Economics of northern bobwhite and timber management in the southeastern United States

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Populations of northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) have declined significantly over the past 50 years, and the primary factor contributing to this decline has been the loss of habitat. Forest landowners who are concerned with providing bobwhite habitat as well as generating revenue from timber should balance the silvicultural requirements of timber production with the biological needs of the bobwhite. The goal of this study was to determine the economic tradeoffs between bobwhite and timber management and how to minimize loss or maximize profit when managing for bobwhite and timber simultaneously. I performed discounted cash flow analyses, calculated land expectation value, and determined the financially optimal rotation age and optimal timing and intensity of thinnings for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations under specific management objectives. My results show that the annual per-hectare economic gains of managing for both bobwhite and timber ranged from US$19.27 to $41.37 on site index 50 land, and ranged from $32.63 to $50.02 on site index 90 land. My analysis indicates that bobwhite management provides an investment opportunity to landowners whose low-productivity sites would be unprofitable if timber is the only product. My study provides an example of integrating multiple uses of goods and services in a way that maximizes economic returns and aids land managers in producing better habitat for bobwhite.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1355-1361
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Wildlife Management
Volume73
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2009

Fingerprint

timber management
Southeastern United States
timber
landowners
Pinus taeda
economics
site index
Colinus virginianus
land values
landowner
timber production
habitats
habitat destruction
habitat
thinning (plants)
profits and margins
managers
income
plantations
forestry production

Keywords

  • Colinus virginianus
  • economic trade-offs
  • northern bobwhite
  • optimal bobwhite management
  • timber

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Economics of northern bobwhite and timber management in the southeastern United States. / Huang, Ching-Hsun.

In: Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 73, No. 8, 11.2009, p. 1355-1361.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e7ec52e1ddc54cff8e6c90a1914e0905,
title = "Economics of northern bobwhite and timber management in the southeastern United States",
abstract = "Populations of northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) have declined significantly over the past 50 years, and the primary factor contributing to this decline has been the loss of habitat. Forest landowners who are concerned with providing bobwhite habitat as well as generating revenue from timber should balance the silvicultural requirements of timber production with the biological needs of the bobwhite. The goal of this study was to determine the economic tradeoffs between bobwhite and timber management and how to minimize loss or maximize profit when managing for bobwhite and timber simultaneously. I performed discounted cash flow analyses, calculated land expectation value, and determined the financially optimal rotation age and optimal timing and intensity of thinnings for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations under specific management objectives. My results show that the annual per-hectare economic gains of managing for both bobwhite and timber ranged from US$19.27 to $41.37 on site index 50 land, and ranged from $32.63 to $50.02 on site index 90 land. My analysis indicates that bobwhite management provides an investment opportunity to landowners whose low-productivity sites would be unprofitable if timber is the only product. My study provides an example of integrating multiple uses of goods and services in a way that maximizes economic returns and aids land managers in producing better habitat for bobwhite.",
keywords = "Colinus virginianus, economic trade-offs, northern bobwhite, optimal bobwhite management, timber",
author = "Ching-Hsun Huang",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
doi = "10.2193/2008-229",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "1355--1361",
journal = "Journal of Wildlife Management",
issn = "0022-541X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economics of northern bobwhite and timber management in the southeastern United States

AU - Huang, Ching-Hsun

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - Populations of northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) have declined significantly over the past 50 years, and the primary factor contributing to this decline has been the loss of habitat. Forest landowners who are concerned with providing bobwhite habitat as well as generating revenue from timber should balance the silvicultural requirements of timber production with the biological needs of the bobwhite. The goal of this study was to determine the economic tradeoffs between bobwhite and timber management and how to minimize loss or maximize profit when managing for bobwhite and timber simultaneously. I performed discounted cash flow analyses, calculated land expectation value, and determined the financially optimal rotation age and optimal timing and intensity of thinnings for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations under specific management objectives. My results show that the annual per-hectare economic gains of managing for both bobwhite and timber ranged from US$19.27 to $41.37 on site index 50 land, and ranged from $32.63 to $50.02 on site index 90 land. My analysis indicates that bobwhite management provides an investment opportunity to landowners whose low-productivity sites would be unprofitable if timber is the only product. My study provides an example of integrating multiple uses of goods and services in a way that maximizes economic returns and aids land managers in producing better habitat for bobwhite.

AB - Populations of northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) have declined significantly over the past 50 years, and the primary factor contributing to this decline has been the loss of habitat. Forest landowners who are concerned with providing bobwhite habitat as well as generating revenue from timber should balance the silvicultural requirements of timber production with the biological needs of the bobwhite. The goal of this study was to determine the economic tradeoffs between bobwhite and timber management and how to minimize loss or maximize profit when managing for bobwhite and timber simultaneously. I performed discounted cash flow analyses, calculated land expectation value, and determined the financially optimal rotation age and optimal timing and intensity of thinnings for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations under specific management objectives. My results show that the annual per-hectare economic gains of managing for both bobwhite and timber ranged from US$19.27 to $41.37 on site index 50 land, and ranged from $32.63 to $50.02 on site index 90 land. My analysis indicates that bobwhite management provides an investment opportunity to landowners whose low-productivity sites would be unprofitable if timber is the only product. My study provides an example of integrating multiple uses of goods and services in a way that maximizes economic returns and aids land managers in producing better habitat for bobwhite.

KW - Colinus virginianus

KW - economic trade-offs

KW - northern bobwhite

KW - optimal bobwhite management

KW - timber

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954471152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954471152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2193/2008-229

DO - 10.2193/2008-229

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77954471152

VL - 73

SP - 1355

EP - 1361

JO - Journal of Wildlife Management

JF - Journal of Wildlife Management

SN - 0022-541X

IS - 8

ER -