire mitigation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry

Cite this

@article{b66d88c05a624defbeba1f40016acd70,
title = "Ecosystem service valuation through wildfire risk mitigation: Design, governance, and outcomes of the Flagstaff Watershed Protection Project (FWPP)",
abstract = "The full value of benefits rendered from healthy watersheds is difficult to estimate, and ecosystem service (ES) valuation sometimes necessarily occurs in the form of costs incurred or avoided. Along these lines, social-ecological systems including Payment forWatershed Services (PWS) are increasing in frequency and can help land management entities to bridge budget shortfalls for funding needed watershed restoration forestry treatments. The FlagstaffWatershed Protection Project (FWPP) is a bond-financed wildfire risk mitigation partnership and PWS program in Northern Arizona, the only forest management project that utilizes a municipal bond as the financial mechanism in conjunction with a partnership governance structure to invest in federal land management. The purpose of this research was to describe this new governance structure to understand the potential benefits to communities and federal land management agencies for protecting watershed services. Data were derived from document review and key informant interviews (n = 9). FWPP institutional design and governance structures were tailored to maximize community strengths and encompassed several advantages over traditional federal land management models; these advantages include increased collaboration and institutional support, financial security, and public approval. The FWPP represents an innovative PWS system that can help showcase unique community and federal forest management partnerships that benefit watershed health in western US communities",
keywords = "Collaborative forest management, Community wildfire protection, Cost-avoidance, Fuels reduction, Fuels treatment, Partnership governance, Payments for ecosystem services, PWS institutional design, Watershed services protection, Wildfire mitigation",
author = "Roy Miller and Erik Nielsen and Ching-Hsun Huang",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "26",
doi = "10.3390/f8050142",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Forests",
issn = "1999-4907",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ecosystem service valuation through wildfire risk mitigation

T2 - Design, governance, and outcomes of the Flagstaff Watershed Protection Project (FWPP)

AU - Miller, Roy

AU - Nielsen, Erik

AU - Huang, Ching-Hsun

PY - 2017/4/26

Y1 - 2017/4/26

N2 - The full value of benefits rendered from healthy watersheds is difficult to estimate, and ecosystem service (ES) valuation sometimes necessarily occurs in the form of costs incurred or avoided. Along these lines, social-ecological systems including Payment forWatershed Services (PWS) are increasing in frequency and can help land management entities to bridge budget shortfalls for funding needed watershed restoration forestry treatments. The FlagstaffWatershed Protection Project (FWPP) is a bond-financed wildfire risk mitigation partnership and PWS program in Northern Arizona, the only forest management project that utilizes a municipal bond as the financial mechanism in conjunction with a partnership governance structure to invest in federal land management. The purpose of this research was to describe this new governance structure to understand the potential benefits to communities and federal land management agencies for protecting watershed services. Data were derived from document review and key informant interviews (n = 9). FWPP institutional design and governance structures were tailored to maximize community strengths and encompassed several advantages over traditional federal land management models; these advantages include increased collaboration and institutional support, financial security, and public approval. The FWPP represents an innovative PWS system that can help showcase unique community and federal forest management partnerships that benefit watershed health in western US communities

AB - The full value of benefits rendered from healthy watersheds is difficult to estimate, and ecosystem service (ES) valuation sometimes necessarily occurs in the form of costs incurred or avoided. Along these lines, social-ecological systems including Payment forWatershed Services (PWS) are increasing in frequency and can help land management entities to bridge budget shortfalls for funding needed watershed restoration forestry treatments. The FlagstaffWatershed Protection Project (FWPP) is a bond-financed wildfire risk mitigation partnership and PWS program in Northern Arizona, the only forest management project that utilizes a municipal bond as the financial mechanism in conjunction with a partnership governance structure to invest in federal land management. The purpose of this research was to describe this new governance structure to understand the potential benefits to communities and federal land management agencies for protecting watershed services. Data were derived from document review and key informant interviews (n = 9). FWPP institutional design and governance structures were tailored to maximize community strengths and encompassed several advantages over traditional federal land management models; these advantages include increased collaboration and institutional support, financial security, and public approval. The FWPP represents an innovative PWS system that can help showcase unique community and federal forest management partnerships that benefit watershed health in western US communities

KW - Collaborative forest management

KW - Community wildfire protection

KW - Cost-avoidance

KW - Fuels reduction

KW - Fuels treatment

KW - Partnership governance

KW - Payments for ecosystem services

KW - PWS institutional design

KW - Watershed services protection

KW - Wildfire mitigation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018457689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018457689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/f8050142

DO - 10.3390/f8050142

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - Forests

JF - Forests

SN - 1999-4907

IS - 5

M1 - 142

ER -