TY - JOUR
T1 - Ecosystem hero and villain
T2 - Native frog consumes rice pests, while the invasive cane toad feasts on beneficial arthropods
AU - Shuman-Goodier, Molly E.
AU - Diaz, Mildred I.
AU - Almazan, Maria Liberty
AU - Singleton, Grant R.
AU - Hadi, Buyung A.R.
AU - Propper, Catherine R.
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to Lindsey Benally, Renee Lorica, and Riley Smith for their assistance in the field and laboratory. We also thank Rachel Rubin for her editorial support, and the anonymous reviewers who helped to improve the manuscript. Funding was provided by the Merriam Powell Center for Environmental Research’s Integrative Graduate Education, Research, and Traineeship Program (IGERT) Fellowship , the Achievement Rewards for College Scientists (ARCS) Foundation , the Closing Rice Yield Gaps in Asia with a Reduced Environmental Footprint (CORIGAP) funded by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation , the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities of the NIH , Award Number T37MD008626 to CRP.
PY - 2019/7/1
Y1 - 2019/7/1
N2 - Lowland irrigated rice fields serve the dual purpose of providing an essential food crop to the world's most populous regions and functioning as man-made wetlands that harbor a diversity of organisms. Amphibians occupy rice fields throughout Asia and South America, but little is known about their functional role in the rice ecosystem. We conducted field surveys in Los Baños, Philippines over two separate rainy seasons (2015 and 2017) to determine whether native Luzon wart frogs and invasive cane toads consume rice pests, and if so, which species was more effective in doing so. We also examined diet composition to test whether the two species compete for food resources in rice fields. We found that despite smaller body sizes, the Luzon wart frog consumed the same total mass of prey as the cane toad (although it consumed fewer total prey items), and that pests made up the largest proportion (54.1%) of its total diet. In contrast, the majority (89.4%) of the cane toad's diet consisted of beneficial arthropod predators. Taxonomic analyses of diet composition and breadth revealed that the diet of Luzon wart frog was distinct from that of the cane toad, although there was overlap, and that both species consumed diverse array of prey. Taken together, these data suggest adult Luzon wart frogs may provide effective pest control services, and that they may not be in direct competition over food resources with adult cane toads in rice fields. We also present the first evidence suggesting that cane toads may indirectly damage rice crops by consuming beneficial predators integral to the function of lowland rice ecosystems. We suggest that rice agro-ecosystems should be managed to promote species such as the native Luzon wart frog, and to reduce populations of the introduced cane toad in order to safeguard native biodiversity while simultaneously improving yields and reducing insecticide input.
AB - Lowland irrigated rice fields serve the dual purpose of providing an essential food crop to the world's most populous regions and functioning as man-made wetlands that harbor a diversity of organisms. Amphibians occupy rice fields throughout Asia and South America, but little is known about their functional role in the rice ecosystem. We conducted field surveys in Los Baños, Philippines over two separate rainy seasons (2015 and 2017) to determine whether native Luzon wart frogs and invasive cane toads consume rice pests, and if so, which species was more effective in doing so. We also examined diet composition to test whether the two species compete for food resources in rice fields. We found that despite smaller body sizes, the Luzon wart frog consumed the same total mass of prey as the cane toad (although it consumed fewer total prey items), and that pests made up the largest proportion (54.1%) of its total diet. In contrast, the majority (89.4%) of the cane toad's diet consisted of beneficial arthropod predators. Taxonomic analyses of diet composition and breadth revealed that the diet of Luzon wart frog was distinct from that of the cane toad, although there was overlap, and that both species consumed diverse array of prey. Taken together, these data suggest adult Luzon wart frogs may provide effective pest control services, and that they may not be in direct competition over food resources with adult cane toads in rice fields. We also present the first evidence suggesting that cane toads may indirectly damage rice crops by consuming beneficial predators integral to the function of lowland rice ecosystems. We suggest that rice agro-ecosystems should be managed to promote species such as the native Luzon wart frog, and to reduce populations of the introduced cane toad in order to safeguard native biodiversity while simultaneously improving yields and reducing insecticide input.
KW - Amphibians
KW - Asia
KW - Competition
KW - Diet
KW - Pests
KW - Rice fields
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064319470&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064319470&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2019.04.008
DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2019.04.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85064319470
VL - 279
SP - 100
EP - 108
JO - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
JF - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
SN - 0167-8809
ER -