Ecosystem context illuminates conflicting roles of plant diversity in carbon storage

E. Carol Adair, David U. Hooper, Alain Paquette, Bruce A Hungate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Plant diversity can increase biomass production in plot-scale studies, but applying these results to ecosystem carbon (C) storage at larger spatial and temporal scales remains problematic. Other ecosystem controls interact with diversity and plant production, and may influence soil pools differently from plant pools. We integrated diversity with the state-factor framework, which identifies key controls, or ‘state factors’, over ecosystem properties and services such as C storage. We used this framework to assess the effects of diversity, plant traits and state factors (climate, topography, time) on live tree, standing dead, organic horizon and total C in Québec forests. Four patterns emerged: (1) while state factors were usually the most important model predictors, models with both state and biotic factors (mean plant traits and diversity) better predicted C pools; (2) mean plant traits were better predictors than diversity; (3) diversity increased live tree C but reduced organic horizon C; (4) different C pools responded to different traits and diversity metrics. These results suggest that, where ecosystem properties result from multiple processes, no simple relationship may exist with any one organismal factor. Integrating biodiversity into ecosystem ecology and assessing both traits and diversity improves our mechanistic understanding of biotic effects on ecosystems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1604-1619
Number of pages16
JournalEcology Letters
Volume21
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

carbon sequestration
ecosystems
ecosystem
organic horizons
biotic factor
topography
biomass production
biodiversity
ecology
climate
carbon
biomass
soil

Keywords

  • biodiversity
  • community-weighted mean
  • ecosystem functioning
  • ecosystem services
  • functional diversity
  • functional traits
  • interactive factors
  • phylogenetic diversity
  • species richness
  • state factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Ecosystem context illuminates conflicting roles of plant diversity in carbon storage. / Carol Adair, E.; Hooper, David U.; Paquette, Alain; Hungate, Bruce A.

In: Ecology Letters, Vol. 21, No. 11, 01.11.2018, p. 1604-1619.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carol Adair, E. ; Hooper, David U. ; Paquette, Alain ; Hungate, Bruce A. / Ecosystem context illuminates conflicting roles of plant diversity in carbon storage. In: Ecology Letters. 2018 ; Vol. 21, No. 11. pp. 1604-1619.
@article{674819809b074776a8dbee61409e3202,
title = "Ecosystem context illuminates conflicting roles of plant diversity in carbon storage",
abstract = "Plant diversity can increase biomass production in plot-scale studies, but applying these results to ecosystem carbon (C) storage at larger spatial and temporal scales remains problematic. Other ecosystem controls interact with diversity and plant production, and may influence soil pools differently from plant pools. We integrated diversity with the state-factor framework, which identifies key controls, or ‘state factors’, over ecosystem properties and services such as C storage. We used this framework to assess the effects of diversity, plant traits and state factors (climate, topography, time) on live tree, standing dead, organic horizon and total C in Qu{\'e}bec forests. Four patterns emerged: (1) while state factors were usually the most important model predictors, models with both state and biotic factors (mean plant traits and diversity) better predicted C pools; (2) mean plant traits were better predictors than diversity; (3) diversity increased live tree C but reduced organic horizon C; (4) different C pools responded to different traits and diversity metrics. These results suggest that, where ecosystem properties result from multiple processes, no simple relationship may exist with any one organismal factor. Integrating biodiversity into ecosystem ecology and assessing both traits and diversity improves our mechanistic understanding of biotic effects on ecosystems.",
keywords = "biodiversity, community-weighted mean, ecosystem functioning, ecosystem services, functional diversity, functional traits, interactive factors, phylogenetic diversity, species richness, state factors",
author = "{Carol Adair}, E. and Hooper, {David U.} and Alain Paquette and Hungate, {Bruce A}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ele.13145",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "1604--1619",
journal = "Ecology Letters",
issn = "1461-023X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ecosystem context illuminates conflicting roles of plant diversity in carbon storage

AU - Carol Adair, E.

AU - Hooper, David U.

AU - Paquette, Alain

AU - Hungate, Bruce A

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Plant diversity can increase biomass production in plot-scale studies, but applying these results to ecosystem carbon (C) storage at larger spatial and temporal scales remains problematic. Other ecosystem controls interact with diversity and plant production, and may influence soil pools differently from plant pools. We integrated diversity with the state-factor framework, which identifies key controls, or ‘state factors’, over ecosystem properties and services such as C storage. We used this framework to assess the effects of diversity, plant traits and state factors (climate, topography, time) on live tree, standing dead, organic horizon and total C in Québec forests. Four patterns emerged: (1) while state factors were usually the most important model predictors, models with both state and biotic factors (mean plant traits and diversity) better predicted C pools; (2) mean plant traits were better predictors than diversity; (3) diversity increased live tree C but reduced organic horizon C; (4) different C pools responded to different traits and diversity metrics. These results suggest that, where ecosystem properties result from multiple processes, no simple relationship may exist with any one organismal factor. Integrating biodiversity into ecosystem ecology and assessing both traits and diversity improves our mechanistic understanding of biotic effects on ecosystems.

AB - Plant diversity can increase biomass production in plot-scale studies, but applying these results to ecosystem carbon (C) storage at larger spatial and temporal scales remains problematic. Other ecosystem controls interact with diversity and plant production, and may influence soil pools differently from plant pools. We integrated diversity with the state-factor framework, which identifies key controls, or ‘state factors’, over ecosystem properties and services such as C storage. We used this framework to assess the effects of diversity, plant traits and state factors (climate, topography, time) on live tree, standing dead, organic horizon and total C in Québec forests. Four patterns emerged: (1) while state factors were usually the most important model predictors, models with both state and biotic factors (mean plant traits and diversity) better predicted C pools; (2) mean plant traits were better predictors than diversity; (3) diversity increased live tree C but reduced organic horizon C; (4) different C pools responded to different traits and diversity metrics. These results suggest that, where ecosystem properties result from multiple processes, no simple relationship may exist with any one organismal factor. Integrating biodiversity into ecosystem ecology and assessing both traits and diversity improves our mechanistic understanding of biotic effects on ecosystems.

KW - biodiversity

KW - community-weighted mean

KW - ecosystem functioning

KW - ecosystem services

KW - functional diversity

KW - functional traits

KW - interactive factors

KW - phylogenetic diversity

KW - species richness

KW - state factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053194879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053194879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ele.13145

DO - 10.1111/ele.13145

M3 - Article

C2 - 30152093

AN - SCOPUS:85053194879

VL - 21

SP - 1604

EP - 1619

JO - Ecology Letters

JF - Ecology Letters

SN - 1461-023X

IS - 11

ER -