Economic analysis of sequestering carbon in green ash forests in the Lower Mississippi River Valley.

Ching-Hsun Huang, Gary D. Kronrad, Shiaolin D. Cheng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Since the U.S. is the largest emitter of carbon dioxide (CO2), it has become crucial to develop options that are both cost effective and supportive of sustainable development to reduce atmospheric CO2. Electric utility companies have the options of reducing their use of fossil fuels, switching to alternative energy sources, increasing efficiency, or offsetting carbon emissions. This study determined the cost and profitability of sequestering carbon in green ash plantations, and the number of tons of carbon that can be sequestered. The profitability of green ash is 2,342 dollars and 3,645 dollars per acre on site indices (measurement of soil quality) 65 and 105 land, respectively, calculated with a 2.5% alternative rate of return (ARR). These figures shift to -248 dollars and -240 dollars calculated with a 15.0% ARR. If landowners who have an ARR of 2.5% can sell carbon credits for 10 dollars per ton of carbon, profits will increase by 107 dollars per acre on poor sites and 242 dollars on good sites. Over one rotation (cutting cycle), 38.56 net tons of carbon can be sequestered on an acre of poor quality land and 51.35 tons on good quality land. The cost of sequestering carbon, without including revenues from timber production and carbon credits, ranges from a high of 15.20 dollars per ton on poor sites to 14.41 dollars on good sites, calculated with a 2.5% ARR; to a high of 8.51 dollars per ton on poor sites to 7.63 dollars on good sites, calculated with a 15.0% ARR. The cost of storing carbon can be reduced significantly if the trees can be sold for wood products.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)731-740
Number of pages10
JournalTheScientificWorldJournal [electronic resource]
Volume3
StatePublished - Aug 19 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ashes
Mississippi
Economic analysis
economic analysis
Rivers
ash
Carbon
Economics
valley
carbon
river
Costs and Cost Analysis
Profitability
profitability
cost
Costs
Fossil Fuels
site index
alternative energy
forestry production

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Economic analysis of sequestering carbon in green ash forests in the Lower Mississippi River Valley. / Huang, Ching-Hsun; Kronrad, Gary D.; Cheng, Shiaolin D.

In: TheScientificWorldJournal [electronic resource], Vol. 3, 19.08.2003, p. 731-740.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2e7ecc1b51f6411785f4567bd1cb7d8f,
title = "Economic analysis of sequestering carbon in green ash forests in the Lower Mississippi River Valley.",
abstract = "Since the U.S. is the largest emitter of carbon dioxide (CO2), it has become crucial to develop options that are both cost effective and supportive of sustainable development to reduce atmospheric CO2. Electric utility companies have the options of reducing their use of fossil fuels, switching to alternative energy sources, increasing efficiency, or offsetting carbon emissions. This study determined the cost and profitability of sequestering carbon in green ash plantations, and the number of tons of carbon that can be sequestered. The profitability of green ash is 2,342 dollars and 3,645 dollars per acre on site indices (measurement of soil quality) 65 and 105 land, respectively, calculated with a 2.5{\%} alternative rate of return (ARR). These figures shift to -248 dollars and -240 dollars calculated with a 15.0{\%} ARR. If landowners who have an ARR of 2.5{\%} can sell carbon credits for 10 dollars per ton of carbon, profits will increase by 107 dollars per acre on poor sites and 242 dollars on good sites. Over one rotation (cutting cycle), 38.56 net tons of carbon can be sequestered on an acre of poor quality land and 51.35 tons on good quality land. The cost of sequestering carbon, without including revenues from timber production and carbon credits, ranges from a high of 15.20 dollars per ton on poor sites to 14.41 dollars on good sites, calculated with a 2.5{\%} ARR; to a high of 8.51 dollars per ton on poor sites to 7.63 dollars on good sites, calculated with a 15.0{\%} ARR. The cost of storing carbon can be reduced significantly if the trees can be sold for wood products.",
author = "Ching-Hsun Huang and Kronrad, {Gary D.} and Cheng, {Shiaolin D.}",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
day = "19",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "731--740",
journal = "The Scientific World Journal",
issn = "2356-6140",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic analysis of sequestering carbon in green ash forests in the Lower Mississippi River Valley.

AU - Huang, Ching-Hsun

AU - Kronrad, Gary D.

AU - Cheng, Shiaolin D.

PY - 2003/8/19

Y1 - 2003/8/19

N2 - Since the U.S. is the largest emitter of carbon dioxide (CO2), it has become crucial to develop options that are both cost effective and supportive of sustainable development to reduce atmospheric CO2. Electric utility companies have the options of reducing their use of fossil fuels, switching to alternative energy sources, increasing efficiency, or offsetting carbon emissions. This study determined the cost and profitability of sequestering carbon in green ash plantations, and the number of tons of carbon that can be sequestered. The profitability of green ash is 2,342 dollars and 3,645 dollars per acre on site indices (measurement of soil quality) 65 and 105 land, respectively, calculated with a 2.5% alternative rate of return (ARR). These figures shift to -248 dollars and -240 dollars calculated with a 15.0% ARR. If landowners who have an ARR of 2.5% can sell carbon credits for 10 dollars per ton of carbon, profits will increase by 107 dollars per acre on poor sites and 242 dollars on good sites. Over one rotation (cutting cycle), 38.56 net tons of carbon can be sequestered on an acre of poor quality land and 51.35 tons on good quality land. The cost of sequestering carbon, without including revenues from timber production and carbon credits, ranges from a high of 15.20 dollars per ton on poor sites to 14.41 dollars on good sites, calculated with a 2.5% ARR; to a high of 8.51 dollars per ton on poor sites to 7.63 dollars on good sites, calculated with a 15.0% ARR. The cost of storing carbon can be reduced significantly if the trees can be sold for wood products.

AB - Since the U.S. is the largest emitter of carbon dioxide (CO2), it has become crucial to develop options that are both cost effective and supportive of sustainable development to reduce atmospheric CO2. Electric utility companies have the options of reducing their use of fossil fuels, switching to alternative energy sources, increasing efficiency, or offsetting carbon emissions. This study determined the cost and profitability of sequestering carbon in green ash plantations, and the number of tons of carbon that can be sequestered. The profitability of green ash is 2,342 dollars and 3,645 dollars per acre on site indices (measurement of soil quality) 65 and 105 land, respectively, calculated with a 2.5% alternative rate of return (ARR). These figures shift to -248 dollars and -240 dollars calculated with a 15.0% ARR. If landowners who have an ARR of 2.5% can sell carbon credits for 10 dollars per ton of carbon, profits will increase by 107 dollars per acre on poor sites and 242 dollars on good sites. Over one rotation (cutting cycle), 38.56 net tons of carbon can be sequestered on an acre of poor quality land and 51.35 tons on good quality land. The cost of sequestering carbon, without including revenues from timber production and carbon credits, ranges from a high of 15.20 dollars per ton on poor sites to 14.41 dollars on good sites, calculated with a 2.5% ARR; to a high of 8.51 dollars per ton on poor sites to 7.63 dollars on good sites, calculated with a 15.0% ARR. The cost of storing carbon can be reduced significantly if the trees can be sold for wood products.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542755230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1542755230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12941973

AN - SCOPUS:1542755230

VL - 3

SP - 731

EP - 740

JO - The Scientific World Journal

JF - The Scientific World Journal

SN - 2356-6140

ER -